Jump to content

A philosophical question re offense and defense


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Suppose you have three players in an organization who play the same position.  Player A is +10 runs on offense but -10 runs on defense.  Player B is -10 runs on offense but +10 runs on defense.  Player C is average on both offense and defense.   Which player would you choose to be on your team? And is your answer different depending on which position we’re talking about?

Apart from your preference, do you think the Orioles have a preference?

For purposes of my questions, no copping out by saying it depends who else is on the team.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A key variable is how (in)expensive each theoretical player and future years of control.

i think the Os prefer to have mixture of player types, and hope that strategic deployment can have either A, B, or C in exceed their production norms. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

I'm going with two mids, a fat and a skinny.

Anyone gets that reference, I'll buy you a beer if I ever see you at Camden Yards.

It's a video game reference. But can't even picture the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Suppose you have three players in an organization who play the same position.  Player A is +10 runs on offense but -10 runs on defense.  Player B is -10 runs on offense but +10 runs on defense.  Player C is average on both offense and defense.   Which player would you choose to be on your team? And is your answer different depending on which position we’re talking about?

Apart from your preference, do you think the Orioles have a preference?

For purposes of my questions, no copping out by saying it depends who else is on the team.  

1) The answer to which player I would prefer would be heavily dependent on the rest of my roster.

2) Setting it so it is run neutral kind of takes the O's preference out of it.  So long as it is run neutral the O's aren't likely to have a preference.  Saying that, I do believe they value defense highly.

3) And obviously, the Orioles, like many others, value up the middle defense more than corner defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Daddy-O's said:

I would take the hitter, you can hide the poor defense but you can't hide the hitter.  

And that's why you have pitchers.  Especially if you're targeting K%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does he have to play that one position every day?

I'm taking the guy who is +10 on offense, in hopes of finding a position that he won't kill me at whether that's 1B, DH, corner OF, or a combination of the three. 

There are also always late inning defensive replacements. 

My second pick would be the guy who is average in offense and defense and last pick would be Jorge Mateo. 

 

Edited by ChuckS
  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Suppose you have three players in an organization who play the same position.  Player A is +10 runs on offense but -10 runs on defense.  Player B is -10 runs on offense but +10 runs on defense.  Player C is average on both offense and defense.   Which player would you choose to be on your team? And is your answer different depending on which position we’re talking about?

Apart from your preference, do you think the Orioles have a preference?

For purposes of my questions, no copping out by saying it depends who else is on the team.  

Player A, stick him at DH.

That's easy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...