Jump to content

Colton Cowser 2024


Recommended Posts

I know it’s already been said but Cowser continues to make plays that most LF, including Austin Hays, can’t.    He continues to make plays that either save runs or potentially save runs.  They always say you can’t give a team extra outs.  Cowser is taking hits away.  Works for me.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I know it’s already been said but Cowser continues to make plays that most LF, including Austin Hays, can’t.    He continues to make plays that either save runs or potentially save runs.  They always say you can’t give a team extra outs.  Cowser is taking hits away.  Works for me.

The question that I am still trying to answer is whether Cowser is a good defensive CFer.  How does he compare to Mulins defensively in CF?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I know it’s already been said but Cowser continues to make plays that most LF, including Austin Hays, can’t.    He continues to make plays that either save runs or potentially save runs.  They always say you can’t give a team extra outs.  Cowser is taking hits away.  Works for me.

Statcast ranked that catch last night on Arozarena as a 5% probability catch.   His range is terrific.  He needs to clean up his throws, but he's got the arm strength.   

Hays deserved his Gold Glove nomination last year, but I'd certainly agree Cowser covers more ground.  You'd have to think he may get a Gold Glove nomination (or even the award) if he continues to be a starter all season.  The fact that he jumps around may hurt him, since they now give Gold Gloves for the specific outfield spots, not just three OF spots regardless of which position they play.

I like it late in games when they have Cowser, Mullins and Hays all out there.   

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, wildcard said:

The question that I am still trying to answer is whether Cowser is a good defensive CFer.  How does he compare to Mulins defensively in CF?

Too soon to tell.  Statically, Mullins was above average in 2022 and 2023.  In 2022 his DRS was 5 and OAA 9.  In 2023 it was 7 and 6.  This year in 452 innings it’s 0 and 2.  So his OAA is trending close to last year.  Cowser in 102 innings has 1 DRS and 1 OAA.   We probably need more data on Cowser but that SSS supports the idea that there is little to no drop off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, wildcard said:

The question that I am still trying to answer is whether Cowser is a good defensive CFer.  How does he compare to Mulins defensively in CF?

Cowser's CF numbers are a shade better than Mullins'.   He's a little faster and taller.  Some of those spectacular catches Mullins makes by leaping, lunging or diving, Cowser can make without needing to be quite that athletic.  

Mullins (452 innings in CF): +2 OAA, -2 Rtot, 0 Rdrs, +0.1 UZR

Cowser (102 innings in CF): +1 OAA, +3 Rtot, +1 Rdrs, +0.5 UZR

Numbers don't always tell the story,  but my eye test agrees that we aren't really losing anything when Cowser plays CF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Malike said:

Cowser has been fantastic in the field. Statcast rates his reaction negatively and his routes at 0 but his burst allows him to get to a lot of balls. 

That’s definitely what plays out when watching the games. Shaky jumps but covers tremendous amount of ground in LF, really in all directions.  I think his relatively poor jumps get exposed a bit more in CF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Next year If Cowser can be regular in center and Kjerstad replaces Santander in right that leaves Stower or Norby in left.    The O's will need a backup centerfield.   Maybe Daniel Johnson?  or Billy Cook?

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Say O! said:

That’s definitely what plays out when watching the games. Shaky jumps but covers tremendous amount of ground in LF, really in all directions.  I think his relatively poor jumps get exposed a bit more in CF.

These days you have to be careful how you use the term “jump.”  Statcast defines “jump” as the distance the fielder travels in the first 3 seconds after the ball is hit, and divides that into “reaction” (the first 1.5 seconds) and “burst” (the second 1.5 seconds).  So, per Statcast, Cowser has an average or slightly below average “reaction” but a well above average “burst,” which when combined give him a somewhat above average “jump.”   But I think you are using the term “jump” to mean what Statcast calls “reaction.”

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the biggest challenges for outfielders is acclimating to the bigger stadiums, the upper deck specifically. Not only do fly balls look different with that backdrop but they play different in every stadium due to weather conditions and orientation to the sun, moon, even the stars., etc. It seems like a stretch but it really isn’t. Tracking a ball 250 feet in the night sky in swirling wind conditions, battling the upper deck, with men on base, etc etc is no small task and he did not look awesome out there last year. Plus he really struggled offensively which seemed to carry over into the field. He was a mess in his time with the big club in 23. 

Some folks were ready to anoint him a failure. Some stuck by (and stand by) his abilities and talent). To me, he is skilled enough to play a good defensive CF. Offensive things being equal (or comparable) between he and Ced, Ced probably is still the guy you prefer to roam out there with CC being best suited for a corner spot but CC is also very good and continues to improve in center. I really see a lot of Charlie Blackmon in his game though I think CC is a better defender overall.

It’s tragic watching Ced struggle as much as he has but it’s been fantastic to see Cowser make the strides he has this year. He’s a bonafide major league outfielder with plus abilities across all five tools. Should Ced not find his way back, the O’s are in a great position to run CC out there in center for the next few years or until someone else comes along to supplant him. Personally, I would continue to pencil him into center to see how much more he has, which I feel is still a good bit. He’s been very good overall but how good in center (to some) seems to be a surprise. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Yossarian said:

Looking at the lineups today against Atlanta - Cowser's numbers are very similar to Matt Olson.  Cowser is a lot cheaper,  though.

It's really bizarre how Olson and Riley (and really every ATL hitter but Ozuna) fell off a cliff this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

These days you have to be careful how you use the term “jump.”  Statcast defines “jump” as the distance the fielder travels in the first 3 seconds after the ball is hit, and divides that into “reaction” (the first 1.5 seconds) and “burst” (the second 1.5 seconds).  So, per Statcast, Cowser has an average or slightly below average “reaction” but a well above average “burst,” which when combined give him a somewhat above average “jump.”   But I think you are using the term “jump” to mean what Statcast calls “reaction.”

Thx for unpacking this detail. You are indeed correct, I am thinking reaction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • No earthly way I trade 6 years of a top 20 prospect, catcher or first base, for 2.5 years of a guy who has made 17 major league starts.
    • I never said that and do not believe any of that as Rubenstein didn't even have control of the franchise at that time. And you better believe that if it was still in Angelos hands he would not allow Rubenstein much of any input until ALL of the risk/liability was transferred to Rubenstein. I love your use of the word "methodical" there to describe John Angelos. I have some of other words for it - cheap, miserish, greedy, moneygrubbing, tightwad, terrible, awful ... just to name a few...lol
    • I think the vast majority of people think that playoffs in any professional sport is a crap shoot. I also don't think you'll find anyone on this board that doesn't want to make any additions to this roster. I just take issue with an argument that says there is no way the Orioles could win the WS with their pitching staff. That's over the top and hyperbolic. Just over the past few years, there have been teams that won the WS with pitching staffs that were as good or worse that the Orioles.  '21 Braves starters 3.84, BP 3.97 '19 Nats 3.53, 5.68 '18 Red Sox 3.77, 3.72 '17 Astros 4.03, 4.27 '15 Royals 4.34, 2.72 '13 Red Sox 3.84, 3.70
    • That's the problem with using your top draft choices to draft the best player available: you can end up with an imbalance that makes it difficult to use all the talent you've got. You can reduce the problem by drafting shortstops, many of whom can move to the right along the defensive spectrum, but they can't all do that. And they can't pitch. You can fix an imbalance of talent by trading talented guys who are likely to be blocked by other, more talented guys. But if you're not willing to do that . . .
    • Yup, he's definitely in the same class.
    • You yourself admit that we need some acquisitions. That means that you agree that the team currently is inadequate. So, inadequate for what? I never said we wouldn’t make the playoffs, I said we would “slowly sink.” that’s neither an overreaction, nor certainly not ridiculous. Let me explain what I mean by “slowly sink.” I don’t think we will continue our same winning percentage, I don’t think we will win 100 games, and I don’t think we will win the division. That’s what I meant. If you disagree with those concerns, then you also think we don’t need to make any acquisitions, because you think we’re going to win as many games whether we do or don’t. But I doubt you disagree with them. Instead I think you probably don’t worry about them because even if all those things happen, we can still make the playoffs, and that’s fine, I agree with that I have no desire to be contentious. But those worries are certainly not ridiculous.
    • In a Divisional Series if we played the Mariners and Burnes pitches games 1 and 4 and Rodriguez pitches games 2 and 5 you would really take the Mariners who are scoring 3.9 runs a game and have an 8 run differential versus the Orioles who score 5.0 runs a game and have an 108 run differential because their third and fourth starters are better than the Orioles?  This is why I say the only thing coming unglued is the general sentiment on this message board.  I think we would heavy favorites against the Mariners in a 5 or 7 game series.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...