Jump to content

Ubaldo Jimenez Today 2015


Il BuonO

Recommended Posts

Think Ubaldo pitched much better than his line. He wasn't getting ANYTHING on the lower part of the strike zone.

I didn't see the game. Was de Gross getting the low calls? He had plenty of Ks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 273
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Ubaldo got squeezed big time tonight. Especially in the 2nd. Lead off BB. Then IF popup, followed by a K. Then BB and seeing eye single that went right under Cabrera's glove. Basically he shouldn't have given up a run in the 2nd.

I kept wishing he'd had the benefit of the previous game's home plate umpire. Obviously, he didn't have his secondary pitches and was trying to survive with just the fastball, but I thought he looked better than Bud the night before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was wondering about that strike zone. Many times, what looked to be a strike on Ubaldo's part was called a ball.

There weren't a ton of egregious calls where a clear strike was called a ball, but IMO he almost got zero calls his way on anything on the edges of the zone. Basically he was 0-fer on almost every 50-50 ball.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

21 OUTS: 9 Strikeouts, 6 Groundouts (Including 2 Double Plays), 2 Flyouts, 2 Lineouts

UBALDO JIMENEZ O(vs. BLUE JAYS. 5/11)

IP:o 7

H:). 6 (3 Doubles, 3 Singles)

R:lo 2

BB: l2

SO: l9

Pitches: 109 (71 Strikes, 38 Balls)

2015 ERA: 2.41

PITCHES BY INNING

****************

17 (11 Strikes, 6 Balls)

16 (91 Strikes, 7 Balls)

81 (61 Strikes, 2 Balls)

14 (91 Strikes, 5 Balls)

16 (10 Strikes, 6 Balls)

13 (91 Strikes, 4 Balls)

25 (17 Strikes, 8 Balls)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he can give us 7 innings like that every game that would be amazing. Seems to be pitching more than throwing these days. He is more worried about location and movement than he is velocity which is what he needs to do at this point in his career. His fastball seems to have some real good late movement and if he can keep it down in the zone then he can be very effective. If his breaking ball is on and he can locate it then it makes him a very tough guy to hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ubaldo was spot on tonight. We truly needed it, we needed a strong performance by our starting pitcher and we got just what we needed. I noticed on the velocity-meter that his fastball tops at 91 or so. But he has made adjustments to his loss of velocity. This is one of many things that he worked on in the bullpen last fall, during the winter and during ST. His work is showing results.

The Grand Poobah of the Ubaldo Jimenez Fan Club :smile11: :clap:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

21 OUTS: 6 Strikeouts, 5 Groundouts, 4 Flyouts, 4 Lineouts, 1 Foulout, 1 Thrown Out Stealing

UBALDO JIMENEZ O(vs. ANGELS, 5/16)

IP:. 7

H:;; 7 (7 Singles)

R:O 2

BB: 0

SO: 6

Pitches: 92 (63 Strikes, 29 Balls)

2015 ERA: 2.43

PITCHES BY INNING

****************

10 (81 Strikes, 2 Balls)

10 (81 Strikes, 2 Balls)

81 (61 Strikes, 2 Balls)

17 (15 Strikes, 2 Balls)

14 (81 Strikes, 6 Balls)

13 (71 Strikes, 6 Balls)

20 (11 Strikes, 9 Balls)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a little disappointed. I woke up this morning thinking he had a shot at a no hitter. I still think it will happen this year.

Sargent in Arms of the Ubaldo Jimenez Fan Club! :clap3::clap:

Welcome back, Sargent in Arms. It was a pitcher's duel for 6 innings, with Ubaldo and his team leading 1-0. But a few misplayed balls, one solid Angel's hit, and the offense failing to come up with key hits. Ubaldo left after 6 innings, behind 2-1. After that, the bullpen pitched some batting practice. Believe me, Ubaldo deserved a far better fate than this. But the defense and hitters let the team down, and this was the result. :(

Hopefully, he'll do well next time and so will the defense and the offense.

The Grand Poobah of the Ubaldo Jimenez Fan Club :clap3::clap:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

13 OUTS: l* l5 Groundouts, 4 Strikeouts, 1 Foulout, 1 Popout, 1 Flyout, 1 Lineout

UBALDO JIMENEZ O(vs. MARLINS, 5/22)

IP:. 4

H:;; 7 (7 Singles)

R:l) 3

BB: 1

SO: 4

Pitches: 87 (59 Strikes, 28 Balls)

2015 ERA: 2.82

* One of Jimenez' strikeouts reached safely on a dropped 3rd strikes, hence Jimenez essentially had to get 4 outs in the 4th inning.

PITCHES BY INNING

****************

16 (14 Strikes, 21 Balls)

31 (21 Strikes, 10 Balls)

23 (13 Strikes, 10 Balls)

17 (11 Strikes, 61 Balls)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He wasn't bad tonight. Maybe not great. And pulled early in a stupid NL game. This is frickin' baseball? I paid money to see some rookie meat pitcher flailing away trying to bunt????? :ohlord:

I watched on TV but you get my point....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He wasn't bad tonight. Maybe not great. And pulled early in a stupid NL game. This is frickin' baseball? I paid money to see some rookie meat pitcher flailing away trying to bunt????? :ohlord:

I watched on TV but you get my point....

Eh. He might have had one more inning. Not much more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • No.  Nor are they going to lead the O's to the AL East cellar next week.  Elias is going to need to get some pitching, nobody is arguing otherwise.
    • Exactly this. While I appreciate he could be the guy, they are loaded at MIF. The more I watch Westburg the more I'm convinced he IS a dude. Calling up Mayo to play 3B I'm only slightly hesitant about because I've read regarding his defense. Westburg looks more comfortable at third to me, but I love that he's played 2B at a high level as well. Nice to have so many options.
    • I’d rather see him in CF vs second base but I’m not sure we see that transition or not. I guess it depends on how comfortable they are with doing it at the ML level and in the offseason…because he won’t be in the minors for much longer.
    • No earthly way I trade 6 years of a top 20 prospect, catcher or first base, for 2.5 years of a guy who has made 17 major league starts.
    • I never said that and do not believe any of that as Rubenstein didn't even have control of the franchise at that time. And you better believe that if it was still in Angelos hands he would not allow Rubenstein much of any input until ALL of the risk/liability was transferred to Rubenstein. I love your use of the word "methodical" there to describe John Angelos. I have some of other words for it - cheap, miserish, greedy, moneygrubbing, tightwad, terrible, awful ... just to name a few...lol
    • I think the vast majority of people think that playoffs in any professional sport is a crap shoot. I also don't think you'll find anyone on this board that doesn't want to make any additions to this roster. I just take issue with an argument that says there is no way the Orioles could win the WS with their pitching staff. That's over the top and hyperbolic. Just over the past few years, there have been teams that won the WS with pitching staffs that were as good or worse that the Orioles.  '21 Braves starters 3.84, BP 3.97 '19 Nats 3.53, 5.68 '18 Red Sox 3.77, 3.72 '17 Astros 4.03, 4.27 '15 Royals 4.34, 2.72 '13 Red Sox 3.84, 3.70
    • That's the problem with using your top draft choices to draft the best player available: you can end up with an imbalance that makes it difficult to use all the talent you've got. You can reduce the problem by drafting shortstops, many of whom can move to the right along the defensive spectrum, but they can't all do that. And they can't pitch. You can fix an imbalance of talent by trading talented guys who are likely to be blocked by other, more talented guys. But if you're not willing to do that . . .
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...