Jump to content

Sonny Gray to St Louis


Rustbelt

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, TommyPickles said:

I'd like to see them target Shoto Imanaga now.

I think we'd all like that, but there's been no indication that the Orioles will engage in posting fees since the last time PA said they wouldn't. So, it's overwhelmingly likely they will not engage in posting fees. Can you see John Angelos paying an additional fee on top of a contract? Ain't no way. That would hurt the (false) narrative that we're a small market team and things like posting fees are an unfair advantage to big market teams.

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wildcard said:

75M is more of a commitment than the O's made to their whole team last year.   I am not expecting they will sign any contracts like that this off season.

Exactly. I'll say it again: 2/$24. 

That happens to be exactly what Maeda got, and that's the type of guy I think we'll end up with. Wacha got 1/$7.5 last year and pitched well with a low ERA and low WHIP. Only 130 IP and hasn't made more than 24 starts since 2017, but that's kind of why he's affordable. I think a team like the O's could grab him on something similar to 2/$24. 

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, interloper said:

I think we'd all like that, but there's been no indication that the Orioles will engage in posting fees since the last time PA said they wouldn't. So, it's overwhelmingly likely they will not engage in posting fees. Can you see John Angelos paying an additional fee on top of a contract? Ain't no way. That would hurt the (false) narrative that we're a small market team and things like posting fees are an unfair advantage to big market teams.

I've never understood why the posting fee per se should be a dealbreaker. Even for a cheapskate owner, all that should matter is the total cost. Kind of like "50% OFF SALE" doesn't really mean anything if the original price was marked up double. The posting cost may be an "extra fee" but it affects the overall market price. If you thought Japanese players were systematically overpaid as a result that would be one thing, but I don't think the evidence bears that out, even considering the posting fees. 

Of course, I agree, we should expect more of the same until proven otherwise, but it makes zero sense. Maybe Elias could talk them out of such a stupid position. He did get them to invest in an international system. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, interloper said:

I think we'd all like that, but there's been no indication that the Orioles will engage in posting fees since the last time PA said they wouldn't. So, it's overwhelmingly likely they will not engage in posting fees. 

The whole posting system has changed dramatically since Angelos made that remark.  It used to be like an auction, now it’s more like a tax.   It’s much more feasible for the Orioles to participate in the current system.   You just adjust what you’re willing to pay downward to account for the tax.  It’s the same calculus for any team.  I’m not saying the O’s will bid on any of these players, but the posting fee shouldn’t stop them, it should just affect what they’re willing to pay the player.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Bummer. Really didn't expect STL to be the highest bidder after the moves they have already made. They must really hate their pitching prospects. 

Their lineup is pretty darn good. We saw that when they came here late in the season. They just had terrible SP and bullpen. Given their factors… already locked into big deals, weak division, they’re choosing to spend their way out versus doing a rebuild. Makes sense for them. 

Notice how all these SP they are signing are innings eaters. That’ll lessen the load on their bullpen.

Realistically, we’re not getting any big name FA. And why would we?  We just need a crafty trade for a guy like Jose Quintana. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I mean more notable for anything. It's been around 60 years and you don't even have a State Senator or CEO to crow about?
    • If Mayo and Holliday are here next year, one of them most certainly has to move to the OF. There is only one position available. Henderson, Westburg, and Mountcastle are all starting caliber INFs. For a team who is trying to win a WS (like I assume the goal will be again next season) I don't see the wisdom in introducing too much possible volatility at one time due to the variance in performance that young players (first time big leaguers can produce). To have a lineup where Holliday, Mayo, (Kjerstad and Norby for that matter) are all trying to acclimate/figuring out how to hit big league pitching all at the same time does not seem like a wise move and it definitely doesn't seem like something Elias would do. I'm not sure that I see this is a move that would be ultra-risky or a move that would be for a rebuilding team. We are obviously going to be in the postseason and we could go all the way. If we were to turn around after a successful season and then jettison all vets and go with a rebuild lineup with half or more being occupied with young players prospects, I think it would come with a lot of negative PR and most likely a negative fan reaction. Teams who are successful and have young stars/cornerstone players under multiple years of control/contract (Rutschman, Henderson) don't typically decide to rebuild/reset in the midst of that. That could be detrimental to the teams bottom line and that would be a hard sell to an owner who has just taken over the team.
    • Yes, Boras clients occasionally sign extensions.  No, Boras won’t prevent a client that wants to sign an extension from doing so.  Yes, Boras clients sign fewer pre-FA extensions than clients of other agencies (based on comparing his share of pre-FA extensions vs. his larger share of MLB players). That’s because of either the advice he gives, attracting clients with a similar philosophy, or both. Scott has never signed a player with less than two years of service time to a long-term extension.  He has only signed 1 pre-arb player to a long-term extension which was 13 years ago (Carlos Gonzalez). Expectations of signing Gunnar or Westburg to extensions need to be calibrated against this reality.  
    • A.J. Preller is apparently a good talent evaluator and an aggressive GM.   I get the feeling he thinks they can keep replacing prospects through the draft and J2 signings.   He’s kind of painted himself into a corner with the current team.  He traded for Arráez.   The Padres were already rumored to be interested in Crochet.  I wouldn’t put it past Heller.  Of course, Crochet isn’t a rental so it’s not quite selling your soul to the devil to trade an Ethan Salas for him.  Not sure what else they have to offer.
    • I didn't really know either until the news of his death, which was kind of a lightbulb moment for me in relation to the extreme all-in approach the Padres had been taking in recent years. The family has kept a lot of details private, but from reading a couple of the articles after he passed, he had already gone through a couple of different tough cancer fights and it was known around the industry that his health was tenuous. I don't know if he got a specific prognosis before the end, but it seems clear that he wasn't taking any time for granted and wanted to push to make things happen while he could. It's not really relevant for the O's, but it has come up now and then when some folks start asking why the O's couldn't try to spend like the Padres - it's clear now that the Padres were in a unique situation.
    • No, but my family should get a good dose.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...