Jump to content

Tuesday, June 27: Orioles vs Reds, again with some wet weather possible


SteveA

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Because the success rate won't be as high as you think it would be.

The all time leader, to include dead ball era, had 190 bunt singles, he was successful about half the time.

How much value is there in exchanging a regular at bat for a 50/50 chance at a single?  (assuming you could maintain that success rate)

I don't know where the 50/50 success rate for Brett Butler comes from. Does it include sacrifice attempts? I would think the success rate for an occasional, situational bunter with skill and speed, who's not sacrificing, is higher, and that success will often put a fast bunter on second. For a fast guy who's a crappy hitter like Mateo, I would think even a 30 or 40 percent success rate would be desirable. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

I don't know where the 50/50 success rate for Brett Butler comes from. Does it include sacrifice attempts? I would think the success rate for an occasional, situational bunter with skill and speed, who's not sacrificing, is higher, and that success will often put a fast bunter on second. For a fast guy who's a crappy hitter like Mateo, I would think even a 30 or 40 percent success rate would be desirable. 

 

What I read indicated that it was bunt attempts for hits.

I also will state again, bunting for a hit seems to be more difficult than fans think it is.  I give you the all time leader and you are "I think it's higher".  For the record Butler's success rate isn't the highest but he seemed like the best example to use.

Edited by Can_of_corn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • It's about where I'm at, too.  Football team hasn't won anything significant since 1991, I was 2 when the Orioles won the World Series.  I'm used to disappointment at best, irrelevance at worst. I say this now, but I'm sure that changes if we advance to play the Yankees.
    • Thank you! I just got moved to seats nearby my originals and got a $100 refund!
    • In 2022, Cleveland only drew 30,000 and 34,000 for the wild card series. The Mets also did not sell out all of their three games that year either. Granted, attendances should be better in 2024. I wouldn't take much out of it.
    • Good because I think they will win.  Uneasy because if they don't win, the season falls short of expectations, period. Win here, and lose against NYY or later in the postseason after putting up a good fight... that'll be disappointing, but far better than if they don't get through this series. 
    • I agree, but I also hope the Royals don't make me regret that!  If we play like we're capable, it won't matter.  If we play more like we did prior to the last week of the season, it also won't matter, but in a bad way.  Lets just get a couple early off Ragans and get this first one out of the way!
    • It sounds like the Diamondbacks aren't that interested in their relationship with Jordan Montgomery, who has a $22.5M player option for 2025 he figures to exercise. Elias would have to negotiate one of those James McCann buy-side things, but it sounds like Ken Kendrick, at the very least, isn't worried if the player will be a happy camper as a 2025 Diamondback. https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/41552657/d-backs-owner-blames-self-horrible-jordan-montgomery-add "If anyone wants to blame anyone for Jordan Montgomery being a Diamondback, you're talking to the guy that should be blamed," Kendrick told Arizona Sports. "Because I brought it to [the front office's] attention. I pushed for it. They agreed to it -- it wasn't in our game plan. You know when he was signed -- right at the end of spring training. And looking back, in hindsight, a horrible decision to invest that money in a guy who performed as poorly as he did. It's our biggest mistake this season from a talent standpoint. And I'm the perpetrator of that." I thought I read last winter when Gray went fast to St. Louis - in his mind it was his last contract for a team he always wanted to play for.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...