Jump to content

Poll - Would you trade McDermott for Scherzer straight up?


sportsfan8703

Poll - Would you trade McDermott for Scherzer straight up?  

115 members have voted

  1. 1. Poll - Would you trade McDermott for Scherzer straight up?



Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Philip said:

This doesn’t quite smack of ERod-Miller, or Davies-Parra; I cannot remember a trade of a high upside prospect for three months of a 39-year-old’s season.

I understand the arguments in favor, and McDermott has at least one serious problem, but I voted no, and I think I still vote no.

Erod- Miller helped me see my first playoff game live in my lifetime so I was good with that one!   But understand the concerns.    Wonder if Trace Bright would do it instead?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, oriole said:

It’s probably a bit of an overpay but it’s not like McDermott would likely be a playoff difference maker in any of his potential seasons in Baltimore but Scherzer would be. I’d do the trade.

This is actually pretty good logic here. Will McDermott ever be anything more than just a regular season SP at best with us like a Cole Irvin/Dean Kremer?  If he’s just an Irvin/Kremer type then try and win a WS this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Irvin has actually been one of the O's better starters not named Burnes.  He's mostly pitched into the 6th inning and several times the 7th inning.  I trust him more than Povich or Suarez or Kremer (whenever he gets back).

Irvin was very good the first 2 months. Because he made the adjustment from last season and he was pounding the strike zone early in counts as the scouting report was to take because of how he nibbled last year. 

But since the league had adjusted and started ambushing early, he has been really bad. He just doesn’t have the stuff/talent IMO to be an effective starting pitcher. His margin for error is so razor thin in order for him to be successful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Scherzer, but I think the team should focus on someone who is under control beyond the end of the season.  Unless ownership opens its wallet in the offseason, we'll be stuck trading for pitching again very soon.  Even if we do trade for someone controlled beyond the season it's almost definite we'll need more bullpen help or another starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Oh god, I can't stand John Smoltz. This alone is so beyond idiotic and completely unfounded, "We limit, we baby, we don't let them do the things they're naturally gifted to do." No, the problem is because they're not limited, because they're not babied, because they're pushed for maximum exertion on every pitch and everybody in the league is bigger/faster/stronger. That's the issue here. Everybody wants to throw the hardest. Everybody wants to go deeper in games. And let's be frank, here. John Smoltz pitched during the steroid era. There's no guarantee that he didn't use. But so many starters did. There's established testing now. But you have guys still throwing more and harder. Something has to give here. 
    • He doesn't help the team meaningfully this year because of his innings limit. And while he does give us 2 years of control after this year, this is really the only year he's been a starter aside from back in college which was half a decade ago. I say no. Too many risks and question marks around him. 
    • To justify trading for Kjerstad for Crochet I think you need to have Crochet ready to start games in the 2024 playoffs fully stretched out, and expect no limitations on workload in 2025 and 2026. With how much he’s already thrown in 2024, I think you’re already there for 2025/2026 workloads so long as he finishes this year healthy. I don’t think it’s worth it if he’s only going a RP in the playoffs this year. However, so long as he’s fresh and ready to roll as a SP in the playoffs this year, I don’t really care how much he pitches down the stretch in the regular season. Opener, bullpen, skip starts, pitch limits, option stint, IL stint, whatever don’t care - just as long as he’s taking the mound in our second playoff game after Burnes. Obviously I want to win the division over the Yankees, but one player (even one as good as Crochet) isn’t going to change that much more than a coin flip either way. It would take something catastrophic to miss the playoffs completely, and they already (still) have decent SP depth for the regular season to get into the playoffs. Adding a SP at the deadline is all about improving your odds once you’re in the dance.
    • I'll give you another reason why I think Basallo is and should be untouchable... Basallo is the first superstar in a new wave of Dominican players for the Orioles and needs to be a poster child for their investment and commitment to the DR players. Much in the same way many Venezuelan prospects want to ask about Santander, Basallo is going to be a massive star in the DR and along with the Orioles new complex is going to make young players down there want to sign with the Orioles. And as compelling as this reason is, it's probably still in the middle of my list after his position, defense, offensive potential, and level relative to age (not in that order).
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...