Jump to content

What does batting around mean?


BohKnowsBmore

What is "batting around?"  

111 members have voted

  1. 1. What is "batting around?"

    • Nine batters
      39
    • Ten or more batters
      72


Recommended Posts

If the inning ends with the 9th guy up, then you haven't batted around because you haven't come back to the original point. Just like a circle is complete when your pencil is at the exact same point as it was when you started, batting around is completed when the exact same batter who started the inning is up again.

Except a lineup is discrete, not continuous like the circumference of a circle.

I don't know which is correct. I'm not sure anybody really does, unless they know where it originated from. It seems more likely to me that the intention was for the answer to be 9, though the literal definition of the term would indicate 10. Who knows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply
You don't start with 9. You start with 1. Batter number 1. The first batter of the inning. If the inning ends with the 9th batter, then there's a gap from 9 to 1.

If you use this example, the length of the AB would be from one number to another. Therefore, if the 9th guy makes an out, the hand would be resting at 1 afterwards. Thus completing one full rotation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Around has a circular reference. When you complete one circumference of a circle from a point on the circle back to the same point, you have gone "around" the circle. You do not have to pass the point. 9 is the answer

But the circle is not complete with 9 hitters, as we did not get back to the leadoff man. There is a small hole in the circle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you use this example, the length of the AB would be from one number to another. Therefore, if the 9th guy makes an out, the hand would be resting at 1 afterwards. Thus completing one full rotation.

The hand wouldn't be resting there until the team bats in the next inning. Therefore they didn't bat around unless the guy that batted first in the inning, bats for a second time in the inning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The hand wouldn't be resting there until the team bats in the next inning. Therefore they didn't bat around unless the guy that batted first in the inning, bats for a second time in the inning.

But as soon as the batter comes up a 2nd time, there's an overlap. So there shouldn't be a hole if he doesn't come up again. Theoretically, it should be complete since there should be no gap between the end of the 9th AB and the start of the 10th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But as soon as the batter comes up a 2nd time, there's an overlap. So there shouldn't be a hole if he doesn't come up again. Theoretically, it should be complete since there should be no gap between the end of the 9th AB and the start of the 10th.

Of course, you could argue that the circle is measured in time, not AB's. Thus, the time it takes to finish the next half-inning could be a hole.

Great...now I'm arguing with myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL this is silly.. batting around is only when the leadoff hitter of the inning comes up to hit for the second time in the same inning. If that does not happen then they did not technically "bat around"; if nine players end up batting they just bat through the entire order.

I've always interpreted "batting around" to mean "batting through the entire order." So nine would do the trick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But as soon as the batter comes up a 2nd time, there's an overlap. So there shouldn't be a hole if he doesn't come up again. Theoretically, it should be complete since there should be no gap between the end of the 9th AB and the start of the 10th.

Huh? Look use a clock, (and I know a baseball lineup only has 9 but it's the same difference) you start at 12 noon (1st batter of inning) and get to 11 pm (11th batter of inning) and 11 pm makes the 3rd out. Has the clock gone all the way around to 12 am or is it still at 11 pm, until the next time up?

Or use my walk around the block example. If you leave the house and walk around your neighborhood, have you made it all the way back around if you end up next door instead of your house (where you started from)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • High school players are also less likely to make the majors than college players. Picking Abrams or Witt would also increase the chances your 1:1 pick is a bust, or at least less than you hoped for. When I say Adley wasn't a "safe" pick, I meant that the Orioles didn't sacrifice much, if any, ceiling to raise the floor. I remember the vast majority of pundits saying that Adley was the most likely player in the draft to be an excellent baseball player. A few said they thought Witt or Abrams had a higher ceiling, but they also were less likely to reach it than Adley. And even they were like, "slightly higher ceiling, much lower floor, and C is more valuable than SS." Even if more all-star level players come out of high school, in that particular draft Adley was a special player who had a super high floor and a super high ceiling. The fact that high school players are more likely in general to be all-stars shouldn't blind one to the fact that there was an incredibly special college talent available at 1:1. Bottom line is the idea that the O's should have picked anyone other than Adley in that draft was a small minority opinion on draft day, and the fact that Witt and maybe Abrams ended up hitting their ceilings doesn't change the fact that Adley was the obvious choice with the information available at the time, and it's not like it didn't work out awesome for us. I would say Adley is definitely more likely to be a HOF than Abrams and probably Witt, too.
    • Yeah, but Westburg has become such a staple to the lineup and begun to establish himself offensively I thought they might do the Gunnar thing and say 3B is yours.  No more back and forth. 
    • I'm rambling now, but the 1928 A's may have been one of the coolest teams ever to hang around. Not only did they have a bunch of these old IL Orioles, and an unbelievable stock of young talent. But Mack had brought in some old guys, I guess to provide leadership and mentoring and the like. So on this one team they had the younger HOFs: Mickey Cochrane, Al Simmons, Jimmie Foxx, Lefty Grove. They had the Orioles in Boley, Bishop, Grove, Earnshaw. But on top of all that, they had 41-year-old Ty Cobb, 40-year-old Tris Speaker, 41-year-old Eddie Collins, 44-year-old Jack Quinn, and 35-year-old Bullet Joe Bush. Of course Cobb, Speaker, and Collins are inner-circle HOFers, among the best to ever play their position. Quinn was a grandfathered spitballer, probably worthy of a book or three, who won 96 games in his 40s and pitched his last MLB game at the age of 50. And Bush had a 17-year career where he won 196 games. The '28 A's won 98 games and only finished 2.5 games behind a Yanks team that was the freakin' '27 Yanks the year before. For '29 Mack say goodbye to Cobb, Speaker, made Collins a coach, plugged in the kids, and ran away with the league for three straight years. Until the Depression hit, Connie didn't have any other sources of income or wealth, and for the 2nd time had to sell off his stars to make payroll.
    • If they really want to get his bat going, send him to Delmarva!
    • Sounds like the FO believes Norby and Mayo (both righties) need to work more on their defense Holliday and Stowers (both lefties) need to work more on their hitting
    • Not to take away from Drungo's "Old Timey baseball" review segment, Cowser's early season SSS success against lefties has been pretty notable. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...