Jump to content

Jorge Mateo


RZNJ

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, MurphDogg said:

I kept forgetting to throw this into this thread. I know how divisive many here find Keith Law, so I thought people would enjoy this.

In a chat on August 1st, Law was asked whether Mateo's success should be a factor in the long term positions of Gunnar Henderson and Jordan Westburg. Rather than simply answering no (which is in my opinion the obvious correct answer), He  goes out of his way to say how little he thinks of Jorge Mateo.

"Jorge Mateo is not a major league caliber regular. He's roster chum.

The best SS currently playing in the Orioles' system is Ortiz. The best 3b is Henderson. Westburg could move to 2b or slide around multiple spots."

I admit that I am more down on Mateo than others in this thread as I don't see him as a long term regular on a competitive team, given that he is already 27-years-old. However, he is certainly a Major League player, would be an elite utility infielder / pinch runner on any playoff bound team and wouldn't kill a team's chances if he were penciled in as option A at shortstop and as a #9 hitter in the short term (over the next couple seasons). The idea that he is roster chum is laughable at best.

Keith Law digs his heels in and continues to be obnoxious and abrasive. Yawn…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MurphDogg said:

I kept forgetting to throw this into this thread. I know how divisive many here find Keith Law, so I thought people would enjoy this.

In a chat on August 1st, Law was asked whether Mateo's success should be a factor in the long term positions of Gunnar Henderson and Jordan Westburg. Rather than simply answering no (which is in my opinion the obvious correct answer), He  goes out of his way to say how little he thinks of Jorge Mateo.

"Jorge Mateo is not a major league caliber regular. He's roster chum.

The best SS currently playing in the Orioles' system is Ortiz. The best 3b is Henderson. Westburg could move to 2b or slide around multiple spots."

I admit that I am more down on Mateo than others in this thread as I don't see him as a long term regular on a competitive team, given that he is already 27-years-old. However, he is certainly a Major League player, would be an elite utility infielder / pinch runner on any playoff bound team and wouldn't kill a team's chances if he were penciled in as option A at shortstop and as a #9 hitter in the short term (over the next couple seasons). The idea that he is roster chum is laughable at best.

Keith Law is baseball analyst chum. 

Edited by tntoriole
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The statement that Jorge Mateo is not a major league caliber regular is so wrong it’s laughable. 
 

we can debate his ceiling but he’s very much holding his own as a regular all season. What reason is there to believe that Ortiz will hit any better than Mateo has?  A 50 game track record at AA?  If you’re going to play better D than Mateo, than you’re winning multiple good gloves. Is Ortiz definitely going to do that?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel the need to comment on the stupidity of Mateo’s dash home last night.  He was safe by inches, but that’s beside the point.   Down 4-0 in the 9th, you don’t risk making an out to make the score 4-1.   He really needs to be aware of the situation there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Show us on the doll where the Orioles hurt you, Keith Law. 

Mateo has held his own this year against the likes of Correa, Bo Bichette, Tim Anderson, J.P. Crawford, and other highly valued shortstops. I guess Law is saying his 2022 performance is a fluke, because his value has been undeniable. And he has consistently been one of the most exciting players to watch that we have had in years. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MurphDogg said:

I kept forgetting to throw this into this thread. I know how divisive many here find Keith Law, so I thought people would enjoy this.

In a chat on August 1st, Law was asked whether Mateo's success should be a factor in the long term positions of Gunnar Henderson and Jordan Westburg. Rather than simply answering no (which is in my opinion the obvious correct answer), He  goes out of his way to say how little he thinks of Jorge Mateo.

"Jorge Mateo is not a major league caliber regular. He's roster chum.

The best SS currently playing in the Orioles' system is Ortiz. The best 3b is Henderson. Westburg could move to 2b or slide around multiple spots."

I admit that I am more down on Mateo than others in this thread as I don't see him as a long term regular on a competitive team, given that he is already 27-years-old. However, he is certainly a Major League player, would be an elite utility infielder / pinch runner on any playoff bound team and wouldn't kill a team's chances if he were penciled in as option A at shortstop and as a #9 hitter in the short term (over the next couple seasons). The idea that he is roster chum is laughable at best.

I think Law's assessment was pretty harsh.  But on July 1st Mateo's career OPS was .611, and as you noted he's 27.  At that point he's, at best, a Cesar Izturis, Belanger-lite kind of player.  Someone who could stick around for a while as a glove-only SS, or a utility player.  But probably not a regular on a good team.

His last six or seven weeks have been much better, but we'll see.  He had a .748 OPS for 32 games for the O's last year sandwiched between a few hundred PAs of sub-.600.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I feel the need to comment on the stupidity of Mateo’s dash home last night.  He was safe by inches, but that’s beside the point.   Down 4-0 in the 9th, you don’t risk making an out to make the score 4-1.   He really needs to be aware of the situation there.  

Not a good play percentage wise.  Not supposed to risk it there.   With that being said, the announcers kind of said the same thing but much nicer.   However, earlier in the year when McKenna tried taking 3rd with 2 outs and made it in a very close play as well, he was praised for his hustle.

On the wild pitch it's a instinct split second decision but he should have thought about it before the pitch.  Can't go there unless you are guaranteed to make it standing up with no play on you.

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I feel the need to comment on the stupidity of Mateo’s dash home last night.  He was safe by inches, but that’s beside the point.   Down 4-0 in the 9th, you don’t risk making an out to make the score 4-1.   He really needs to be aware of the situation there.  

I think he was trying everything humanly possible to fire up his team. Despite the near perfecto that was still a winnable game which is why we had Omar warming in the pen just in case.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Frobby said:

I feel the need to comment on the stupidity of Mateo’s dash home last night.  He was safe by inches, but that’s beside the point.   Down 4-0 in the 9th, you don’t risk making an out to make the score 4-1.   He really needs to be aware of the situation there.  

On the other hand, his dash home in *last* night's game was nothing short of sensational. Infield in, Nevin smashes it on a hop right to the drawn in SS. Mateo goes on contact, SS makes a great throw that nails 99% of baserunners.

That play in the prior game looked close but that was only because the pitcher covering never caught the ball. The ball got behind the catcher. We are 99-to-1 to lose that game whether he gets thrown out or not. I know it's not the smart play but I'm really not going to beat him up for going on that one. More like "if you're going to run you better make it." 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

On the other hand, his dash home in *last* night's game was nothing short of sensational. Infield in, Nevin smashes it on a hop right to the drawn in SS. Mateo goes on contact, SS makes a great throw that nails 99% of baserunners.

That play in the prior game looked close but that was only because the pitcher covering never caught the ball. The ball got behind the catcher. We are 99-to-1 to lose that game whether he gets thrown out or not. I know it's not the smart play but I'm really not going to beat him up for going on that one. More like "if you're going to run you better make it." 

I wonder why the SS would be drawn in in that situation.  An out seems more important than a run there.  In fact, why throw it home?  Seems like a defensive lapse in judgment, imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Frobby said:

I feel the need to comment on the stupidity of Mateo’s dash home last night.  He was safe by inches, but that’s beside the point.   Down 4-0 in the 9th, you don’t risk making an out to make the score 4-1.   He really needs to be aware of the situation there.  

In the post-game interview, Hyde says "we run on contact a lot" due to the team speed. So I wouldn't blame Mateo on this one - it's likely he was told to run on contact regardless of where the ball was hit. 

Edited by interloper
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, interloper said:

In the post-game interview, Hyde says "we run on contact a lot" due to the team speed. So I wouldn't blame Mateo on this one - it's likely he was told to run on contact regardless of where the ball was hit. 

Frobby was talking about the wild pitch in the 9th inning of Sunday's game not running on contact last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Number5 said:

I wonder why the SS would be drawn in in that situation.  An out seems more important than a run there.  In fact, why throw it home?  Seems like a defensive lapse in judgment, imo.

As long as the infield is drawn in, going home is definitely the right play. They got exactly the ball they wanted there just as the defense was designed to do. Problem was, the O's had the wrong guy on third and he flat out beat it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

As long as the infield is drawn in, going home is definitely the right play. They got exactly the ball they wanted there just as the defense was designed to do. Problem was, the O's had the wrong guy on third and he flat out beat it. 

If the defender fields and throws cleanly he's out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Good question. I did a very fast search — last news is the DFA, but nothing on whether he accepted it or is now a FA. 
    • I expect to win against the Orioles to win against any and all opponents. We have the better team against anyone and our rotation is not chopped liver. Reds have some good young starting pitching no doubt. But their lineup leaves a lot to be desired.
    • Yeah, not my favorite lineup as Santander is too high based on his performance at this time. don't like McKenna starting, especially at the same time as Urias in also in the lineup.  Just too many holes in this lineup that way, not that Mullins has been tearing it up, but I trust him more than McKenna for sure, even with a lefty out there.   But like last time when I said such a thing, watch us score 8-9 runs.  🙂   
    • Mullins has been struggling and there is a lefty on the mound today.
    • Oh sure, I'm very confident in Elias picking this low as I feel they do a good job of identifying what they like,  and it doesn't have to be just the top guys.  I won't be surprised at all if whomever they take ends up being better than expected for the slot they are picked in the end.   But it's just harder for me to keep up as the guy they draft is very unlikely to be someone I know much about.   When we are picking top 2-5 you really only needed to study 4 to 7 guys or so to be fairly certain you knew about who our guy would be.   Now there are probably 30ish guys who COULD go at number 22.  The top 10 will likely be gone and the guys after #40 or so won't be likely, but anyone in the 11 to 40ish range could be the pick of some fall or rise on our boards.  I'll be watching it closely on draft day,  but until then it's just too speculative to really dive into IMO. I do wonder how much harder it is to prepare for this kind of a draft as an organization.   When you are picking top 5, you can really narrow the focus down on 7-8 guys and really dive in deep to decide your board and who you take if available.  With being in the low 20s, you need to research many,  many more guys but probably not in nearly the depth you did while picking higher. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...