Jump to content

Grayson Rodriguez 2022


justD

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, btdart20 said:

Grayson has been ready all year.  But the service time rules are part of the game players and owners agreed to.  Neither side was on the side of more competition.

I’ll disagree with this. In the little we saw in spring training he struggled, and he struggled in a few of his triple-a starts as well. He’s been in a better groove lately

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way, if I had to guess, I’d say Grayson probably will have missed the Super 2 cutoff by the time his next start rolls around.   We won’t know until after the end of the 2024 season, but if I had to bet, that’s how I’d bet.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, seak05 said:

I’ll disagree with this. In the little we saw in spring training he struggled, and he struggled in a few of his triple-a starts as well. He’s been in a better groove lately

Pretty much every pitcher in pretty much every year has patches when they struggle.  That doesn't mean they aren't ready.

Didn't he pitch all of two innings in spring training?  Are we really judging him based off of two spring training innings?

If I missed an appearance or two I apologize.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Pretty much every pitcher in pretty much every year has patches when they struggle.  That doesn't mean they aren't ready.

Didn't he pitch all of two innings in spring training?  Are we really judging him based off of two spring training innings?

If I missed an appearance or two I apologize.

Whether you want to term it a bad patch or not ready, generally speaking that seems like a bad time to promote someone...and an especially bad time to promote someone to the major leagues 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, seak05 said:

Whether you want to term it a bad patch or not ready, generally speaking that seems like a bad time to promote someone...and an especially bad time to promote someone to the major leagues 

I don't think hot or cold streaks mean much unless there is an underlying reason for the behavior.

I certainly don't think Grayson giving up runs in one of the two innings he pitched in ML ST mean anything, anymore then if he had thrown two scoreless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't think hot or cold streaks mean much unless there is an underlying reason for the behavior.

I certainly don't think Grayson giving up runs in one of the two innings he pitched in ML ST mean anything, anymore then if he had thrown two scoreless.

I am of the belief that there is almost always an underlying reason for hot or cold streaks. With the one exception of literally everything you hit is smoked but right at somebody. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

Grayson is listed as Norfolks starter tonight.  Looks like at least another week unless there is some Tom foolery going on. 

Definitely bummed he’s not getting promoted. Seems like a waste of innings/his arm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Unless one of Cowser, Heston or Stowers wakes up one morning as a RHed batter or switch hitter, I don't think the veteran OFs are going anywhere. Urias and Mateo are a different story. One of them should go tp clear a roster spot. For me, Urias is an easy choice to be the one sent packing, whether with nothing in return or a lottery-ticket pitching prospect who throws hard (or two), but I understand that others disagree. And maybe they're both gone. One of the unknowables about this team is whether Jackson Holliday can be a useful part of it later this season.
    • The Orioles always seem to give a guy the day off after his first day back post-injury. They've done that with a lot of guys on the ML team, and I suspect they are just treating Holliday very carefully. 
    • Wow its finally here. I've been looking for this since January thanks for posting.
    • We REALLY need to get Suarez out of this rotation. It's been fun, but he's hitting a wall and really should be a reliever. Kremer soon, I guess. 
    • Yeah it would, then the question is . What is their definition of “ off the rails “ ?  Either way, we get the answer within 30 days 
    • You totally negate your argument to keep him when you say you don't think he would return anyone that would make it worthwhile. I think Mountcastle is a good clubhouse guy and has been a very solid player.  I was happy that the Orioles moved Mancini to Houston to make room for Mountcastle.  A similar move here could be beneficial.   The situations are not identical.  Mancini was a pending free agent and even though the Orioles were in the hunt of a playoff, they were not considered a contender.  So moving Mancini brought us back useful pieces AND allowed Mountcastle to step in. IF the Orioles move Mountcastle, they need to get SP or RP to help now, right?  It would be pretty ballsy to trade him for minor league pitching depth only.  I think Kjerstad or Mayo could outhit him the rest of the way, but I just don't think you move him unless it is for pitching that can help now. And to your point, I think Mountcastle could return pitching help.  Absolutely.  
    • There are times I forget that Ryan Mountcastle is only 27-years-old and we have 2.5 years of control remaining.  It seems like he should be close to 29-30.   
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...