Jump to content

Coulda, Shoulda, Woulda - A Thread Dedicated to Players Orioles Could (maybe) Have Acquired


baltfan

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I hate the idea of this thread.  The team we have is the one we’re going to have.  I don’t live in some alternative universe.  There’s no way to know what any player who isn’t on the Orioles would have done if he’d been on the Orioles.  

You can always just ignore it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I hate the idea of this thread.  The team we have is the one we’re going to have.  I don’t live in some alternative universe.  There’s no way to know what any player who isn’t on the Orioles would have done if he’d been on the Orioles.  

Fair points, though in advocating for who people wanted or didn't want the Orioles to trade for you are relying upon their success with a team that is not the Orioles as well.  I suspect the thread will reveal that none of this is as simple as fans make it out to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

You can always just ignore it.

Yes, and I will.  The team might have done more, but it’s over now and I don’t need to re-live the 2923 trade deadline from now until the end of time.  I’ll root for the team we have, agonize when our bullpen screws up and wish we had someone more reliable, but I’m not going to “what if” specific players.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I hate the idea of this thread.  The team we have is the one we’re going to have.  I don’t live in some alternative universe.  There’s no way to know what any player who isn’t on the Orioles would have done if he’d been on the Orioles.  

There’s only so much that everyone can talk about the 9th place hitting SS that plays 3 times a week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it would have taken Kjerstad to beat Gilbert and Clifford, but Christopher Russo talking with Bob Costas just reported he'd spoken with Ben Verlander the other day, and Ben's account was Justin would have been okay with BAL.

Of course now in the after action spin it could be trying to sand down edges for Gunnar and the young guys battling old guys for prizes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • To put things into context, Jackson has so far an .898 OPS at AAA in his age 20 season (he started the season at over 1.000 before his call-up, I don't think it's a stretch to suggest that going up and struggling might've had some effect on his numbers afterwards).  Mayo at age 20 had a .782 OPS between A+ and AA. Basallo will turn 20 in 60 days. He's about 2/3 of a year younger than Holliday. In his age 19 season he currently has an .810 OPS. In Jackson's age 19 season he had a .928 OPS at Bowie before moving on to AAA where he OPS'd .796 in 91 PA.  Unless there is important statistic evidence suggesting that ISO at the major league level is a more important indicator of future success than say wRC+ or OPS (and if this were true, we should be encouraged by the fact that Jackson has gone from a .176 ISO--.133 at the same level--to .196 ISO from age 19 to 20) I don't really see any argument for putting Basallo or Mayo above them. With all due respect--because I think you are putting forth some interesting points and almost convinced me before I did this little exercise--I think you are likely subconsciously being affected too strongly by Jackson's 36 PA at the ML level. 
    • Good luck. Tomorrow is still TBD it appears.
    • It seems to make little sense to go to a 6 man rotation given how thin the bullpen already is. I certainly hope that is not the plan. Yes we can “get by” against the struggling Braves using Tate and Akin in high leverage situations. But that odds of using such mid relievers against good opponents (who can hit) is not very likely.
    • Yeah and at this point we dont have to use him in every save situation.  The other guys have been very good and just looking at the numbers it is gonna be almost impossible not to make the playoffs.  The division would be great but if the Yanks win 105+ games you just tip your cap to them as they are playing unreal baseball so far and continue to stay healthy.   There are only 6 team in the AL over .500 with Boston at .500.  Assuming 90 wins makes the playoffs(which i think will be less then that actually this year way the top teams are playing all we have to do is go 45-50  the rest of the way to make the playoffs.  The Red Sox and any other team would have to play  above .600 baseball to get to 90 wins.  If we don't get to 90 wins a whole lot more then having to use a different guy in a save situation here and there to give him rest.  
    • Hate to say it but that is how I have felt for a while now.  I just don't see the athleticism or the special qualities in him that you do with a Gunnar or a Judge.  Things that make them standout from the rest.   He looks just like a regular player.  I see a young looking, not very athletic, good baseball player for his age. The best prospect in baseball?   I have doubts on that.    And that is not to say he won't be a really good player in the future.  I just don't see superstar.
    • God, I hate flawed baseball players.  They're the absolute worst.
    • People can’t see the forest through the trees.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...