Jump to content

Return of Buck


Birds08

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Because of the logical fallacy that you can't deflect blame unless there's someone to actually deflect the blame to.  As it stands right now, it was still Buck's decision to not put Britton in and Ubaldo instead.  Not bench coach John Russell, not Rick Adair, not Dom Chiti, not anyone else.

The decision to not put in Britton still rests squarely on Buck's shoulders.

You don't agree with that, and that's fine.  So, agree to disagree.  

Huh?  That’s exactly what I agree with.

His comments lead you to believe that he feels he’s not the only one to blame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Huh?  That’s exactly what I agree with.

His comments lead you to believe that he feels he’s not the only one to blame.

...right.  And yet, all we know is to still blame Buck.  And keep blaming him because he's not telling the whole story.  

His comments would lead you to believe that he's not telling the whole story.  And so...that's it, it's over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

...right.  And yet, all we know is to still blame Buck.  And keep blaming him because he's not telling the whole story.  

His comments would lead you to believe that he's not telling the whole story.  And so...that's it, it's over.

Seems like Buck is the one who thinks Buck isn’t the only one to blame.  Even if that’s true, he shouldn’t say it, especially as he reminds everyone that the managers job is to wear it. 
 

It’s passive aggressive.  It’s not needed. He was wrong, leave it at that and move on. No reason to bring ambiguity into it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

I don't have a huge issue with what he said though it continues to show that Buck refuses to take responsibility for that terrible managerial call. I just can't figure out who he could possibly be protecting? 

By the way, good leaders that "wear it" for someone else typically don't go around telling people that they are "wearing it".

 

I love Buck, but I have to agree. As someone else just mentioned, it's a bit passive aggressive and was unnecessary.

Then again, he's probably been asked about it 500 times....so I'll write it off as a slip. Nobody's perfect. 

Regardless, I still love me some Buck Showalter and sincerely miss his post game interviews.

 

 

Edited by CP0861
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a big fan, overrated IMO. I believe (could be way off here) that he was influential in the Davis extension (maybe not the amount, but the desire to have him). I never found him terribly creative in his game approach. Dedicated to his vets..Davis, Jones, Manny (who wouldn't be). And sometimes overfocused on the minutia of the game like, time to the plate, which I believe (again maybe wrong) caused problems with Arrieta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't measure my opinion of Buck off one decision even if it drove me crazy at then time. It's over. My opinion was really high at the beginning then ebbed as time went on. He was a savior at first and then glad he wasn't rehired at the end. That's probably been Buck's Mo with multiple teams. His sheck wears out. I still like him as a baseball person. He is a good listen. He made us relevant again for a while. I hope he gets a great ovation and welcome back. That will be the classy thing to do. And, we are Class, unlike some fan bases I know. And, I also hope we sweep him out of town!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at the Orioles' record over the past quarter century (1998-2022).  In those 25 years, we were .500 or better 6 times.  5 of those 6 years were in Buck's 8 years here.  The other 17 teams (pre and post-Buck) were a combined 380 games below .500.  We've had 3 playoff teams in those 25 years.  Buck was at the helm for all of them.

If we want to ignore all of that and just look at the 2016 playoff game, I guess we can.  It's certainly fair to judge the state of the team when he left, though it's probably fair to look at the fact that he took over a team that hadn't broken the 70 win mark the five years before he got here.  It's not like he took over a stable program.

He was a huge boost to this franchise and helmed the best run we've had since the Bill Clinton administration.  I'll always be thankful for him and this it's disappointing how he's often remembered.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gofannon said:

Look at the Orioles' record over the past quarter century (1998-2022).  In those 25 years, we were .500 or better 6 times.  5 of those 6 years were in Buck's 8 years here.  The other 17 teams (pre and post-Buck) were a combined 380 games below .500.  We've had 3 playoff teams in those 25 years.  Buck was at the helm for all of them.

If we want to ignore all of that and just look at the 2016 playoff game, I guess we can.  It's certainly fair to judge the state of the team when he left, though it's probably fair to look at the fact that he took over a team that hadn't broken the 70 win mark the five years before he got here.  It's not like he took over a stable program.

He was a huge boost to this franchise and helmed the best run we've had since the Bill Clinton administration.  I'll always be thankful for him and this it's disappointing how he's often remembered.

669- 684
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Buck was a manager and the culture change he brought was great. He will get a huge ovation tonight and this weekend and he deserves it.

That said, he benefits from how bad the Os were before him and that added to his Orioles lore and DD doesn’t get enough credit for moves he made.(and he deserves blame for others as well)

Ultimately, it’s mixed for me. 2012-2016 was great but Buck had too much power, had PA’s ear too much (none of which is Bucks fault) and he was a big reason the organization was in shambles for so long after he left.

The DD/Toronto stuff really changed things imo.

Agree there was good and bad with Buck. Angelos liked him which was huge a deal compared to how things were run before Buck. But in the end he was a manager, and they are always in win-now mode, to the detriment of the team sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Gurgi said:

Buck seems like an okay guy but is very guarded with "baseball speak"  when he is on camera.

I would love to get a 12 pack into him and hear what he really thinks about stuff.  It would probably be amazing. 

That's the way I feel about Brandon Hyde. I like him as a Manager, but his nervous stuttering press conferences have me twitching. He's just too afraid to say the wrong thing and he's afraid of offending someone. I'd love to get some beers in Hyder and see him loosened up and know what he really thinks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CP0861 said:

 

Regardless, I still love me some Buck Showalter and sincerely miss his post game interviews.

 

 

Buck was one of the best post game interviews this team has ever had. When Fredi Gonzalez got to manage 1 game during Hyde's daughter's college graduation, Fredi's post game interview kind of reminded me of Buck's. He was very fluid and comfortable with the media. He communicated his thoughts well and didn't worry so much about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I too was *this* pissed off yesterday. I'm sympathetic. But the reality of the situation is that Kansas City played out of their minds defensively and baseball happened.  Now, this was a microcosm of the second half of the season and that's just a fact. They dealt with injuries, just like every team does... they just didn't deal with them very effectively. I'm not sure if casting blame upon the hitting coaches or Hyde really holds any water for me. But I understand the desire for a scapegoat. It was REALLY hard to watch batter after batter trying to hit a 13 run home run on pitches that weren't really all that close to the strike zone. They were way out of their lanes and it was patently obvious that panic was setting in. I felt like it was a basketball game and Hyde needed to call a timeout or something. Like they needed to be snapped out of it or something, maybe by something drastic like, oh, putting Jackson Holliday in there for an at bat in an important spot.  They hit a lot of balls at guys, they swung at bunch of BS repeatedly. I saw it from Mountcastle, Santander, Henderson, Cowser (embarrassingly so), McCann during game 1, Rutschman too.  The only thing I could maybe blame Hyde for is not successfully alleviating the panic. Baseball's different though... I'm just a slapdick fan, I have no idea what the realities of his job are. But that lineup needed to find a way to relax and the further the game went the more they freaked out. It was the opposite of a loose dugout. It was fear, panic and foreboding doom. Is it even possible to snap that group out of it? I dunno. The veterans were the ones (other than Mullins) that were pressing the most. I think I would have found a way to get Holliday or Kjerstad some meaningful at bats. Yeah, maybe that's Monday morning quarterbacking. Maybe they would have reacted the same way the rest of them did.  They couldn't have been worse...  
    • Ok I’m changing this a little. Don’t know O’Hearn is worth the 8 mil.. Maybe we can replace. I’m actually pretty juiced at the potential of this and all of these guys are overdue for regular ABs together.    CF Mullins 3B Westburg C Adley SS Gunnar LF Cowser DH O’hearn/Mayo 1B Mountcastle  RF Kjerstad 2B Holliday Util: Mayo (regular DH platoon, spot starts in the field, Mateo (speed/defense)  
    • Honestly, they need to fix the right field wall too.  It is too ridiculous and screws with the right-handed hitters.  Move it in 10 feet and lower it a bit.
    • I said it before, and I'll say it again. This Royals team is entirely a function of their starting pitching (Ragans, Lugo, Wacha, Singer) and their recent BP arm pickups/conversions (Erceg, Bubic, Lynch, etc.). Their offense is basically Witt, Pasq, and Perez. I was pretty confident that the O's could shut them down going into this series, and they did. They only scored 3 runs. And none of their run scoring hits were all that amazing...if at all. The issue, of course, was the offense. Was that because of the pitching? Personally I thought Ragans looked hittable. He pitched better than Lugo, but the O's came up tiny in RISP situations. Same as yesterday. Ragans and Lugo mostly pitched out of the zone, and the O's just were aggressive. So, in this regard, give the credit to the Royals scouts and analytics teams. They knew exactly how to pitch to Santander: up, up, up. They knew exactly how to pitch to Cowser: low changeups. They knew exactly how to pitch to everybody not named Cedric Mullins. This Royals club is half decent, and if this O's club was the 2023 team, they shellack them. Alas, here we are. Think the Yankees are going to railroad these guys if they aren't rusty. 
    • He was developed according to the Orioles'  development plan.
    • Ryan Mountcastle avoiding getting hit in his dick with a pitch while trying to hold up his swing was infuriating.  
    • For the most part, no. The biggest thing a manager does is the culture they set and what they do off the field.  By all accounts, the players like Hyde, the culture is good and the team is happy with him. Now, if there is something there that we don’t know about, by all means make the change. However,  if every report is true, I see no reason to make a change. That’s making a change just to make a change. I would rather focus on the on field than assume some ceremonial change at manager is going to matter. Its been studied and we have talked about it a lot but in game strategy is so similar that its really only a game or two in terms of “manager WAR”.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...