Jump to content

Grayson Rodriguez 2023


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

That one yesterday will serve as a driver for him to keep working harder.  And he will.  Many big time pitchers have had a bad start in postseason.  It happens.  The really great ones take from it what they can and then go back to working harder. 
 

His fastball percentage was really high compared to all his starts since he came back.  He only used that changeup 11 times and had 7 whiffs.  Early in the year, he would get hit, get rattled and then get away from throwing offspeed.  He had much better mix in good starts since then.  Some of that is on Adley a bit too to try to keep his mix better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I don’t think it’s correct to say the moment is too big for him. I think that’s poor wording that has a far more negative connotation to it than needee.

It’s absurd to think he needs a shrink because of this outing. It’s not absurd to think he was too amped up though. I think rust was a bigger issue but we won’t know for sure.

Fair enough. That's a valid opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tntoriole said:

That one yesterday will serve as a driver for him to keep working harder.  And he will.  Many big time pitchers have had a bad start in postseason.  It happens.  The really great ones take from it what they can and then go back to working harder. 
 

His fastball percentage was really high compared to all his starts since he came back.  He only used that changeup 11 times and had 7 whiffs.  Early in the year, he would get hit, get rattled and then get away from throwing offspeed.  He had much better mix in good starts since then.  Some of that is on Adley a bit too to try to keep his mix better. 

It was the prepared game plan. That's what was set up as their way of approaching the Rangers who are one of the best off-speed hitting teams in the majors, if not the best. 

That's not on Adley. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 7Mo said:

It was the prepared game plan. That's what was set up as their way of approaching the Rangers who are one of the best off-speed hitting teams in the majors, if not the best. 

That's not on Adley. 

Same thing they did in May when he got crushed .. and same approach that sent him to the minors .. sometimes you have to go with your strengths, not what you think plays better to the other team.  
 

It is just so strange they went away from his mix of the very successful run he had.  And even in game  .. they could not touch his changeup.. 7 whiffs on 11 pitches .. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Btw, it’s also possible he sucks in the playoffs. We have seen it with all time greats like Kershaw and Maddux.

Verlander is in the WS.

We are assuming he will learn from this and he likely will but it’s not some impossibility that he ends up struggling as a playoff pitcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 7Mo said:

It was the prepared game plan. That's what was set up as their way of approaching the Rangers who are one of the best off-speed hitting teams in the majors, if not the best. 

That's not on Adley. 

Good thing they stuck with the game plan. Could have gotten ugly if they deviated from that based on what he was able to throw for strikes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were a bit too cute by half with Grayson. He should have been allowed to pitch how he normally does.  His stuff is good enough.  The bigger issue though was his fastball command was awful and the only effective secondary was his change.  That wasn’t going to get it done.  No pitcher goes 11 days without pitching during the course of the year.  It makes things extremely difficult.  Teams with 92+ wins are 0-8 in the playoffs and Atlanta is losing again to Phillu. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Btw, it’s also possible he sucks in the playoffs. We have seen it with all time greats like Kershaw and Maddux.

Verlander is in the WS.

We are assuming he will learn from this and he likely will but it’s not some impossibility that he ends up struggling as a playoff pitcher.

I wouldn’t lump Maddux (3.27 postseason ERA vs. 3.16 regular season) in with Kershaw (4.49 vs. 2.48).  Maddux did have some postseason struggles but he still pitched reasonably well there.  Kershaw has flat out sucked in the postseason. It’s obviously way too soon to worry about Grayson being a postseason Kershaw in the long run.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Btw, it’s also possible he sucks in the playoffs. We have seen it with all time greats like Kershaw and Maddux.

Verlander is in the WS.

We are assuming he will learn from this and he likely will but it’s not some impossibility that he ends up struggling as a playoff pitcher.

Nothing is impossible but don’t yup think one start in his rookie year is a little early to be concerned about this? Especially against an offense like Texas?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I wouldn’t lump Maddux (3.27 postseason ERA vs. 3.16 regular season) in with Kershaw (4.49 vs. 2.48).  Maddux did have some postseason struggles but he still pitched reasonably well there.  Kershaw has flat out sucked in the postseason. It’s obviously way too soon to worry about Grayson being a postseason Kershaw in the long run.  

If Rodriguez makes 32 postseason starts, I’d label it as one of those good problems.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, dystopia said:

Nothing is impossible but don’t yup think one start in his rookie year is a little early to be concerned about this? Especially against an offense like Texas?

I’m not even remotely concerned about it.

Just making the point that people saying he will learn from this and be fine, it may not be correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Fair enough. That's a valid opinion.

I like your take Tony! Lots of factors to consider, especially with the layoff comment being a factor.

Was surprised at the heat hitting 100. Add a little crafty pitch ability to Grayson’s experience and he is a true ace.
First year in the pros. Look at Schilling’s later rise. Grayson has the stuff and tenacity! Hope he bounces back as he has already proved this year!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Oh I see he meant it.  Wow, that’s an absurd opinion.

He hadnt pitched in 11 days. He walked 4 guys. One was on a pitch that was a clear strike and was called ball 4 and another was an obvious pitch around of Seager.

About 63% of his pitches went for strikes and if ball 4 to Carter was called a strike, that % jumps to 64.4%, which is above the league average.

He just didn’t throw enough quality strikes, especially with 2 strikes. They hit a lot of balls hard but they also found holes with those balls.  It happens especially when you are a little off and you had 11 days off. 

Ok, let's start with your label of my opinion as being absurd. Just because you don't agree with it doesn't mean it's absurd. Your continued tendency to name call and bully on this board is getting really tiresome. You get away with it because you post so much but it is offensive and, IMHO, detrimental to others sharing their opinions on this board. I read your posts and enjoy them for the most part. I think you are very knowledgable about the O's and baseball in general. Why you feel the need to name call and make others feel put upon is completely beyond me. I wish you would stop being a bully.

Secondly, everyone can see that, "He just didn't throw enough quality strikes..." The question is why did it happen in game 2 of the ALDS. Is it possible the pressure and his maladaptive response to it caused him to pitch poorly. He's a rookie for goodness sake. He's never pitched in that environment before. Of course the layoff had something to do with it. But the bottom line is other pitchers, (did you see what Pablo Lopez did?) handled their assignments without melting down. It happens. It is a learning experience.

If you don't agree with me, that's fine. Tell me you don't agree and tell me why. Don't tell me my opinion is absurd. That's condescending and frankly abusive. No one needs that from you or anyone else.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jim'sKid26 said:

Ok, let's start with your label of my opinion as being absurd. Just because you don't agree with it doesn't mean it's absurd. Your continued tendency to name call and bully on this board is getting really tiresome. You get away with it because you post so much but it is offensive and, IMHO, detrimental to others sharing their opinions on this board. I read your posts and enjoy them for the most part. I think you are very knowledgable about the O's and baseball in general. Why you feel the need to name call and make others feel put upon is completely beyond me. I wish you would stop being a bully.

Secondly, everyone can see that, "He just didn't throw enough quality strikes..." The question is why did it happen in game 2 of the ALDS. Is it possible the pressure and his maladaptive response to it caused him to pitch poorly. He's a rookie for goodness sake. He's never pitched in that environment before. Of course the layoff had something to do with it. But the bottom line is other pitchers, (did you see what Pablo Lopez did?) handled their assignments without melting down. It happens. It is a learning experience.

If you don't agree with me, that's fine. Tell me you don't agree and tell me why. Don't tell me my opinion is absurd. That's condescending and frankly abusive. No one needs that from you or anyone else.

 I know people hate the truth but if you are going to post something like that, with absolutely zero evidence, I’m sorry but that’s absurd imo. If I say something  you think is absurd, so be it. It’s not a big deal.

Tony mentioned maybe the moment is too big. I don’t agree with that label and the connotation of it but ok.  But taking it to the next step that he is some mental midget that needs therapy because of one start where he was off for 11 days is an absurd leap of judgement.  

In your post here, you talk of him being a rookie, learning experience, etc…notice how I’m not disagreeing with that or thinking it’s over the top?  You know why?  Because it’s not. Saying he needs therapy is. 

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I too was *this* pissed off yesterday. I'm sympathetic. But the reality of the situation is that Kansas City played out of their minds defensively and baseball happened.  Now, this was a microcosm of the second half of the season and that's just a fact. They dealt with injuries, just like every team does... they just didn't deal with them very effectively. I'm not sure if casting blame upon the hitting coaches or Hyde really holds any water for me. But I understand the desire for a scapegoat. It was REALLY hard to watch batter after batter trying to hit a 13 run home run on pitches that weren't really all that close to the strike zone. They were way out of their lanes and it was patently obvious that panic was setting in. I felt like it was a basketball game and Hyde needed to call a timeout or something. Like they needed to be snapped out of it or something, maybe by something drastic like, oh, putting Jackson Holliday in there for an at bat in an important spot.  They hit a lot of balls at guys, they swung at bunch of BS repeatedly. I saw it from Mountcastle, Santander, Henderson, Cowser (embarrassingly so), McCann during game 1, Rutschman too.  The only thing I could maybe blame Hyde for is not successfully alleviating the panic. Baseball's different though... I'm just a slapdick fan, I have no idea what the realities of his job are. But that lineup needed to find a way to relax and the further the game went the more they freaked out. It was the opposite of a loose dugout. It was fear, panic and foreboding doom. Is it even possible to snap that group out of it? I dunno. The veterans were the ones (other than Mullins) that were pressing the most. I think I would have found a way to get Holliday or Kjerstad some meaningful at bats. Yeah, maybe that's Monday morning quarterbacking. Maybe they would have reacted the same way the rest of them did.  They couldn't have been worse...  
    • Ok I’m changing this a little. Don’t know O’Hearn is worth the 8 mil.. Maybe we can replace. I’m actually pretty juiced at the potential of this and all of these guys are overdue for regular ABs together.    CF Mullins 3B Westburg C Adley SS Gunnar LF Cowser DH O’hearn/Mayo 1B Mountcastle  RF Kjerstad 2B Holliday Util: Mayo (regular DH platoon, spot starts in the field, Mateo (speed/defense)  
    • Honestly, they need to fix the right field wall too.  It is too ridiculous and screws with the right-handed hitters.  Move it in 10 feet and lower it a bit.
    • I said it before, and I'll say it again. This Royals team is entirely a function of their starting pitching (Ragans, Lugo, Wacha, Singer) and their recent BP arm pickups/conversions (Erceg, Bubic, Lynch, etc.). Their offense is basically Witt, Pasq, and Perez. I was pretty confident that the O's could shut them down going into this series, and they did. They only scored 3 runs. And none of their run scoring hits were all that amazing...if at all. The issue, of course, was the offense. Was that because of the pitching? Personally I thought Ragans looked hittable. He pitched better than Lugo, but the O's came up tiny in RISP situations. Same as yesterday. Ragans and Lugo mostly pitched out of the zone, and the O's just were aggressive. So, in this regard, give the credit to the Royals scouts and analytics teams. They knew exactly how to pitch to Santander: up, up, up. They knew exactly how to pitch to Cowser: low changeups. They knew exactly how to pitch to everybody not named Cedric Mullins. This Royals club is half decent, and if this O's club was the 2023 team, they shellack them. Alas, here we are. Think the Yankees are going to railroad these guys if they aren't rusty. 
    • He was developed according to the Orioles'  development plan.
    • Ryan Mountcastle avoiding getting hit in his dick with a pitch while trying to hold up his swing was infuriating.  
    • For the most part, no. The biggest thing a manager does is the culture they set and what they do off the field.  By all accounts, the players like Hyde, the culture is good and the team is happy with him. Now, if there is something there that we don’t know about, by all means make the change. However,  if every report is true, I see no reason to make a change. That’s making a change just to make a change. I would rather focus on the on field than assume some ceremonial change at manager is going to matter. Its been studied and we have talked about it a lot but in game strategy is so similar that its really only a game or two in terms of “manager WAR”.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...