Jump to content

Jack Flaherty 2023


AdamK

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Once he got rolling yesterday he was an ACE. He’s got a lot to pitch for and prove as an upcoming FA. He gives our SP some swagger that they didn’t have before. 

I think we know who is starting Game One. 

I admire the optimism but to anoint him as a Game One starter after 6 innings is a bit silly. 
 

That said, he pitched better than expected yesterday. Very encouraging. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I admire the optimism but to anoint him as a Game One starter after 6 innings is a bit silly. 
 

That said, he pitched better than expected yesterday. Very encouraging. 

Agreed. If he threw bad yesterday I wouldn’t have been upset either. Very encouraged by the start because it’s basically 10 percent of the rental has been great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My thoughts:

-his slider and knuckle curve were both quality pitches that got a lot of swing and miss. Don’t feel we have starters that have multiple offspeed swing and miss pitches.

-looks like he is similar to pretty much every other pitcher in history; fastball command to get ahead will dictate his success

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assumed it was the slider that he ha pinpoint control of innings 2-5.  He pretty much was going knee high outside corner and a little further out for the chase.  That pitch was virtually unhittable.   I was pleasantly surprised by the 92-96 velocity as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

This is a really good offseason to buy pitching and I am guessing that the costs will stay down more because of that.

Best pitcher willing to sign for 3 or less years is on the table. Flaherty, because he’s only going to be 28, probably can set himself to get more than 3 years if he ends the year strong.

But he has had durability issues the last several years, so it may be an issue for him to get a longer deal.

Who would you be most excited to land in FA?

For me it's Julio Urias. His slightly elevated ERA this year may keep his price more reasonable and his peripherals still seem near elite to me.

I'd also love to keep Flaherty.

Edited by bluedog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, bluedog said:

Who would you be most excited to land in FA?

For me it's Julio Urias. His slightly elevated ERA this year may keep his price more reasonable and his peripherals still seem near elite to me.

I'd also love to keep Flaherty.

Snell is my guy but really, anyone who is taking 3 years or less that has good to very good upside. I don’t want another Gibson/Lyles type guy.

Unless we see a lot of trades or injuries, I think there is only one open rotation spot next year.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Snell is my guy but really, anyone who is taking 3 years or less that has good to very good upside. I don’t want another Gibson/Lyles type guy.

Unless we see a lot of trades or injuries, I think there is only one open rotation spot next year.

It will be very interesting to see what the O's do with Means, Kremer, Bradish, Wells & GRod already in the fold. It's not my preference, but I can imagine a scenario (Means pitches really well end of this year and next spring) where Elias goes with that group of 5 starters.

If they do sign a Snell or Urias (or Flaherty) then someone from that group misses out unless they go to a six man rotation. Wells to the pen is a possibility, but given how he pitched up to the last 3 starts, I expect he wouldn't be happy with that role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, bluedog said:

It will be very interesting to see what the O's do with Means, Kremer, Bradish, Wells & GRod already in the fold. It's not my preference, but I can imagine a scenario (Means pitches really well end of this year and next spring) where Elias goes with that group of 5 starters.

If they do sign a Snell or Urias (or Flaherty) then someone from that group misses out unless they go to a six man rotation. Wells to the pen is a possibility, but given how he pitched up to the last 3 starts, I expect he wouldn't be happy with that role.

Here’s the thing with Wells, how much can you trust him? The last few years he has gotten hurt and missed time. This year, it’s signs of fatigue at only 100 IP.

You figure this will get better but it’s hard to keep relying on him even if he is good. 
 

I go into next year with the assumption that GRod, Bradish and Means have a spot.

Then you can probably  count on 1 spot from Kremer or Wells and maybe if a guy like Povich or McDermott wow you the rest of this year and in ST, they can beat those guys out. And, of course, we just don’t know what to think for Hall. I know the conventional wisdom at this point is reliever only and that is probably correct but obviously the Os see something with him where they have doubted that. Do they still?  We don’t know but he could play a role here.

So I think it’s one spot for a vet starter with very good upside and there are several of those available this offseason and Flaherty is certainly one of those guys.

 

Edited by Sports Guy
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

Here’s the thing with Wells, how much can you trust him? The last few years he has gotten hurt and missed time. This year, it’s signs of fatigue at only 100 IP.

You figure this will get better but it’s hard to keep relying on him even if he is good. 

I agree, but does Elias? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Baltimorecuse said:

I saw a blogger saying the O's had Flaherty use his cutter more.  

The PitcherList write up highlighted that too - cutter bump from ~10% to ~30% by their reckoning, but this may be one of those classification things and the (not that big) difference between a cutter and a slider.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Just Regular said:

The PitcherList write up highlighted that too - cutter bump from ~10% to ~30% by their reckoning, but this may be one of those classification things and the (not that big) difference between a cutter and a slider.

It could have been more a matter of the opposition instead of a change in his overall approach.

I wouldn't read a lot into one game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I too was *this* pissed off yesterday. I'm sympathetic. But the reality of the situation is that Kansas City played out of their minds defensively and baseball happened.  Now, this was a microcosm of the second half of the season and that's just a fact. They dealt with injuries, just like every team does... they just didn't deal with them very effectively. I'm not sure if casting blame upon the hitting coaches or Hyde really holds any water for me. But I understand the desire for a scapegoat. It was REALLY hard to watch batter after batter trying to hit a 13 run home run on pitches that weren't really all that close to the strike zone. They were way out of their lanes and it was patently obvious that panic was setting in. I felt like it was a basketball game and Hyde needed to call a timeout or something. Like they needed to be snapped out of it or something, maybe by something drastic like, oh, putting Jackson Holliday in there for an at bat in an important spot.  They hit a lot of balls at guys, they swung at bunch of BS repeatedly. I saw it from Mountcastle, Santander, Henderson, Cowser (embarrassingly so), McCann during game 1, Rutschman too.  The only thing I could maybe blame Hyde for is not successfully alleviating the panic. Baseball's different though... I'm just a slapdick fan, I have no idea what the realities of his job are. But that lineup needed to find a way to relax and the further the game went the more they freaked out. It was the opposite of a loose dugout. It was fear, panic and foreboding doom. Is it even possible to snap that group out of it? I dunno. The veterans were the ones (other than Mullins) that were pressing the most. I think I would have found a way to get Holliday or Kjerstad some meaningful at bats. Yeah, maybe that's Monday morning quarterbacking. Maybe they would have reacted the same way the rest of them did.  They couldn't have been worse...  
    • Ok I’m changing this a little. Don’t know O’Hearn is worth the 8 mil.. Maybe we can replace. I’m actually pretty juiced at the potential of this and all of these guys are overdue for regular ABs together.    CF Mullins 3B Westburg C Adley SS Gunnar LF Cowser DH O’hearn/Mayo 1B Mountcastle  RF Kjerstad 2B Holliday Util: Mayo (regular DH platoon, spot starts in the field, Mateo (speed/defense)  
    • Honestly, they need to fix the right field wall too.  It is too ridiculous and screws with the right-handed hitters.  Move it in 10 feet and lower it a bit.
    • I said it before, and I'll say it again. This Royals team is entirely a function of their starting pitching (Ragans, Lugo, Wacha, Singer) and their recent BP arm pickups/conversions (Erceg, Bubic, Lynch, etc.). Their offense is basically Witt, Pasq, and Perez. I was pretty confident that the O's could shut them down going into this series, and they did. They only scored 3 runs. And none of their run scoring hits were all that amazing...if at all. The issue, of course, was the offense. Was that because of the pitching? Personally I thought Ragans looked hittable. He pitched better than Lugo, but the O's came up tiny in RISP situations. Same as yesterday. Ragans and Lugo mostly pitched out of the zone, and the O's just were aggressive. So, in this regard, give the credit to the Royals scouts and analytics teams. They knew exactly how to pitch to Santander: up, up, up. They knew exactly how to pitch to Cowser: low changeups. They knew exactly how to pitch to everybody not named Cedric Mullins. This Royals club is half decent, and if this O's club was the 2023 team, they shellack them. Alas, here we are. Think the Yankees are going to railroad these guys if they aren't rusty. 
    • He was developed according to the Orioles'  development plan.
    • Ryan Mountcastle avoiding getting hit in his dick with a pitch while trying to hold up his swing was infuriating.  
    • For the most part, no. The biggest thing a manager does is the culture they set and what they do off the field.  By all accounts, the players like Hyde, the culture is good and the team is happy with him. Now, if there is something there that we don’t know about, by all means make the change. However,  if every report is true, I see no reason to make a change. That’s making a change just to make a change. I would rather focus on the on field than assume some ceremonial change at manager is going to matter. Its been studied and we have talked about it a lot but in game strategy is so similar that its really only a game or two in terms of “manager WAR”.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...