Jump to content

Poll - How often do you bet on the Orioles?


sportsfan8703

How often do you bet on the Orioles on a weekly basis?   

77 members have voted

  1. 1. On a weekly basis? Private Poll. Nobody will see what you voted for.

    • Never
      64
    • 1
      5
    • 2-3
      1
    • 4+
      5
    • Usually every game
      3


Recommended Posts

  • sportsfan8703 changed the title to Poll - How often do you bet on the Orioles?
27 minutes ago, Philip said:

Gambling isn’t my thing, but I think it’s going to become a big problem when relievers get anonymous calls before the big game.

Sports betting isn't new. There was more likelihood of that happening 50 years ago when it was run by illegal operations.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet on baseball.   Typically about $10 a game.   Or to win $10 with a favorite.

This year my record is 178-181, for +$85.80.   The reason I am ahead for the year even though I have lost more bets than I have won is because I tend to bet underdogs a lot more than favorites.   I understand baseball and know that even the best teams don't win much more than 60% of the time.   So you have a favorite that is -200 (means you have to bet $200 to win $100, or in my case $20 to win $10) -- you'll just never see me make a bet like that.   Your team has to win 67%  of the time just to break even on bets like that, and over 70% of the time to make any noticable profit.

I like, and think I am good at, finding underdogs that have close to a 50/50 chance to win.   If I can get a medium strength underdog, say +140 (in my case bet $10 to win $14), and can win that half the time, or even a little less than half the time, I can come out ahead.   And my results this year show I can do that.  I also made a couple hundred bucks last year, but lost a couple hundred in 2022.   I don't exclusively bet underdogs but I'd guess they are at least 60 to 65% of the bets I make.   And when I bet favorites they tend to be the smaller favorites (-150 or less) that you don't need to win over 60% of the time just to break even on.

Anyway, long story short... you can see I have made an average of about 4 bets a day over the course of the season so far.   Some days I won't find any games I like, I think the most I have done in one day this year is 10.   How many of those are on the Orioles?   Well, this year, not too many.   Because we are typically a pretty big favorite and as described I am not a big favorite bettor.   But I'm sure I have bet on the Orioles somewhere between 10-15 times over the course of the season.    I'm at work now where I can't check my spreadsheet.   

So I'm going to answer #1 on the poll, that seems about right.

I never bet against the Orioles.   Even in situations where I think it might be a good play based on the odds.   I have friends who I discuss handicapping with, some are not Oriole fans, so I will recommend to them an anti-Oriole play when I think it is warranted but I won't do it myself.

In 1998, Virginia Tech was in the top 25 and playing lowly Temple and we were 37 point favorites.   But our starting QB was out, and I knw the backup was pretty bad, and I knew Frank Beamer would probably not likely run up the score.   So I bet on Temple +37.

Hokies led 17-0 at the end of the first quarter but totally fell apart, made all kinds of mistakes let Temple stay in the game, and finally Temple pulled off the upset and won outright.   I won my bet easily, but I was at the game and it was one of the worst upsets in college football history (I think at the time 37 points was the 2nd biggest underdog ever to win outright, no idea how many times it has been topped since).

So after that experience I have never bet against any of my favorite teams.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Sports betting isn't new. There was more likelihood of that happening 50 years ago when it was run by illegal operations.

Sports betting isn’t new, but MLB involvement, heavy advertising on every Baseball site, and potential fraud made easier by the internet certainly are.

There has already been at least one article about players being threatened after a loss cost someone a lot of money.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last baseball bet for me was 1983, I bet five bucks with a good friend who was a Phils fan. Dude still owes me five dollars.

Other than that, I am just not a gambler, the times I did felt like setting cash on fire would have been more fun. That aside, I lean into not judging my friends and family who enjoy betting and/or gambling. I tend to believe folks can choose whatever they want to do, provided it isn’t harmful to them or others. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I learned my lesson in my late teens; a high school friend of mine was a big gambler, and I placed a few bets through his bookie on some MLB games (this was the late ‘80s when you needed bookies). I was down $50 from the first game and my team in the second game was up a run in the 9th. I was nervous as hell the whole time. Mattingly hit a walk-off homer, and I lost another $50. I said, “This isn’t for me”, and never bet on baseball again. I just want to enjoy the game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DirtyBird said:

Sports betting isn't new. There was more likelihood of that happening 50 years ago when it was run by illegal operations.

Just because something has become legal doesn't mean there still aren't criminals involved in that activity...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • You do know that Gunnar is hitting .290? Rustchman .300? O'Hearn .283? Westburg .282? Mountcastle .276? Watch the games much?
    • @Filmstudy that you for the detail on why you don't believe that Robert is a good fit. I tend to agree. 1. Cedric is finally coming out of his funk. 2. (And I know you don't put much stock into what coaches and FO personnel say publicly based on your excellent Raven's content) But Elias just about stated outright yesterday during his media appearance in Norfolk that all of his interest in acquisitions would be as he called it "on the pitching side".  3. Our offense is already # 1 in the sport as is. However, our pitching has not been very good since we have been forced to go with Suarez, Irvin, and Povich as the #3, 4, 5 options. IMO that combo over a long stretch of time will put a serious strain on the bullpen AND you really would not your chances of defeating multiple teams in the playoffs with any of them getting starts in every round (some times in pivotal/possible elimination games). IMO pitching is the real need/where the weaknesses lie.  4. I just wanted to give a shout out for your devotion to the belief in platoons...lol... But if the O's did acquire Robert by some chance, there is literally less than a ZERO chance that he would be used as a platoon player.
    • It's a partially elastic collision, so the EV reduction is going to be a little less than the velocity reduction from a thrown baseball.   I also think that hitters would eventually adjust and there would be more hitters in the mold of Luis Arraez, that focus on hitting soft line drives with a 65 mph bat speed.  Either way the BABIP of a whiff is .000 so I think baseball is better served seeing more batted balls even if BABIP is slightly depressed due to a reduction in EV.  Launch angle is also a large component to BABIP and batters can still square the ball up to maximize their chances.  And since a heavier ball will move less, it should be easier to square it up.
    • Let me know if you get to the North Country, tickets!
    • He'll be fine, I'm always somewhat skeptical about defensive scouting reports.  I think that ME hasn't given him OF reps-not even in ST which tells me they aren't seriously considering moving him off the dirt.  As @Tony-OH noted he's had 3 errors on his last ~40 games-no one seems to be worried about Hollliday who at 2B has made 10 in the same time period.
    • This is dependent on the idea that the amount of energy delivered is somewhat constant.  In practice I think that while there would be some velocity reductions, the limitations are more on the raw velocity, and pitchers would be able to compensate with stronger arm or leg muscles.   My reasoning here is based on NFL combine numbers; a decent number of QBs are able to hit 60+ MPH, while there are like 2 pitchers in all of MLB that are able to exceed 102 MPH (which is what you would need to match the energy of a 60 mph football.)   I do think that it would cause fatigue faster among starters, unless they paced themselves more, so starter velocity would probably go down by theoretical number, while reliver velocity might only go down 1 mph or not at all.   A heavier ball will reduce spin-induced movement too, and will (likely) reduce the amount of spin pitchers can impart (though this has the same caveat as above with pitchers adapting with larger muscles.)  So even if velocity only goes down a little bit the reduced movement should make the ball easier to hit.
    • I'd like to thank Burnes' wife for hanging on until the weekend.  It's less obvious than another pothole.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...