Jump to content

Correa opts out…should the Os pursue him?


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

He didn’t opt out to get a 4 year deal.

Exactly. I wouldn’t go after him. He’s looking at 6-8 years, I assume. Defense should decline and while he’s a good hitter, I don’t see him as a hitter worthy of 35M+ for a substantial period of time. I’d focus on short term deals for a SP at a high AAV. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carlos Correa - all 875 MLB starts in the field at shortstop

Gunnar Henderson - positioned at shortstop in ~65% of Minors games by his Club.

The wear and tear on shortstops is cumulative and I can't rule out that the Orioles have a better mousetrap protecting Gunnar Henderson's joints for the long haul.     It'd be a distinctive development pattern, compared to how MLB shortstops are mostly trained.

Certainly it'll be good news for the long haul if in three years Henderson, Westburg, Ortiz, Hernaiz and Holliday are all among the planet's 30 best shortstops that summer.     Bring on the trades!

The Tejada deal way back when was mid-December.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, clapdiddy said:

I just commented about this on the "3 Moves" thread.

I would pursue him.  Would 4/130 do it?

He just opted out of a deal that was going to pay him $35M for each of the next two years. I'd guess it's going to take at least 6/210, and that's before teams with deep pockets start a bidding war. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I wouldn’t go after him at all.  I wanted him last year but things have changed since then.

Gunnar looks like he can be a good SS.  Ortiz has Re-established himself.  You drafted Holliday because he’s a SS.

Just don’t see the logic behind doing it…not anymore.

This is exactly where I'm at. I just don't see the need after adding Gunnar. Spend the money on pitching instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I wouldn’t go after him at all.  I wanted him last year but things have changed since then.

Gunnar looks like he can be a good SS.  Ortiz has Re-established himself.  You drafted Holliday because he’s a SS.

Just don’t see the logic behind doing it…not anymore.

I thought he made sense last offseason, but this is it: Things have changed for the franchise.  Not least of which is the performance of the man you failed to mention: Jorge Mateo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Pickles said:

I thought he made sense last offseason, but this is it: Things have changed for the franchise.  Not least of which is the performance of the man you failed to mention: Jorge Mateo.

Mateo isn’t a consideration for me, which is why I didn’t mention him.

But sure, his presence for the 2023 season could be argued as another reason.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Mateo isn’t a consideration for me, which is why I didn’t mention him.

But sure, his presence for the 2023 season could be argued as another reason.

Well I think you undervalue him but he's one, of a few, bridge options to Holliday, and one must assume that Holliday is the long term plan at SS, and he's only a few years away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Traded for Bradish, traded for Irvin, traded for Burnes, traded for Flaherty, list can go on.
    • Pablo Sandoval was pretty good for a five or six year stretch. Prince Fielder was a fat slob as was his dad. John Kruk was not  remotely athletic and had a good career. Surprisingly, Andruw Jones was not what I would consider an elite athlete but is probably the best defensive centerfielder of the last 30 years. No, being an elite athlete is not required to be a good baseball player. 
    • I wonder what your scouting report of Bobby Witt Jr was in 2022.
    • I think they are trying to tune the robo ump to more closely match the called MLB zone.  The AAA robo ump zone isn't 100% accurate to the rulebook zone, and while the called MLB zone isn't either, it's quite a bit closer.  Specifically balls fading out of the zone are more likely to be adjudged balls by the robo-ump because they're only checking pitch location on a plane at the midpoint of home plate, so for example, a curveball that clips the front of the zone, then drops below it when crossing the midpoint of home plate, would be called a ball by the current robo-ump, but is a strike by the rulebook.
    • Perhaps people shouldn't get personal with you, but you do bring it on yourself. You say outlandish things, presumably to troll, get called on them and then double, triple, quadruple, etc down until people take shots at you.
    • ??? The only sports where people peak younger than 20 is stuff like womens gymnastics and figure skating, where women have to delay puberty in order to maintain a body type ideal for the sport.  Nearly every other sport's athletes  peak between 22-27.
    • Ok several of you want to compare JH to Gunnar.  I am happy to do so: JH is 20 years old and has a .909 OPS at AAA after putting up a .941 OPS as a 19 year old at four levels. As a 20 year old Gunnar had a .826 OPS across three levels, .944 at A, .775 at A+ and .561 at AA (5 games) Even at 21 Gunnar went back to AA for almost half a season and his OPS at AA was .894 I am not saying JH will be as good as Gunnar but people saying we should trade for some pitcher we could have for a year or two have lost touch with common sense.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...