Jump to content

Hays' CF Defense


CaptainRedbeard

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

This isn’t about Cowser v. Kjerstad - in fact, it’s the opposite. It’s about whether Hays can play CF effectively enough that we don’t need to devote a roster spot to a backup CF like McKenna, so that we can accommodate both Cowser and Kjerstad. 

While we have Hicks it doesn’t matter, because he’s probably a better CF than Hays and a good enough hitter. But between these choices when Mullins is out of the lineup, which is better?

1. Hays CF, Cowser LF, Kjerstad RF or DH

2. McKenna CF, Hays LF, Cowser or Kjerstad RF or DH (with the other of Cowser/Kjerstad in AAA)

I know I like #1 better. For next year certainly and for September & playoffs if we don’t have Hicks. 

A lot of folks will point to the advanced stats and will be overly critical of Hays as an OF. He looks perfectly capable to me on the defensive side of the ball though in all three outfield spots and a lot of us forget that he came through the system as a CF and had it not been for Mullins breaking out a few years back, it would have been Hays in center.

I think he's fine to man center for short stretches but I also think that by putting him out there you have to expect that he's going to play more aggressive and his risk of injury increases.

As far as the two options that you posted, defensively McKenna in CF, Hays in LF and Cowser in RF is the best alignment if Ced is not in the lineup. 

Cowser can play center but as much as I have argued that he is capable of playing out there (he is) McKenna is a better defensive CF, when he's not dropping balls and his focus is in the game. 

I don't think that we will ever see an outfield alignment with both Kjerstad and Cowser playing out there together. Kjerstad is destined for 1B. If we think that Cowser looks iffy in the OF, or Ant.. Kjerstad is going to be a tick below Ant. You can put him out there and he's not going to completely butcher your D but he's also not going to do you any favors. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

It does cost a 40 man slot.  I don't think that should be a deal breaker but it is a factor.

And Kjerstad is Rule 5 eligible this offseason, so it only burns the 40-man slot right now. They have a number of candidates who could be removed (or moved to the 60-day IL). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CaptainRedbeard said:

And Kjerstad is Rule 5 eligible this offseason, so it only burns the 40-man slot right now. They have a number of candidates who could be removed (or moved to the 60-day IL). 

I know, and I'm not disagreeing with you.

But GM's tend to value their 40 man slots.  I think Elias has shown a tendency in the past to keep flotsam around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, banks703 said:

A lot of folks will point to the advanced stats and will be overly critical of Hays as an OF. He looks perfectly capable to me on the defensive side of the ball though in all three outfield spots and a lot of us forget that he came through the system as a CF and had it not been for Mullins breaking out a few years back, it would have been Hays in center.

I think he's fine to man center for short stretches but I also think that by putting him out there you have to expect that he's going to play more aggressive and his risk of injury increases.

As far as the two options that you posted, defensively McKenna in CF, Hays in LF and Cowser in RF is the best alignment if Ced is not in the lineup. 

Cowser can play center but as much as I have argued that he is capable of playing out there (he is) McKenna is a better defensive CF, when he's not dropping balls and his focus is in the game. 

I don't think that we will ever see an outfield alignment with both Kjerstad and Cowser playing out there together. Kjerstad is destined for 1B. If we think that Cowser looks iffy in the OF, or Ant.. Kjerstad is going to be a tick below Ant. You can put him out there and he's not going to completely butcher your D but he's also not going to do you any favors. 

Defensively of course it’s better if McKenna is playing, but he has to hit too! I think the difference between his bat and Cowser/Kjerstad more than makes up for the loss of defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, banks703 said:

I don't think that we will ever see an outfield alignment with both Kjerstad and Cowser playing out there together. Kjerstad is destined for 1B. If we think that Cowser looks iffy in the OF, or Ant.. Kjerstad is going to be a tick below Ant. You can put him out there and he's not going to completely butcher your D but he's also not going to do you any favors. 

If Kjerstad can play an acceptable RF then it makes much more sense to leave 1B open for Mayo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Maybe he'll provide more value in a position he's barely played than he does at the position he's played his whole life?

He was playing CF in SD before we got Jim. Don't know how many reps but with his speed and arm it makes sense to try before DFS. He could be Util IF and  OF for 1 roster slot

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hays would be fine in center field.  IF you watch TV or even a game in person, you probaby are not watching the outfielder at the time the ball is pitched and then batted.  Hays and McKenna both, are starting their run as the ball is hit. They get up to speed quickly and have fluid running motions. They take the proper path to the ball and make a lot of catches in stride wtihout having to lunch the last 10 feet.  Left field in Camden Yards is now huge and if you can play left, you can play center. 

An interesting read. Note the comment that center is the easiest position to play because of the nature of balls hit there. .https://probaseballinsider.com/baseball-instruction/outfield/outfield-2-tracking-fly-balls/

Interesting: where do balls to the outfield go?https://www.pitcherlist.com/going-deep-batted-ball-direction-and-baseball-savants-xstats/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mateo as the backup CF is pretty much the only way he can stay on the roster next season if they don’t trade another infielder.  Maybe he can give you about Ryan McKenna value out there, and is a more valuable bench piece otherwise because of SS and pinch runner? But they won’t really need him as a SS and he’s such a bad hitter that the defensive bar for him will be very high for that to make sense. 

Still much rather have Hays as the backup CF and use that roster spot on a better player. Or if they want a better defensive CF, get a better overall player than Mateo or McKenna from outside the organization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

So...dud Hays get badly hurt on the catch in the ninth?

Hopefully just road rash from sliding across the Dura Trax. Was glad he could catch it and thrilled he didn't have to head first it and rake hands over the crushed stone, but geez... Must not feel great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I too was *this* pissed off yesterday. I'm sympathetic. But the reality of the situation is that Kansas City played out of their minds defensively and baseball happened.  Now, this was a microcosm of the second half of the season and that's just a fact. They dealt with injuries, just like every team does... they just didn't deal with them very effectively. I'm not sure if casting blame upon the hitting coaches or Hyde really holds any water for me. But I understand the desire for a scapegoat. It was REALLY hard to watch batter after batter trying to hit a 13 run home run on pitches that weren't really all that close to the strike zone. They were way out of their lanes and it was patently obvious that panic was setting in. I felt like it was a basketball game and Hyde needed to call a timeout or something. Like they needed to be snapped out of it or something, maybe by something drastic like, oh, putting Jackson Holliday in there for an at bat in an important spot.  They hit a lot of balls at guys, they swung at bunch of BS repeatedly. I saw it from Mountcastle, Santander, Henderson, Cowser (embarrassingly so), McCann during game 1, Rutschman too.  The only thing I could maybe blame Hyde for is not successfully alleviating the panic. Baseball's different though... I'm just a slapdick fan, I have no idea what the realities of his job are. But that lineup needed to find a way to relax and the further the game went the more they freaked out. It was the opposite of a loose dugout. It was fear, panic and foreboding doom. Is it even possible to snap that group out of it? I dunno. The veterans were the ones (other than Mullins) that were pressing the most. I think I would have found a way to get Holliday or Kjerstad some meaningful at bats. Yeah, maybe that's Monday morning quarterbacking. Maybe they would have reacted the same way the rest of them did.  They couldn't have been worse...  
    • Ok I’m changing this a little. Don’t know O’Hearn is worth the 8 mil.. Maybe we can replace. I’m actually pretty juiced at the potential of this and all of these guys are overdue for regular ABs together.    CF Mullins 3B Westburg C Adley SS Gunnar LF Cowser DH O’hearn/Mayo 1B Mountcastle  RF Kjerstad 2B Holliday Util: Mayo (regular DH platoon, spot starts in the field, Mateo (speed/defense)  
    • Honestly, they need to fix the right field wall too.  It is too ridiculous and screws with the right-handed hitters.  Move it in 10 feet and lower it a bit.
    • I said it before, and I'll say it again. This Royals team is entirely a function of their starting pitching (Ragans, Lugo, Wacha, Singer) and their recent BP arm pickups/conversions (Erceg, Bubic, Lynch, etc.). Their offense is basically Witt, Pasq, and Perez. I was pretty confident that the O's could shut them down going into this series, and they did. They only scored 3 runs. And none of their run scoring hits were all that amazing...if at all. The issue, of course, was the offense. Was that because of the pitching? Personally I thought Ragans looked hittable. He pitched better than Lugo, but the O's came up tiny in RISP situations. Same as yesterday. Ragans and Lugo mostly pitched out of the zone, and the O's just were aggressive. So, in this regard, give the credit to the Royals scouts and analytics teams. They knew exactly how to pitch to Santander: up, up, up. They knew exactly how to pitch to Cowser: low changeups. They knew exactly how to pitch to everybody not named Cedric Mullins. This Royals club is half decent, and if this O's club was the 2023 team, they shellack them. Alas, here we are. Think the Yankees are going to railroad these guys if they aren't rusty. 
    • He was developed according to the Orioles'  development plan.
    • Ryan Mountcastle avoiding getting hit in his dick with a pitch while trying to hold up his swing was infuriating.  
    • For the most part, no. The biggest thing a manager does is the culture they set and what they do off the field.  By all accounts, the players like Hyde, the culture is good and the team is happy with him. Now, if there is something there that we don’t know about, by all means make the change. However,  if every report is true, I see no reason to make a change. That’s making a change just to make a change. I would rather focus on the on field than assume some ceremonial change at manager is going to matter. Its been studied and we have talked about it a lot but in game strategy is so similar that its really only a game or two in terms of “manager WAR”.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...