Jump to content

Orioles Acquire LHP Cole Irvin from the A's for Darrel Hernaiz


LTO's

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Please speak of these “good” pitchers that were actually willing to sign here?  Taillon?  What would we have had of paid him over the Cubs?  Kluber?  Same ERA+, but also chose Boston. Eovaldi?  That’s a risky contract, lost draft pick, and he chose Texas. 
 

It looks like we were left without a dance partner, and Elias made the best of it. 

The not willing to sign here is an old excuse. If you pay them enough they'll sign. I agree on Taillon, but there were plenty of FA pitchers who signed for less than four years who would have made this team better.  That said, I'm not convinced the Orioles seriously pursued any of the notable FA pitchers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HakunaSakata said:

The not willing to sign here is an old excuse. If you pay them enough they'll sign. I agree on Taillon, but there were plenty of FA pitchers who signed for less than four years who would have made this team better.  That said, I'm not convinced the Orioles seriously pursued any of the notable FA pitchers. 

We did, nobody came here. We called Grienke, he’s KC or bust, so we made this move. I’d rather have Mullins and this trade, versus Pablo Lopez. Sure we could overpay for Wacha or Eovaldi, but why?

Like Elias said, this is a really easy roster for the manager to manage. Match up lineups. Match up SPs. Match up defense. We have a very versatile team. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

We did, nobody came here. We called Grienke, he’s KC or bust, so we made this move. I’d rather have Mullins and this trade, versus Pablo Lopez. Sure we could overpay for Wacha or Eovaldi, but why?

Like Elias said, this is a really easy roster for the manager to manage. Match up lineups. Match up SPs. Match up defense. We have a very versatile team. 

Did we offer to pay them enough?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Meh …call me unimpressed. A 4.00 ERA pitcher with a terrible K per 9. And a 5 era minor leaguer. Don’t know much about Hernaiz but we’ve added to our pile of mediocre players

His career minor league ERA was 3.05.  Never doubt Roll Tide’s ability to just make stuff up. 

  • Haha 5
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno... I kind of like it.  He would have had the second lowest WHIP among our starters last year by .03 points.  He would have led the team in innings pitched and he has a career WHIP of 1.2 over 400 innings.  And, he averaged 6 innings per start last year.  I like the idea of a guy who can eat innings, keep the game close, and doesn't cost a lot.  You can never have too much pitching.  We can always trade him if the youngsters come through.  

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

We did, nobody came here. We called Grienke, he’s KC or bust, so we made this move. I’d rather have Mullins and this trade, versus Pablo Lopez. Sure we could overpay for Wacha or Eovaldi, but why?

Like Elias said, this is a really easy roster for the manager to manage. Match up lineups. Match up SPs. Match up defense. We have a very versatile team. 

I don't mind this trade, but Eovaldi at 2 years $34M was not an overpay.  I am still annoyed that the Orioles did not sign him for that or a similar amount).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At some point we really have to wonder about a 6-man rotation.  Or if they'll piggyback some guys.  Crowded isn't the right word.  Maybe congested?  Phlegmy?  

Not sure who said it on the thread, but it could end up in the A's favor years from now.  But I like it in the moment for what it is.  It does add ML level depth.  It deals from MI depth.  It reallocated profits toward an org weakness getting Virbitsky.  

If things break right with Grayson/Kremer/Bradish, then Irvin's 4 years of team control "should" mean no Lyles/Gibson-types next year.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like this. Better than signing Wacha or Greinke because you have him for four years if he pitches well. Giving up Hernaiz doesn't impact the system much. 

We can complain that the upper tier FAs would have been better (they would have and we should have gotten one) but in isolation this is a strong move.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I have a question for you. More value… Hernaiz or a the draft picks we would’ve lost to sign a QO SP?

Off the top of my head I'd say Hernaiz is roughly equivalent in value to a late second round pick at this point.  I certainly wouldn't expect a late second round pick to end up being more than Hernaiz is.

I have a question for you.  More value....Irvin or a free agent pitcher that received a Qualifying Offer?

Edited by Can_of_corn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

I like this. Better than signing Wacha or Greinke because you have him for four years if he pitches well. Giving up Hernaiz doesn't impact the system much. 

We can complain that the upper tier FAs would have been better (they would have and we should have gotten one) but in isolation this is a strong move.

I don't think picking up a below average pitcher is something that can be called a strong move.

It's a move. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Why does everybody want to jump and label a kid so fast? What is this, his 2nd major-league season? Yes, certainly they shouldn't go into next year thinking he's a lock for 30+ starts and 180-200 innings but we can't say he's already reached his peak either. 
    • And their defense is very good. To put things in perspective, the Tigers collective dWAR is +0.5. The Orioles is -2.8. Minnesota -4.1, Yankees -0.3, Houston -0.1, Seattle +2.0, Royals at +2.5. The Royals really standout as most of that value is driven by Fermin (catcher) and Witt.  But I think my point is that the Tigers have excellent pitching (starting pitching and bullpen) as well as excellent defense. And they're not putrid with the bats.  I would say the one saving grace about the Tigers is they don't run much. 
    • We could have easily swept Detroit in Baltimore, the lineup we have now is not the lineup they faced. It doesn't matter who the opponent is, just win.
    • Both of them are important to consider here. They could have a mediocre offense every single game of the season, but if the pitching is elite (and it is!), it'll carry them.  We have 6 games against the Tigers this year. And yes, most of them were without the cadre of regulars. But here are the offensive numbers against them: .211/.282/.392 - .674 OPS They scored 20 runs in 6 games against them. Barely scraping 3 R/G. And a good portion of them coming in *1* game.  Out of the WC potentials the O's could face, here are their R/G: Royals: 29 in 6 games = 4.8 R/G Twins: 22 in 3 = 7.3 R/G Mariners: 27 in 6 = 4.5 R/G Tigers: 20 in 6 = 3.3 R/G Out of all the playoff teams, the best RA/G are the Mariners (3.75), Guardians (3.85), and Tigers (4.96). For the playoffs, you want to look at who you're facing on the bump. Which team scares you the most? Because if you can't hit against the team, it doesn't matter what the opposing offense is.  Also you'll want to consider the best fielding teams, too.   Seems to me you'd want to face the team you matchup best against *and* who has the worst defense and worst pitching, because presumably your 3 starters (Burnes, Eflin, Kremer) should be able to hold teams in check. 
    • I'd prefer Detroit - they've been so hot for so long they should be due to cool off. KC has been just the opposite. 
    • I'd say the Royals...pitch around Witt and Salvy Perez who seems to have had our number in recent years.  The rest of their lineup isn't too imposing. Wacha  -a guy I wanted this offseason and was laughed at for wanting him- has a 2.64 ERA over his last 15 starts.  He's the soft-tossing type that gives our lineup fits and, IIRC, he was great against us earlier this year.  Lugo has had a great year, so has Ragans.  Their starters are good. But they're 3-7 over their last 10 while the Tigers are 8-2.  A lot of the postseason, IMO, is catching teams at the right/wrong time.  This could all change by next week but the Tigers are hot, the Royals are not... Then again, I said I wanted to face Texas in the first round last year and look what happened.  So who knows.  
    • Would much rather face KC and to me it’s not close.    game 1 agains Skubal is an L. They’ve proven they can beat us with a bullpen game, a bullpen only behind CLE as best in the AL.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...