Jump to content

Kevin Brown


Srey

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

That was borderline insufferable too. 

Trying to figure out how to only block your Kevin Brown related posts, because I pretty much like and agree with most of the rest of your takes. Way off base on KB though and I think you’re just leaning into it at this point. 
 

LOL. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ThisIsBirdland said:

Just down 2-3 shots before the first inning like Gary would, and see where the night would take you.

 

I’m at the doctors office for some tests and guffawed when I read this.

God bless Gary Thorne.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Fiver6565 said:

Trying to figure out how to only block your Kevin Brown related posts, because I pretty much like and agree with most of the rest of your takes. Way off base on KB though and I think you’re just leaning into it at this point. 
 

LOL. 

I am leaning into it, a little bit.

Here's the deal, I don't think he's as bad as people think I think he is.  I've said it before, I'll say it again...as far as my favorite TV announcers go, it's Thorne, Mel Proctor, Kevin Brown, Jim Hunter Scott Garceau and Michael Reghi.  

Kevin Brown is right in the middle.  I actually like his voice a little bit.  On a pitch by pitch basis, he's good, though sometimes I don't think he knows the difference between a sinker a cut fastball, but that's whatever.  I don't need the PBP guy to tell me what I'm seeing when it comes to pitch types and I don't care if they miss one from time to time.

It's the constant attempts at being clever, the constant pointing out of trivial trivia ("And Adley Rutschman, the FIRST pick in the 2019 draft grounds out to the SECOND pick in the 2019 draft, Bobby Witt Jr.") that drive me crazy.  The pop culture references.  That sarcastic tone he takes on when he's trying to give Ben McDonald a hard time on something that Ben McDonald has never heard of before (What do YOU MEAN YOU'VE NEVER HEARD OF...) ...all those things drive me up a wall.

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Fiver6565 said:

I don’t get the complaining about random stories and jokes occasionally. It’s complaining just to complain. Listen to a few other local broadcasts on MLB TV. They all have a similar dynamic and all have silly sidetracks, from the PBP guy and a sideline reporter. Nothing unusual. And Kevin and Ben are far better than most, though there are some good tandems out there. 
 

Watching other teams play a little also puts the Os in perspective from several angles. All the issues you think the Os have (fifth starter, last guy on the bench, bullpen issues, whatever) I guarantee you fans of every team feel the same way about their team.  

The Rangers guys talk about baseball: history and trivia, and relating it to the current game. It’s really interesting. They also talk sometimes about vocabulary “was that an ‘egregious’ call?” And it’s very funny. The oriole guys would be lost in such a discussion. The banter needs to be natural but also pertinent. The orioles guys aren’t very good. I agree with Moose(or he agrees with me because I was down on KB from day 1) but we can live with them. I just wish they’d evaluate themselves better and make adjustments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Jeez, tough crowd.  I guess we’ll bring back Jim Hunter and his “modest three game hit streak.”   

Get it right, it's a modest two game hitting streak, Froberto Duran.
 

And nowhere did I say I'd prefer Jim Hunter over Kevin Brown.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

Get it right, it's a modest two game hitting streak, Froberto Duran.
 

And nowhere did I say I'd prefer Jim Hunter over Kevin Brown.  

I’m just reminding you there are worse alternatives.  Everything you’ve said about Brown is fair enough, though I happen to like things like the Rutschman grounder to Witt observation.

What I want in a TV PBP guy is:

1.  A good voice.  

2.  The ability to convey that the game is interesting, even when it’s not.  

3.  A good rapport with the color guy and the ability to use questions to get the color guy to use their expert knowledge of the game  and convey it to the audience.

4.  Knowing when it’s appropriate to get a little excited.  

5.  Being well prepared and knowing stuff about both teams that most viewers don’t, and inserting that information at opportune times.  

I score Brown very high on all five criteria.  Puns and cultural references, or the lack of them, aren’t on my list of what’s important.  



 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’m just reminding you there are worse alternatives.  Everything you’ve said about Brown is fair enough, though I happen to like things like the Rutschman grounder to Witt observation.

What I want in a TV PBP guy is:

1.  A good voice.  

2.  The ability to convey that the game is interesting, even when it’s not.  

3.  A good rapport with the color guy and the ability to use questions to get the color guy to use their expert knowledge of the game  and convey it to the audience.

4.  Knowing when it’s appropriate to get a little excited.  

5.  Being well prepared and knowing stuff about both teams that most viewers don’t, and inserting that information at opportune times.  

I score Brown very high on all five criteria.  Puns and cultural references, or the lack of them, aren’t on my list of what’s important.  



 

That's fair, and he does do those things well.  We can agree to disagree that the other stuff that we happen to disagree about gets in the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Just Regular said:

And here I was thinking his Hays-Holliday-Henderson Triple H mention was the moment of the night.

I enjoyed the green fry dip exchange.  Ben, the true red-blooded country Cajun, wanted nothing to do with the green fry dip.  KB is the chirpa of culinary progress!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

I am leaning into it, a little bit.

Here's the deal, I don't think he's as bad as people think I think he is.  I've said it before, I'll say it again...as far as my favorite TV announcers go, it's Thorne, Mel Proctor, Kevin Brown, Jim Hunter Scott Garceau and Michael Reghi.  

Kevin Brown is right in the middle.  I actually like his voice a little bit.  On a pitch by pitch basis, he's good, though sometimes I don't think he knows the difference between a sinker a cut fastball, but that's whatever.  I don't need the PBP guy to tell me what I'm seeing when it comes to pitch types and I don't care if they miss one from time to time.

It's the constant attempts at being clever, the constant pointing out of trivial trivia ("And Adley Rutschman, the FIRST pick in the 2019 draft grounds out to the SECOND pick in the 2019 draft, Bobby Witt Jr.") that drive me crazy.  The pop culture references.  That sarcastic tone he takes on when he's trying to give Ben McDonald a hard time on something that Ben McDonald has never heard of before (What do YOU MEAN YOU'VE NEVER HEARD OF...) ...all those things drive me up a wall.

 

Brown isn’t my favorite, but Gary Thorne isn’t walking through that door. Plus, I identify the recent winning with Kevin Brown’s voice. I just wish he wouldn’t have pulled his martyr stunt last year. Everyone has to listen to their boss. 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Brown isn’t my favorite, but Gary Thorne isn’t walking through that door. Plus, I identify the recent winning with Kevin Brown’s voice. I just wish he wouldn’t have pulled his martyr stunt last year. Everyone has to listen to their boss. 

What does this mean?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Brown isn’t my favorite, but Gary Thorne isn’t walking through that door. Plus, I identify the recent winning with Kevin Brown’s voice. I just wish he wouldn’t have pulled his martyr stunt last year. Everyone has to listen to their boss. 

I gotta give him credit, he handled that like an ace. I don’t think he did anything wrong in that situation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Philip said:

The Rangers guys talk about baseball: history and trivia, and relating it to the current game. It’s really interesting. They also talk sometimes about vocabulary “was that an ‘egregious’ call?” And it’s very funny. The oriole guys would be lost in such a discussion. The banter needs to be natural but also pertinent. The orioles guys aren’t very good. I agree with Moose(or he agrees with me because I was down on KB from day 1) but we can live with them. I just wish they’d evaluate themselves better and make adjustments.

I live in the SF Giants market.   Their broadcasting crew (Duane Kuiper, Mike Krukow, John Miller)  is very easy to listen to.  They have very interesting banter with a very dry humor.   They know the game well.   I like when they find things or people of interest in the crowd and discuss between pitches/ action.   They have worked with each other for so long and know each other so well that the chemistry is smooth.   They are a top notch crew. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Or the Williams sisters, but I doubt he'd mention girls.  
    • Possible? Sure. Yet, I'd be surprised by any trades in the divisions, unless it was considered a minor one.  I doubt Elias would want to see any of his prospects helping an AL East rival when he can get similar players elsewhere.
    • Tiger Woods, of course, standing as an excellent example of a guy who was precociously skilled at a sport at a very young age (because his dad made him play) but never quite got there as a pro. There’s some merit to what you’re referencing here. I would absolutely buy that his lifelong exposure to baseball is a significant factor in his success at a young age. But I think that type of thing is far more applicable when evaluating youth or high school, maybe college level players. At lower levels and younger ages, I suspect extreme advantages in experience, practice time, and hands-on coaching can absolutely give a less talented kid a leg up. However, I think there’s a ceiling for how far a ho-hum kid can go on the back of force-fed baseball obsession — and I’m pretty sure that ceiling is a lot lower than “excellent hitter at AAA at age 20.“ I think you have to have the goods to reach that level, no matter how much baseball your daddy exposed you to as a kid. Ceiling-wise, as I’ve said, I do think he’s probably lower than some of these absolute tool demons like Gunnar and Witt and Acuna. I would not trade Gunnar for him, for example. But lots of these guys I’ve compared him to as 2Bs (Cano, Utley, Altuve, Pedroia, Kinsler) were not super tooled-up guys, and they’re all among the 25-50 most valuable players of the last 25 years or so. I don’t know that you have to be a Greek god to be a perennial All-Star type player, at least at that particular position.  
    • Why do you want to elevate the opposing pitcher's pitch count?
    • I really hope that doesn't happen. Hyde said that the 6-man rotation was not going to be a permanent thing, nor should it with our schedule and our bullpen situation. The pen needs a long man. Suarez is a maybe to complete five innings. Suarez should be in the pen, not starting at Yankee Stadium.
    • If a team is not getting walks, they aren't elevating the opponent pitcher's pitch count. They are also having quicker innings and taxing their own pitchers.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...