Jump to content

Orioles acquire Ryan O’Hearn


Brian88

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, LTO's said:

Astros just traded for Bligh Madriss and added him to their 40 man. Doesn't mean he's making the team and this doesn't mean O'hearn is either.

True, but Roch did mention O'Hearn as a solution to the Orioles need for a lefty first baseman, as if this move accomplished that. Fair to think the Warehouse tells him to try and peddle these moves to try to sell them to Orioles fans. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Are you Ryan O'Hearn?

Because you have to admit that it makes sense if you are.

Except that I also got the message about O’Hearn.  And not only am I not him, I’m not even a close relative.   In fact, I don’t think I could have told you that there was a guy named Ryan O’Hearn who’d played in MLB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, waroriole said:

You’d think at some point Roch would be embarrassed of his reporting but he seems to have no dignity. 

Roch isn’t an independent journalist, the man has bills like the rest of us. People have got to give him a break and get their hot takes elsewhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Spakman said:

Did they really need to send a Welcome to Birdland email to me  for this ridiculous transaction.

That and double the minimum suggest decent roster odds.

It would be a deft turn of phrase though if the cash considerations referred to were from KC to BAL to pay him down closer to the minimum.

But assuming any marginal expense above MLB minimum carries weight...is Franchy the roster victim?

Bench this morning: McCann, Urias, McKenna, Franchy

Bench this evening: McCann, Urias, McKenna, O'Hearn

Both these benches leave Vavra in AAA.     I still have Stowers starting DH over Urias, though Franchy-O'Hearn could challenge for this role along with backing up Mountcastle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get the outrage over the starting pitching. Not this. 
 

This is a 26th man move. The club has no real backup at 1B in the system. They add someone who can hit LH and will play in a limited role. If Mountcastle gets hurt they are in trouble either way. With the shift rules, better home park and reasonable metrics I don’t get the complaints. 
 

The only way they add a Josh Bell type would be to make a trade of an existing starting player. There is no way around that. It’s been evident Elias has not been ready to do that yet and if he does, it will more than likely be at a position of organizational strength such as middle infield. Those players dealt would be filled internally. 
 

Unless you are dealing off Mountcastle or an OF what kind of position player do people expect? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

That and double the minimum suggest decent roster odds.

It would be a deft turn of phrase though if the cash considerations referred to were from KC to BAL to pay him down closer to the minimum.

But assuming any marginal expense above MLB minimum carries weight...is Franchy the roster victim?

Bench this morning: McCann, Urias, McKenna, Franchy

Bench this evening: McCann, Urias, McKenna, O'Hearn

Both these benches leave Vavra in AAA.     I still have Stowers starting DH over Urias, though Franchy-O'Hearn could challenge for this role along with backing up Mountcastle.

How Urias will be handled will be the story. A big part of his game is his glove. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, oriole said:

Roch isn’t an independent journalist, the man has bills like the rest of us. People have got to give him a break and get their hot takes elsewhere. 

I wonder how they teach it at journalism schools these days how much independence from ownership is ethical to wear the badge honorably?      The current state of MASN is I guess an exaggerated case with BAL and WAS fighting over it - I don't see much from other team-owned adjacent media companies but imagine other products a little more robust.     They probably at least fly their people to camp.

Or other side of coin, how do the Orioles orientation to America programs position who Steve Melewski is for say Samuel Basallo?

A "reporter"?   I guess, but a chance for him to take reps "in a controlled environment".

Its entertainment content for a product I enjoy, but Woodward and Bernstein it is not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Yardball85 said:

Not that I wanted Hosmer, but he would have been preferable to O'Hearn. 

Ironically, he’s cheaper than O’Hearn, since the Red Sox/Padres are on the hook for his salary for a couple more years.  And, he’s significantly better than O’Hearn, even if he’s grossly overpaid by those teams.   I didn’t want him, but I’d rather have him than O’Hearn.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Hays, Mateo, Urias, and Holliday represent about 15% of our teams PA's (218 of 1514) and have 12 walks combined. Their combined OBP is like 23% or something like that. It wouldn't be a stretch to say only Holliday is really going to be a future fixture of the team and he will/should be a very good OBP player.
    • Both taken out of the game under somewhat odd circumstances. Hays pinch run for by Stowers,  after pinch hitting for Cedric and getting a double.     Santander was taken out for defense in the 9th and replaced by O'Hearn.   In the previous inning Santander had doubled and was out at the plate on a head first slide on McCann's squeeze attempt. Neither of these moves makes sense from a tactical point of view.    Stowers isn't faster than Hays nor would he be a better CF.   O'Hearn isn't better defensively than Santander.   So I have to assume Hays and Santander are both nicked up one way or the other, leading to their removal.   Bears watching as we head into the weekend.   If it's just minor, we have an off day tomorrow.  But I found it odd that with Mullins' slump, Hays didn't start the game today vs a lefty.
    • I have to admit, that was pretty hilarious.  But as fans, we’ve all been there.  I feel sorry for those two die-hards.
    • Perhaps not planning to start either one of them in this series and thinking that they prefer Hays to McKenna as a PH? This could explain the timing of Stowers over Kjerstad. Since Stowers is a better defensive option while they are hesitating to put Hays out there.
    • Both of them come across as being very arrogant know-it-all types. But I’m sorry give me Nestor over La Canfora any day! At least Nestor doesn’t consistently make stuff up and then try to pretend that it’s some kind of “insider” reporting.
    • Alright fair. I think if you're the FO you have to second guess this approach because it's not working for your hitters. Everyone is flailing at garbage and popping stuff up. I don't really understand the benefit of being over-aggressive. Let's take this series where it's plain to see that Toronto has good starting pitching and a bad bullpen. But due to your aggressiveness, you don't chase the SP, and therefore you're stuck facing Toronto's only two good relievers in Romano and Yimi - in both games due to the rainout.  So that's a bad approach mixed with bad advance scouting. They picked the most difficult way to try and beat this Jays team.
    • Come on, fellas.  It's just Dundalk Jay, man.  He's just trollin the airwaves a little... lol.  Tryin' to get some O's talk goin'.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...