Jump to content

The Angelos appreciation thread


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

Peter wasn’t really a baseball guy. His interest was in doing something for Baltimore."

John Moag-Sun

This pretty much sums it up for me-that Peter and then John were never baseball fans-they don't care about and love the game the way we do. Their interest was in the symbiotic relationship the franchise had with the city for which most of us could care less.  It will be nice to have an owner that knows and enjoys the game-who places building a consistent contender over concerts and community outreach programs.

I think Peter-like most would like to be judged on his intentions rather then the results but in my mind his legacy isn't the good he thought he was doing rather the dysfunctional mess he created.  

Edited by SemperFi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, dedwretched said:

Thanks for '96 and '97. That's it.

The Macphail/Duquette years with Buck were good while it lasted.  I got to go to a playoff win!  We swept the Verlander/Scherzer/Price Tigers!  That's not nothing.  Some teams haven't had that kind of success that recently, and we're already back near the top.

  

15 hours ago, ChipTait said:

Eli Jacobs was the owner when the team moved to Camden Yards.  He's the reason for "Oriole Park" at Camden Yards...

Oops.  Some article I read the other day credited Angelos and I was too young to remember.  I stand corrected!

Edited by blid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SemperFi said:

Peter wasn’t really a baseball guy. His interest was in doing something for Baltimore."

John Moag-Sun

I used to know John Moag pretty well when he was a partner in my law firm.  I’d love to pick his brain about everything that happened here.   I’m sure he’s very well plugged in to it all.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, webbrick2010 said:

Sad that we keep old people alive by "all" means even after they are in vegetative state.

Pray that the Angelos family finds peace in Peters eventual passing and removed from the stress of baseball team ownership

I think they just found a few billion reasons to find peace.  

Money doesn't buy happiness but I think I'd rather be rich and miserable than broke and unhappy.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/31/2024 at 8:56 AM, DrungoHazewood said:

I appreciate that you weren't quite as destructive an owner as Bob Irsay or John Fisher. I appreciate that you didn't move the team to DC or Nashville or whatever, in the middle of the night in a Mayflower van. I appreciate that roughly 12 month period in the 1990s when you thought you'd like to out-spend the Yankees, before you decided that was a terrible idea and that you'd much rather have the 11th-highest payroll for the 29th-best team. I appreciate that it was just that one time you demanded that the team's #1 prospect be traded after a couple of poor outings for a 36-year-old middle reliever who'd go on to sell out half the team to PED investigators. I appreciate that you stepped up and paid top dollar, by far the largest contract in team history, for a 30-year-old first baseman who'd hit .196 the year prior. I appreciate that you let Dan Duquette do whatever he needed to do to build a winning team for a few years, just so long as that didn't involve spending real money, re-signing Manny, or investing in the farm system. I appreciate your stick-tuitive-ness in your MASN lawsuit, which I believe is now older than my kid who's a sophomore in high school and has helped limit the player payroll and competitiveness of two different MLB teams. I appreciate that you stuck to your principles and refused to sign any international free agents for years and years for some... reasons... that escape me. I appreciate your business savvy in identifying that there are no ways to acquire players outside of draft picks at slot that meet a reasonable ROI, so the Orioles won't use them.

So, thanks, Pete.

Now this is how you appreciate someone like Angelos! lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, ChosenOne21 said:

I think it needs not be lost in here that Peter Angelos is a bad baseball owner but a good man. We can be glad him and his family don't own the team anymore, I certainly am, but he wasn't some kind of failed human.

I'm not sure any of us can know that for sure. Just because he gave money to charity or helped people out here and there, does not necessarily make him a good man. There are plenty of stories that would indicate he was a shallow, spiteful man at times who at the slightest bit of "unloyal behavior" would ensure that they were fired. There have been other stories written about him at times where some of his charity donations were politically motivated or virtue signaling vs doing amazing things for the people of the city.

At the same time, I don't know him personally so I can't say that he's not a good guy. 

What we can all say is that he was a terrible, terrible owner.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SemperFi said:

I think Peter-like most would like to be judged on his intentions rather then the results but in my mind his legacy isn't the good he thought he was doing rather the dysfunctional mess he created.  

Following my rule for no politics....Is.....very......hard......when......this....explains...so...much...about....what....happens...in....cities....across... this... country!!! 

But I agree. I do think some of the stands that Peter took early on as owner were because he thought he was doing something good.

Like his refusal to feed into the whole Buscone system in the DR because it took advantage of young talented boys and uneducated families while enriching rich men. Was he wrong in that assessment, probably not, but when everyone else plays in that system you can't just stand on principle without consequences for your baseball operations. The consequences for the Orioles is they basically ignored an entire talent pipeline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Like his refusal to feed into the whole Buscone system in the DR because it took advantage of young talented boys and uneducated families while enriching rich men. Was he wrong in that assessment, probably not, but when everyone else plays in that system you can't just stand on principle without consequences for your baseball operations. The consequences for the Orioles is they basically ignored an entire talent pipeline.

I actually admired him for taking that stand and refusing to field a scab team during the strike.  Those issues were a matter of principle for him.  Refusing to play in a corrupt international market certainly hurt the team's ability to develop talent, but MLB profited from an immoral practice, IMO.

Edited by NCRaven
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

I actually admired him for taking that stand and refusing to field a scab team during the strike.  Those issues were a matter of principle for him.  Refusing to play in a corrupt international market certainly hurt the team's ability to develop talent, but MLB profited from an immoral practice, IMO.

Defector did a "better hate an owner," article on Angelos and the vibe of it was that Angelos seemed like a decent enough guy that was on the right side of a lot of history. One steelworker quoted in an article said something along the lines of: "Peter Angelos was the only one standing up for us." That is a lot of good intentions that led to terrible executions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, webbrick2010 said:

Sad that we keep old people alive by "all" means even after they are in vegetative state.

Pray that the Angelos family finds peace in Peters eventual passing and removed from the stress of baseball team ownership

You rather the pillow over the face method?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • If you want to see how young superstars should play, look at Churios and Merrill. Both big time contributors to their teams in the post season, both players 20 and 21 years of age. Meanwhile, our Jackson doesn’t even get an AB. Something is just off with this organization and their development..
    • I agree with some of the opening post. I cannot blame Hyde for this team not hitting. I believe it is completely analytical based. Analytics are against singles, walks, hit and run or bunts.    I know we can pick our guy to be upset with but I will go with Tony Taters. Adley hit a single to RF and with the right effort and baserunning he should have been on third base. Don’t have to talk about the terrible AB with the bases loaded. There was another play with the Massey single in the second that rubbed me the wrong way. The ball was hit 73 MPH and landed 250 feet. The RF wall is 325 feet away so how far is he playing back against Michael Massey? Tony did not strike me of a guy giving it everything he had to get to a fly ball. He basically assumed Mullins would get it and jogged in. 
    • I would have taken this loss harder in the past guess I'm getting older. Also this team has been telegraphing for over a half season how this season would end. I don't want to hear stats on how many runs this team scored it's a lineup that lives and dies by the home run. The problem is the weather cools in October and the ball doesn't carry as well in summer at OPACY. The Orioles actually got good pitching, but the offense came up small yet again. Elias needs to rethink the types of hitters he has on the Orioles roster and evaluate the effectiveness of having two hitting coaches. There's even an offensive strategy coach and what exactly does he do? "Hey Adley next time you get up the plate try not to make an out".
    • Completely agree and there's no reason the O's shouldn't be a serious player for Soto.  Him and one top starter and I'm happy.
    • Add a couple of seasoned professionals who know how to win. Solid players who have been around a while. These young guys are talented for sure, but that’s not enough. They need to learn to play better as a team and know what it takes to win consistently.  I honestly think they get caught up in reading about how good they are, not proving it on the field day after day.
    • Except Cruz wasn’t an overpay. He’s the rare older free agent that actually earned his money. By the way, Cruz was the 55th highest paid player when he signed his FA deal after he played for the Orioles. He wasn’t even that expensive.    But that’s just an aside. I understand what you’re saying and your point is valid. I’m just still irked that the Orioles basically punted in that offseason that Cruz walked. I hope they are fiscally brave enough to take the next step and not count on Holliday and Mayo to improve next years team. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...