Jump to content

2019 1st round pick (1): Adley Rutschman - Catcher - Oregon State University


Recommended Posts

I am not terribly optimistic that he will sign. When they showed the "family" shot upon his selection at #1, it was pretty low key. The girl to his left (girlfriend???) showed no emotion at all. The number 1 choice always gets drafted by a poor team, most sign. I don't think it's a money thing. If he doesn't sign, I would expect him to make less the next time around. Does he want to finish OSU (can he after he has an agent???)?? If he doesn't sign would the O's pick him 1 next year?? Hard for me to believe anyone would turn down about 8 mil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, UpstateNYfan said:

I am not terribly optimistic that he will sign. When they showed the "family" shot upon his selection at #1, it was pretty low key. The girl to his left (girlfriend???) showed no emotion at all. The number 1 choice always gets drafted by a poor team, most sign. I don't think it's a money thing. If he doesn't sign, I would expect him to make less the next time around. Does he want to finish OSU (can he after he has an agent???)?? If he doesn't sign would the O's pick him 1 next year?? Hard for me to believe anyone would turn down about 8 mil.

He will sign and he will be signed while the team is home. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, UpstateNYfan said:

I am not terribly optimistic that he will sign. When they showed the "family" shot upon his selection at #1, it was pretty low key. The girl to his left (girlfriend???) showed no emotion at all. The number 1 choice always gets drafted by a poor team, most sign. I don't think it's a money thing. If he doesn't sign, I would expect him to make less the next time around. Does he want to finish OSU (can he after he has an agent???)?? If he doesn't sign would the O's pick him 1 next year?? Hard for me to believe anyone would turn down about 8 mil.

First, I believe there's about .01% chance he doesn't sign. 

Second, why would they waste another pick on him again if they couldn't come to an agreement this year? Unless you're pushing the zero leverage objective bc he's a senior sign. Either way don't see it happening. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, weams said:

He will sign and he will be signed while the team is home. 

 

8 minutes ago, UpstateNYfan said:

 If he doesn't sign would the O's pick him 1 next year?? Hard for me to believe anyone would turn down about 8 mil.

Probably at pick two. Give him less money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weams said:

He will sign and he will be signed while the team is home. 

I don't disagree seeing as it probably doesn't happen over the weekend and then they're home next week before 7/1.

But I don't understand why wait until the team is home...if that's what they are waiting for, that seems silly.  Get him signed and then do the dog and pony show in Baltimore when the team comes back home.  Bring him and Gunnar out to tip their caps to the 15k faithful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UpstateNYfan said:

I am not terribly optimistic that he will sign. When they showed the "family" shot upon his selection at #1, it was pretty low key. The girl to his left (girlfriend???) showed no emotion at all. The number 1 choice always gets drafted by a poor team, most sign. I don't think it's a money thing. If he doesn't sign, I would expect him to make less the next time around. Does he want to finish OSU (can he after he has an agent???)?? If he doesn't sign would the O's pick him 1 next year?? Hard for me to believe anyone would turn down about 8 mil.

He will sign.   The only issue to me is whether he’ll sign at a price that leaves us room to sign Henderson.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

He will sign.   The only issue to me is whether he’ll sign at a price that leaves us room to sign Henderson.   

I posted elsewhere, they have more than enough room  to sign Gunnar now. The 500 k and 700  k of 5% overage along with the 1.7m slot they can give him 3 million if he wants.  Maybe he thinks he'll get 8 million some day. He won't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Master Guns said:

First, I believe there's about .01% chance he doesn't sign. 

Second, why would they waste another pick on him again if they couldn't come to an agreement this year? Unless you're pushing the zero leverage objective bc he's a senior sign. Either way don't see it happening. 

The only way he doesn’t sign is if he badly fails the O’s physical. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, weams said:

I posted elsewhere, they have more than enough room  to sign Gunnar now. The 500 k and 700  k of 5% overage along with the 1.7m slot they can give him 3 million if he wants.  Maybe he thinks he'll get 8 million some day. He won't. 

If Gunnar is holding everything up, make him one last offer and move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Satyr3206 said:

If Gunnar is holding everything up, make him one last offer and move on.

This is such a no lose thing for the Orioles. Don't let your frustration cloud your vision on how this whole opportunity is of great value.  Worst case. Huge draft next year and you can take someone much farther along the development curve. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, UpstateNYfan said:

I am not terribly optimistic that he will sign. When they showed the "family" shot upon his selection at #1, it was pretty low key. The girl to his left (girlfriend???) showed no emotion at all. The number 1 choice always gets drafted by a poor team, most sign. I don't think it's a money thing. If he doesn't sign, I would expect him to make less the next time around. Does he want to finish OSU (can he after he has an agent???)?? If he doesn't sign would the O's pick him 1 next year?? Hard for me to believe anyone would turn down about 8 mil.

I think the player has the ability to block the team he didn't sign with from selecting him in the following draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • 1) I don't think it's a bad idea to consider moving on from non-productive vets like Hays and possibly Mullins as well. 2) I'm almost starting to move toward the opinion of re-signing Santander. He is likely not to require a major financial commitment (3/4 years at modest money). And I believe because most of his contributions come from counting stats (homers and RBIs) he is likely to be undervalued in this era of statcast baseball. 3) Elias has never (IMO for good reason) decided to take the approach of multiple/several first timers learning on the job at all at once. The potential for that to go sideways represents too much risk, when you are trying to win a World Series. 4) You didn't just mention moving on from Mullins and Hays. But you also mentioned Santander, O'Hearn, and Mountcastle. That is FIVE regulars and replacing them all with players who have never proven that they can hit Major League pitching. I would almost bet that there aren't 5 first timers in all of MLB who are succeeding this season on their first try. Now obviously, for Holliday next season will be his second try. And I guess 3rd for Stowers, maybe 4th depending how you look at it. And second/third for Kjerstad, Norby (I guess second). Though some of these guys stints were so short, I don't know if they could even get/make much of it some of those previous times. 5) If we make it to the postseason (which we are almost assured to do) win or lose this year in the Fall, it will be a very poor message to send to the fanbase to not spend/add in the offseason. With a payroll this low (ranked what 25th?) you should not be cutting cost and especially with a multi-billionaire owner. 6) If you don't trade any of these players this season, how do you propose that we get better/get the piece(s) that we need? 7) Even with all of these new young players and even if all of them performed right away, where is the pitching going to come from next season in order to legitimately contend (if you don't spend in the offseason)?
    • Nobody thought Toronto would not cash in on their "window". It slammed shut on them and they had a lot of young talent that regressed pretty hard. Cautionary tales are out there.
    • What an odd question. Of course it’s important. The entire baseball world will be paying attention to this series. The two best teams in all baseball, in the same division, each going for a crown at the expense of the other, and neither a big fan of the other. Wins are important regardless of the opponent, but it also goes without saying that we would rather win three out of four against the Yankees, than three out of four against the Athletics, or even other contenders like the Mariners or Guards.  
    • Yeah, too much young talent for that to happen next year, unless some major regression and injuries happen.
    • Mike Elias' job certainly entails doing due diligence on Jack Flaherty again.  
    • even if they do, so what? 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...