Jump to content

2023 Ongoing Lineup Thread


Ripken

Recommended Posts

Just now, EdwinRip said:

Love being able to move Mateo all around to get his bat in the lineup.

Haha, not quite how I'd word it!  ;)  But if they are going to keep Mateo on the team, then I'm glad he's getting some reps in CF.  I trust his athleticism to play a plus defense there.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, waroriole said:

Well this is annoying. If he can’t hit enough for SS, why can he hit enough for CF? Also where is Hays?

 

Hays appeared to have spiked himself making that sliding catch in the 9th on Friday. But I agree with you regarding Mateo. It’s like the Orioles brass are addicted to him for some unknown reason, they keep inventing news ways to give him more rope.

However, I do like that they finally appear to be committing to leaving Henderson as the everyday SS. That should be his position until further notice i.e. he proves that he can’t handle it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

Hays appeared to have spiked himself making that sliding catch in the 9th on Friday. But I agree with you regarding Mateo. It’s like the Orioles brass are addicted to him for some unknown reason, they keep inventing news ways to give him more rope.

However, I do like that they finally appear to be committing to leaving Henderson as the everyday SS. That should be his position until further notice i.e. he proves that he can’t handle it.

I think it's NSFW, haven't listened to it in years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

Hays appeared to have spiked himself making that sliding catch in the 9th on Friday. But I agree with you regarding Mateo. It’s like the Orioles brass are addicted to him for some unknown reason, they keep inventing news ways to give him more rope.

However, I do like that they finally appear to be committing to leaving Henderson as the everyday SS. That should be his position until further notice i.e. he proves that he can’t handle it.

So, Gunnar at SS, who is the 3B next season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, btdart20 said:

As much as I like Rogers' style, lyricism, musicality, etc... he's got a terrible voice.  And this song only highlights that!  :) Carry on...

Just because I post a piece of music does not mean I necessarily like that piece of music.

Amused To Death has some good songs, I don't think Too Much Rope is one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

So, Gunnar at SS, who is the 3B next season?

Westburg? Maybe Holliday at 2B? Keep Urias as utility. 

Holliday can still get a few reps at SS when Henderson rests or when he occasionally is at DH.

I’m not really a believer in platooning top tier guys like some posters. I’m more in the Atlanta Braves philosophy of player usage - let the best players play, especially when you have guys this young. I want my best guys (non-catchers playing 145-155 games) getting 600/plate appearances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

Because McKenna has options and they like Mateo.

I don’t know what McKenna has to do with it. I get that they like Mateo but there’s no justification for it. He can’t hit. And his defense isn’t elite, other than last year. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Orioles0615 said:

Barring Injuries if Hyde ever puts out this kind of lineup in the playoffs he should be fired

Do you really think the thought process for a playoff lineup and a Sunday day game after night game lineup are even remotely similar?  I’m not sure what the point of a statement like this is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, waroriole said:

I don’t know what McKenna has to do with it. I get that they like Mateo but there’s no justification for it. He can’t hit. And his defense isn’t elite, other than last year. 

I think the point in bringing up McKenna was that he can be sent down when Mullins is ready and Mateo cannot. Clearly, they are not ready to lose Mateo from the organization just yet, which they almost certainly will if they try to get him through waivers. And it’s only 26 more days until they get a couple extra roster spots to play with, so it makes sense not to lose a player if you don’t have to, regardless of how most posters here view Mateo and his future contributions. If Mateo can cover CF as a backup, it greatly lessens or downright eliminates the need for McKenna. 
 

Half this board was ready to dump Mountcastle a few weeks ago, so I’m content to let the front office decide when it’s time to cut bait with Mateo. 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, waroriole said:

I don’t know what McKenna has to do with it. I get that they like Mateo but there’s no justification for it. He can’t hit. And his defense isn’t elite, other than last year. 

This is damning with faint praise but McKenna is a better hitter than Mateo.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I too was *this* pissed off yesterday. I'm sympathetic. But the reality of the situation is that Kansas City played out of their minds defensively and baseball happened.  Now, this was a microcosm of the second half of the season and that's just a fact. They dealt with injuries, just like every team does... they just didn't deal with them very effectively. I'm not sure if casting blame upon the hitting coaches or Hyde really holds any water for me. But I understand the desire for a scapegoat. It was REALLY hard to watch batter after batter trying to hit a 13 run home run on pitches that weren't really all that close to the strike zone. They were way out of their lanes and it was patently obvious that panic was setting in. I felt like it was a basketball game and Hyde needed to call a timeout or something. Like they needed to be snapped out of it or something, maybe by something drastic like, oh, putting Jackson Holliday in there for an at bat in an important spot.  They hit a lot of balls at guys, they swung at bunch of BS repeatedly. I saw it from Mountcastle, Santander, Henderson, Cowser (embarrassingly so), McCann during game 1, Rutschman too.  The only thing I could maybe blame Hyde for is not successfully alleviating the panic. Baseball's different though... I'm just a slapdick fan, I have no idea what the realities of his job are. But that lineup needed to find a way to relax and the further the game went the more they freaked out. It was the opposite of a loose dugout. It was fear, panic and foreboding doom. Is it even possible to snap that group out of it? I dunno. The veterans were the ones (other than Mullins) that were pressing the most. I think I would have found a way to get Holliday or Kjerstad some meaningful at bats. Yeah, maybe that's Monday morning quarterbacking. Maybe they would have reacted the same way the rest of them did.  They couldn't have been worse...  
    • Ok I’m changing this a little. Don’t know O’Hearn is worth the 8 mil.. Maybe we can replace. I’m actually pretty juiced at the potential of this and all of these guys are overdue for regular ABs together.    CF Mullins 3B Westburg C Adley SS Gunnar LF Cowser DH O’hearn/Mayo 1B Mountcastle  RF Kjerstad 2B Holliday Util: Mayo (regular DH platoon, spot starts in the field, Mateo (speed/defense)  
    • Honestly, they need to fix the right field wall too.  It is too ridiculous and screws with the right-handed hitters.  Move it in 10 feet and lower it a bit.
    • I said it before, and I'll say it again. This Royals team is entirely a function of their starting pitching (Ragans, Lugo, Wacha, Singer) and their recent BP arm pickups/conversions (Erceg, Bubic, Lynch, etc.). Their offense is basically Witt, Pasq, and Perez. I was pretty confident that the O's could shut them down going into this series, and they did. They only scored 3 runs. And none of their run scoring hits were all that amazing...if at all. The issue, of course, was the offense. Was that because of the pitching? Personally I thought Ragans looked hittable. He pitched better than Lugo, but the O's came up tiny in RISP situations. Same as yesterday. Ragans and Lugo mostly pitched out of the zone, and the O's just were aggressive. So, in this regard, give the credit to the Royals scouts and analytics teams. They knew exactly how to pitch to Santander: up, up, up. They knew exactly how to pitch to Cowser: low changeups. They knew exactly how to pitch to everybody not named Cedric Mullins. This Royals club is half decent, and if this O's club was the 2023 team, they shellack them. Alas, here we are. Think the Yankees are going to railroad these guys if they aren't rusty. 
    • He was developed according to the Orioles'  development plan.
    • Ryan Mountcastle avoiding getting hit in his dick with a pitch while trying to hold up his swing was infuriating.  
    • For the most part, no. The biggest thing a manager does is the culture they set and what they do off the field.  By all accounts, the players like Hyde, the culture is good and the team is happy with him. Now, if there is something there that we don’t know about, by all means make the change. However,  if every report is true, I see no reason to make a change. That’s making a change just to make a change. I would rather focus on the on field than assume some ceremonial change at manager is going to matter. Its been studied and we have talked about it a lot but in game strategy is so similar that its really only a game or two in terms of “manager WAR”.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...