Jump to content

Kangaroo court


Big Al

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, oriolediehard said:

If Mateo didn't waste those 2 seconds, he would have tried to come home and be thrown out at the plate and just a long out and no run.  I am glad he didn't have the opportunity to try to come home.

He didn't waste two seconds.  He didn't optimize them by like 10 percent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aristotelian said:

He even coasted in at the end. Probably could have made it in 10.5 even with the late jump at first base.

Wow, that would have been the fastest time in the Statcast era.

Elly's 10.83 (fastest of the season, second fastest since 2020)

https://bdata-producedclips.mlb.com/6807eae6-df47-4f38-85f4-e5ce2dbabcf6.mp4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Big Al said:

As I watched Mateo jog to first with bat still in hand on what could have been an inside the park home run, I thought back to the days of the Kangaroo court.  Frank Robinson was the perfect person to perform the duties of the judge (established veteran superstar with a hard nosed, no nonsense mentality).  If we were to reinstate "the court" who would be the best candidate to hold the gavel and administer punishment?  

Adley 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Wow, that would have been the fastest time in the Statcast era.

Elly's 10.83 (fastest of the season, second fastest since 2020)

https://bdata-producedclips.mlb.com/6807eae6-df47-4f38-85f4-e5ce2dbabcf6.mp4

Have you looked at the link pickles shared as well as the stills? I don't know what to say, he is definitely there in 11 seconds and he is coasting at the end. If he is anywhere near Elly's time that tells me he couldn't have hesitated for too long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Oh, you're lazy.  Cool.

Here ya go, darling.

 

Contact.png

MissedCatch.png

The MLBTV condensed game is a highly edited presentation.  Understand that it takes about a minute to edit down a 20 second 5-6 shot sequence to a credible 12 second 5-6 shot sequence which the audience fully accepts because they're watching in a montage format.  Furthermore, it takes about 10 seconds to add a speed ramp that moves a shot or sequence from 100% to say 115% which looks more exciting.  There is no reason to believe that any part of the condensed game is an accurate representation of real time.  You should go back to the replay of the full game if you want to try to use a rough stopwatch.

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 24fps said:

The MLBTV condensed game is a highly edited presentation.  Understand that it takes about a minute to edit down a 20 second 5-6 shot sequence to a credible 12 second 5-6 shot sequence which the audience fully accepts because they're watching in a montage format.  Furthermore, it takes about 10 seconds to add a speed ramp that moves a shot or sequence from 100% to say 115% which looks more exciting.  There is no reason to believe that any part of the condensed game is an accurate representation of real time.  You should go back to the replay of the full game if you want to try to use a rough stopwatch.

I respect your technical knowledge.  You're giving me a lot of work to do now.

I don't care.  This dude can fly.

Edit: Just hand timed it.  Got under 11.  From the full game.

Edited by Pickles
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, hutchead said:

I have the original game on DVR. I just timed it with my stopwatch twice and I got 11.2 seconds both times. Of course that's not an exact science but just throwing that out there.

I just watched the full game version and got 11.3 using the stopwatch on my phone. The sequence looks exactly the same as the condensed game. There is an additional replay that does show him still with bat in hand briefly slowing up so I see what people are talking about, but it's pretty subtle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jorge is frustrated at this point, of course. He is human. Most players have moments where they don’t “bust it” out of the box, especially in the months of July and August. He does some things that drive us to be critical of his play, but he is no Felix Pie level of boneheadedness. Not even close.

So what if he didn’t quite run full out to start. Hyde may have someone address it with him, quietly and professionally. Mateo admitted it in his interview, and he knows better. I do not think he generally lacks hustle, quite the opposite, in fact. 

There is time for holding someone accountable and attention to detail, but you have to remember the human factor as a teammate or a manager. Fans, well they can be brutal at all times. That is the nature of being a fan. That is why they are fans and not players, managers or team execs. 

Mullins and Hays have tenure to be the Judge, but McCann, Frazier and Gibson could be more of a panel or triumvirate of justices in the Kangaroo Court. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh my God. A thread dedicated to a fun topic delves into Pickles and CoC’s never ending attempts at semantics one upmanship, pettiness and school marm-ery. Adding CoC’s constant slurping of Elly De La Cruz and it’s like their Greatest Hits album. 
 

Anyway, I think Santander would have a blast leading the Kangaroo Court. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Pickles said:

If Jorge Mateo cured cancer there'd be a thread on here the next day blaming him for AIDS.

He hit a line drive right to the CF that should have been caught 90% of the time, since it was a line drive it got past the CF in  literally 2 seconds, Mateo was not going at full speed for literally 2 seconds.  He was going  at a crisp pace down the line though, certainly not standing in the box.  Some people seem offended he didn't immediately discard his bat.  Whatever.  Again, it's 2 seconds.  The ball came into SS just as he was rounding into third- even going 100% from contact would not have made enough of a difference to turn this into an inside the park home run.

His legs literally scored that first run.  A fairly important run if I recall.

Yes, I suspect that the Mets 3rd baseman Vientos' knowing how fast Mateo is led him to rush, bobble the grounder, and settle for throwing Rutschman out at first.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mateo is such a lightening rod.  Other than looking sloppy, holding onto the bat up the line had no impact on him not scoring an in the parker.  Anything short of him being perfect is going to garner some negative response.  What's meaningful to me is how quick he was off to score on contact with AR's fielder's choice.  I don't think they get him at the plate anyway - even cleanly played.  The catcher was in front of the plate and Mateo was already 2/3 of the way down the line by the time the 3rd baseman would have been squared to throw. 

Judge McCann

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I think Mountcastle is the foremost person hurt by Walltimore. I honestly think we need to reconsider what type of right handed batters we throw out there. More Luis Arraez or someone with high OBP. I could see Mountcastle having a revival somewhere else. But not sure it’s really working here anymore, even though he was solid last year. 
    • Who is the real MOO bat though?  I can't think of one other than Soto available.  I am all in on Soto, but I don't think the Orioles will even sniff him.  Absent Soto, who do you look to acquire? I agree that it is time to move on from Tony and Mounty, but I do think you are a little harsh on Tony.  He has won a number of games for this team in the clutch.  He is just prone to cold spells.  
    • OK, there won't be 30 making actual bids but Burnes is free to sign with any team at the highest price. There is one very big reason he won't sign with us, which is money. We do have payroll flexibility but that evaporates if we put $40m/year in one player. I would love this if it happens but my expectations are very low. Even if we are "one of the favorites", say the final four, we only have a 25% chance. Probably lower if any of the others are in larger markets. So I have to agree with Roch's assessment. 
    • In that case the question could be do we pay Mountcastle 6-7M or do we pay a AAAA guy league minimum and use his money on RP. The purpose of keeping Mountcastle was the hope he would eventually break out and have a career year. He’s regressing offensively and the odds of that breakout are shrinking. 
    • With his season now over, curious what happened to the version of Cowser we drafted. looking at his scouting report coming out of Sam Houston State, the concern with him was would his power translate to MLB while his plate discipline and ability to draw walks being a plus. Certainly were concerns about the strikeouts but nowhere near the concerns of someone like Honeycutt.    He finishes the year with 52 walks and 172 strikeouts, with a 30% K rate. He was near the top of the league in strikeouts for most of the year.  is this purely his issues with off speed pitches? Can this be improved or do we accept the awful strikeouts and laud the plus defense.
    • I want to also address the Harper point. I'm talking about RISP, not "late and close". We can talk about high leverage/late and close in a diff convo, but strictly RISP: Bryce Harper 2023: 272/.803 2024: 331/ 1.122 2023 was a goofy year for Harper coming off of Tommy John. He looked good in April, but was a disaster in May/June before finishing the season on fire that year. I don't think he's a good case study for your example. Besides, I'm not talking singular player performance. I'm talking as a team which is far less susceptible to SSS and "chance". FWIW, I do think luck somewhat plays into this.  But let's look at this as a team. 1,298 AB with RISP for the O's this year. A 251 BA. Last year they hit 287. That's a 36 point difference. Yeah, only 3.6%. But let's look at what 3.6% means with that many AB. That means: 47 extra hits. I don't believe that 47 hits explains "luck" or "chance". Maybe for certain hitters in certain situations. There is an element of BABIP here. In 2024, it was 317. This year? 289. So, if we truly believe 300 is league average, they were a little unlucky this year, and somewhat lucky last year. But we are still talking about a dramatic dropoff. Now, is that because of playing more rookies this year? Because of the injuries? Very possibly. And in a 2 game series that can rear its ugly head. But there was nothing unlucky about yesterday or the day before. They just came up completely empty. Maybe the only unlucky situations were Ramon and Westy rips being caught.
    • I mentioned this once before but if you follow high end D1 softball the game has changed dramatically because the pitching is so dominate.  The theory is, you aren't going to score a bunch of runs by stringing singles together so most top programs only recruit athletes with game changing power or speed.  The speed aspect is important because you can turn a single into a double by stealing so now it only takes 2 hits to score a run instead of 3.   The O's lower minors seem to be stacked with guys that can steal bases so maybe that will be the change in philosophy moving forward.   It is just a thought but maybe the organization see's the pitching trend that is dominating because of the bullpen usage and OBP and runs scored across the board are down.  So stack your team with power and or speed and not much else matters.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...