Jump to content

Gotta get help at the black hole at 2nd base


TouchemAll

Recommended Posts

2014 fWAR for second basemen (sorted by defense, admittedly)

inbs6w.jpg

Schoop is 7th defensively among all qualifiers with far fewer games. "Per game" he's been one of the five best in baseball at the position.

Yes, he is a disaster offensively (dead last among all 2B), but Brian Roberts is near the bottom BOTH offensively and defensively. 7 runs below replacement at the plate, 4 runs below on defense.

He's not what we need at second base.

Once again for the record, "If only we had drafted Anthony Rendon vice Hobgood....." :deadhorse::deadhorse::deadhorse:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 212
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I agree, and he's better than what we have.

I would like to upgrade Schoop if possible but I just don't think Roberts' offensive upgrade is enough to offset what we'd lose defensively. Just my opinion. Utley would be the answer to our dreams but I agree that we probably don't want any part of having him around beyond the 2015 season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've needed a second baseman since 2012. Duquette's failure to address that is a blight on his otherwise stellar record.

Up until this offseason, his hands were tied a bit with Roberts' contract. I agree though, he needs to do something about second base. I really don't know what Ivan DeJesus has done but I can't imagine he could be worse than what we have right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brian Cashman has told us all we need to know about Brian Roberts. Cashman says they will use Prado in the outfield and Drew at 2B.

Stephen Drew's OPS is under .600 this year. And, he hates playing 2B. But basically, Cashman dropped Roberts in favor of Schoop's all-field no-hit clone.

Brian Roberts is simply terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Up until this offseason, his hands were tied a bit with Roberts' contract. I agree though, he needs to do something about second base. I really don't know what Ivan DeJesus has done but I can't imagine he could be worse than what we have right now.

Yeah, the O's were right in not keeping Brian, but I don't understand not giving Dejesus a chance when it appears he's clearly a better choice at this point and has been probably since day 1 in Spring Training. At least play DeJesus at 2B in Norfolk to prepare him. Not many things Buck is involved with frustrates me, but not giving DeJesus the opportunity really does. I'm a fan of Schoop's potential, but it's clear that he was rushed - and that he's been rushed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that Davis and Cruz need to hit better than they have over the past month. But, the fact is, we are stuck with both of them whether they hit or not. Neither can be optioned and we're certainly not going to DFA either one of them. There is simply no replacing them. We rode Pearce's hot streak, but it's clearly over and he should come out of the lineup in favor of Delmon Young.

Schoop and Flaherty, on the other hand, have never had a hot streak and neither should get a start on this team. Secondbase is the area that should be addressed simply because it is the one area that can be addressed. Both have options. Schoop could clearly benefit from more time in the minors - he's still quite young. This is the one area that we could and should make an offensive up grade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roberts is not a significant offensive upgrade:

[TABLE=class: sortable stats_table row_summable]

<tbody>[TR=class: full hl, bgcolor: #DDEEFF]

[TD=align: left]2014[/TD]

[TD=align: right]36[/TD]

[TD=align: left]NYY[/TD]

[TD=align: left]AL[/TD]

[TD=align: right]91[/TD]

[TD=align: right]348[/TD]

[TD=align: right]317[/TD]

[TD=align: right]40[/TD]

[TD=align: right]75[/TD]

[TD=align: right]16[/TD]

[TD=align: right]4[/TD]

[TD=align: right]5[/TD]

[TD=align: right]21[/TD]

[TD=align: right]7[/TD]

[TD=align: right]4[/TD]

[TD=align: right]28[/TD]

[TD=align: right]53[/TD]

[TD=align: right].237[/TD]

[TD=align: right].300[/TD]

[TD=align: right].360[/TD]

[TD=align: right].659[/TD]

[TD=align: right]85[/TD]

[TD=align: right]114[/TD]

[TD=align: right]9[/TD]

[TD=align: right]1[/TD]

[TD=align: right]1[/TD]

[TD=align: right]1[/TD]

[TD=align: right]1[/TD]

[TD=align: left]*4

[/TD]

[/TR]

</tbody>[/TABLE]

[TABLE=class: sortable stats_table row_summable]

<tbody>[TR=class: full hl, bgcolor: #DDEEFF]

[TD=align: left]2014[/TD]

[TD=align: right]22[/TD]

[TD=align: left]BAL[/TD]

[TD=align: left]AL[/TD]

[TD=align: right]87[/TD]

[TD=align: right]318[/TD]

[TD=align: right]301[/TD]

[TD=align: right]31[/TD]

[TD=align: right]65[/TD]

[TD=align: right]10[/TD]

[TD=align: right]0[/TD]

[TD=align: right]8[/TD]

[TD=align: right]27[/TD]

[TD=align: right]0[/TD]

[TD=align: right]0[/TD]

[TD=align: right]8[/TD]

[TD=align: right]73[/TD]

[TD=align: right].216[/TD]

[TD=align: right].253[/TD]

[TD=align: right].329[/TD]

[TD=align: right].582[/TD]

[TD=align: right]62[/TD]

[TD=align: right]99[/TD]

[TD=align: right]12[/TD]

[TD=align: right]7[/TD]

[TD=align: right]2[/TD]

[TD=align: right]0[/TD]

[TD=align: right]0[/TD]

[TD=align: left]*45[/TD]

[/TR]

</tbody>[/TABLE]

77 points of OPS is significant if you ask me, and an 85 to 62 advantage in OPS+ is significant if you ask me. That's the difference between JJ Hardy and Jonathan Schoop this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that Davis and Cruz need to hit better than they have over the past month. But, the fact is, we are stuck with both of them whether they hit or not. Neither can be optioned and we're certainly not going to DFA either one of them. There is simply no replacing them. We rode Pearce's hot streak, but it's clearly over and he should come out of the lineup in favor of Delmon Young.

Schoop and Flaherty, on the other hand, have never had a hot streak and neither should get a start on this team. Secondbase is the area that should be addressed simply because it is the one area that can be addressed. Both have options. Schoop could clearly benefit from more time in the minors - he's still quite young. This is the one area that we could and should make an offensive up grade.

Can be addressed now or later?

Who can we go out and get that improves us, right now? Again, Schoop's been playing gold glove caliber 2B — literally, he's been better than Brandon Phillips, who won a GG last year.

So IMO this upgrade shouldn't take too much off the table defensively and upgrade significantly offensively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont understand why DD hasn't brought up another option for 2nd.

But, at this point, until the rosters expand in August, I wouldn't be surprise to see things stay as they are.

With that said, Buck did hint, that waiver trades are still allowed, and who knows what DD can pull off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can be addressed now or later?

Who can we go out and get that improves us, right now? Again, Schoop's been playing gold glove caliber 2B — literally, he's been better than Brandon Phillips, who won a GG last year.

So IMO this upgrade shouldn't take too much off the table defensively and upgrade significantly offensively.

Weeks, Lombardozi, DeJesus, and Parades could all provide solutions at 2B now if given a chance. I am not abandoning Schoop, by the way, I just feel he needs more time in the minors and is overmatched by ML pitchers at this point in time. Flaherty is a fine utility defensive player who can occassionally hit a long ball; but, he's not a starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

77 points of OPS is significant if you ask me, and an 85 to 62 advantage in OPS+ is significant if you ask me. That's the difference between JJ Hardy and Jonathan Schoop this year.

If you look at the splits of B-Rob, he has been in long and steady decline since a good April/May.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Schoop should have been in AAA two months ago. I've been strident about this since Spring Training. I agree with the majority of the decisions made by Buck and Duquette but this one they got dead wrong. Why they continue trotting the poor guy out there, I have no idea.

Give the lion's share of at-bats to Flaherty. He may not be much of an improvement, but he is one nonetheless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I'm not discounting anything, really.  I'm sure there's a reason for his recent struggles.   Playing devil's advocate with the "old" argument, there's no reason he couldn't have just hit a wall.  I think getting old for different players manifests itself in different ways and maybe he'll be effective for some stretches but ineffective for longer ones?  It's hard to say. I'm leaning towards that he's not fully healthy but that's probably a byproduct of being old, too.  10 years ago, this wouldn't have been a big workload for him, now it is.  He could withstand this usage at one point in his career, he can't now.  That's because he's worn down a bit.
    • Exactly. He’d get the McKenna treatment quick out the gate. “Can’t hit! Can’t field! He just cost us the game! What is he even doing on the team!” It’d be hilarious if it weren’t so predictable.
    • Ryan developed Hunter Harvey's situation last night. 
    • I think Urias is a guy (like a lot of guys) who benefits from consistent playing time.  I think his defense won't really slump, but when he's getting consistent at bats he's not a hole in the lineup.   It would be absolutely hilarious to see the "how bad could his defense be?" crowd to start eviscerating players who have been advertised as average defenders.  I want to see Mayo as much as everyone else outside of Roy, but I'm under no illusion he's an asset with the glove at third.  
    • Many ways up the mountain and there are plenty of other relievers who put up similar numbers and would command far less. If you look at production, Danny Coulumbe is having a similar year for us. Finnegan is alright, Yates is good, Clase, Robertson, there are a few guys that deliver similar results without the flash of 103 and there are also diamonds in the rough like Danny or like Suarez that can give you the same level but without the flash. I trust our scouts to find those guys as they have time and time again.
    • Closer by committee or not, the issue with the pen is that you need a guy with superb strikeout numbers to tilt the odds in extras with the ghost runner.  That is one of the hidden values in a guy like Bautista that gave us such a competitive advantage in 1 run games (in particular in extra innings). That and he could go for more than 3 outs (like he did 9 times last year). Luckily our team is better this year so we are not as reliant on winning close games. However, the day will come (in the postseason) where we will need to win a “battle of the bullpens” type of game. Right now I don’t like our odds in that scenario (especially if we were facing a team like the Yankees).
    • Again, it doesn’t matter who is on the other side of this equation. The question is, what do you do with Urias?  The other part is easy. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...