Jump to content

Roch (MASN): DL Hall is joining Orioles tonight


eddie83

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Roll Tide said:

He’s a B comp round pick (2nd rounder). Who has gotten through the minors in 2+ season and would be here if we weren’t doing so well. I think he’s more valuable in a deal if he’s has an extra year of control. I’m not saying he’s going to be a star but he has a .900 OPS in the last 2 season and 800 at bats.

I do not think it is likely that teams are going to attach much excess value to his last year of arbitration.

Most guys that make it to the majors don't make it that far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I do not think it is likely that teams are going to attach much excess value to his last year of arbitration.

Most guys that make it to the majors don't make it that far.

What’s been shown to have more value, a rental for 3 months or a player with an additional year of control. I doubt he’s traded anytime unless all the guys below him continue the fast charge. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

It’s throwing a baseball.  He does it well until he doesn’t.  He does it well like 49% of the time.  Pitching on the big stage is scary.  For someone who isn’t a strike thrower, the big stage can get scarier.  I believe in putting people on positions where they can succeed and then build on success.  DL will be good but don’t like him as a SP right now.  

Eh, he struck out six and walked three. He didn’t look scared. It was a great opportunity and he has room to improve. That doesn’t make the decision wrong or his performance a failure.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Um ..no 

You insinuated that I was exaggerating his performance by a 1/4 of a run per game to make your point. A 4.76 ERA and 5.00 ERA at AAA are both pretty bad. 
 

He was called up when he was pitching his worst. I asked a question about his era over those last 4 starts that has sabotaged his season and you ignore it with the comment in this post. You can make all the excuses you want but the reality remains the same.

2 of his last 4 starts have been bad. His last start in AAA he allowed 2 runs over 5+ innings with 8k’s.

I didn’t insinuate anything, you were exaggerating his numbers. I didn’t call you a liar or anything like that. You need to take it easy.

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Roll Tide said:

What’s been shown to have more value, a rental for 3 months or a player with an additional year of control. I doubt he’s traded anytime unless all the guys below him continue the fast charge. 

I don't think the O's got a lick more for Schoop with the extra year of control attached.

A guy only has more value if teams think he going to provide excess value over his salary.

If a guy is a probable non-tender at arb 3/4 prices the team picking him up won't pay for that extra year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

Anyone who judges Hall’s stuff based on watching 3+ innings of his first major league appearance needs to reevaluate their scouting skills.

Thank you. I’m not saying he’ll be a successful ML starter, but one ML start does not a ML career make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

Eh, he struck out six and walked three. He didn’t look scared. It was a great opportunity and he has room to improve. That doesn’t make the decision wrong or his performance a failure.

I love the guy and am a huge fan.  I think he will be great.  There is  just something going on that he hasn’t quite figured out yet.  I’d think small doses of success v. Throw him out there would be a better approach, but I’ll defer to the Pros. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Was Adley hurt in 2021?

Grayson should have been up before he got hurt.

Mountcastle should have been up, and working on stuff, when rosters expanded in 2019.

I said I thought you could make an argument for Adley in 2021. But the counter is he only played 43 games in AAA by the end of 2021. Elias has definitely been slow to promote top guys, but it’s disengenuous to assume it’s only because of service time manipulation. 

GrayRod had 11 AAA starts. He was clearly about to get promoted. And then had an unfortunate injury. You can disagree about how Elias promotes guys, but this wasn’t a service time thing. 
 

Same thing with Mountcastle. 
 

If they wanted to manipulate time, why not keep Hall down until May? Or till September and preserve rookie status? Seems an unlikely time to promote him. Unless service time isn’t the concern. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

He’s a B comp round pick (2nd rounder). Who has gotten through the minors in 2+ season and would be here if we weren’t doing so well. I think he’s more valuable in a deal if he’s has an extra year of control. I’m not saying he’s going to be a star but he has a .900 OPS in the last 2 season and 800 at bats.

If they deal him this offseason, I doubt 40 games of ML experience & service time plays much of a role in his value. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

For crying out loud. He’s been struggling mightily in his last handful of starts. Nit pick the era but trying to pretend it’s an exaggeration just makes you look like a fool.

So genius…What was his ERA over his last 4 starts? More than 5 runs per game right?  This was stupid move by Elias and Hyde for buying in. The poor decision cost us a chance to win today. 

Hindsight is 20/20.  Lets see how his career goes from here before we make any final evaluations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, brvn52 said:

I said I thought you could make an argument for Adley in 2021. But the counter is he only played 43 games in AAA by the end of 2021. Elias has definitely been slow to promote top guys, but it’s disengenuous to assume it’s only because of service time manipulation. 

GrayRod had 11 AAA starts. He was clearly about to get promoted. And then had an unfortunate injury. You can disagree about how Elias promotes guys, but this wasn’t a service time thing. 
 

Same thing with Mountcastle. 
 

If they wanted to manipulate time, why not keep Hall down until May? Or till September and preserve rookie status? Seems an unlikely time to promote him. Unless service time isn’t the concern. 

And they are sending Hall back down.

We'll see how much service time he ends up with.

I also wouldn't be shocked if Hall is an up and down guy while he's option-able.  Could take a while to earn enough service time to reach free agency.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Pickles said:

He "didn't miss bats."

Checks notes......

6 Ks in 3+ innings.

Missed 7 bats..below average swingstr% of just under 15%.  This is a guy that had a 40% whiff% on each of his pitches in the minors last year.

His stuff wasn’t impressive today and the stats and his pro career back that up.  It doesn’t mean he doesn’t have impressive stuff but he rarely got into the upper 90s and even Big Ben said he was expecting to see 100 today.  He was more 96 for most of the day. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

Eh, he struck out six and walked three. He didn’t look scared. It was a great opportunity and he has room to improve. That doesn’t make the decision wrong or his performance a failure.

In no way was it the wrong decision.  That’s an absurd thought.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm starting to wonder if he was becoming unteachable and angsty about not being called up. Speculation only and he seems to be well liked. But, I'm sure he has been in the minors much longer than he wanted. He probably thought he earned a call up in the middle of that hot stretch after the tipping pitches comment. The Elias phone call, the obscure call-up, a B line-up debut without your favorite catcher catching you. "Alright, show us what you can do." That's a reality check. A teachable moment. "Trust us." As someone that's managed employees for awhile, I think all of this is very calculated.

I hope he comes out of the pen dominant thru the stretch. He's got loads of talent, no doubt about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • THIS. I said it last night in the game thread. This stupid six man rotation and moving starters around like chess pieces messes w/ their routines. You have to get Burnes on turn every 5 days to maximize him and then everyone else is like roulette. After last night, Kremer should just be moved to the pen and go back to a 5 man rotation.
    • Kremer denied both the blister and the extra rest as reasons, as any pitcher normally would. I tend to think both absolutely were a factor regardless of what he said. Would have been a convenient way to keep Irvin in the rotation and get Dean some extra time to get comfortable after getting the blister removed. It's extremely painful to deal with a popped blister and it takes a long time to form a new callous, etc.  Just my opinion, no huge deal either way. 
    • I still read it as “we predicted this before the season but now we’re predicting this”.
    • Yep, the league has already started to pitch Gunnar more carefully (on all ABs not just leadoff) and we are seeing his walk totals go up over last two weeks. In terms of seeing 1 pitch to hit an AB, Gunnar was definitely sitting on 2 strike sweeper from Gray last night that he deposited in CF bleachers.  You just don’t go oppo taco on outside edge breaking ball on one of the best spinners in the league.  Love how Gunnar is hunting certain pitches now.  Thought the same thing given the swings he put on Kirby’s split for HR (Sunday). 
    • If the Orioles really thought Cook was a potential MLB option, I don’t think they would have sent him back to AA when they didn’t have roster space at AAA early in the season. He’s having a very good year though so he could potentially change their view of him.  The other obstacle is he may not get a 40-man spot this off-season despite being rule 5 eligible the first time, there’s a lot of potential additions.  If Norby isn’t traded, he’ll get one of them and Cook’s only advantages over Norby are speed and CF defense, which may not be enough (especially if Mateo is still around). And shortly behind them is Fabian, who is Rule 5 eligible after 2025 and offers those things better than Cook (albeit still with big question marks about his K rate).  I could see Cook threading the needle and get some cup of coffee opportunity between Norby and Fabian if the need arises, but the Orioles have stacked so much bench depth for next couple years there would probably need to be a significant shakeup with trades and/or injuries. 
    • Well I think Szymborski would say those ZIPs numbers are 50th percentile but even the 80th percentile had Gunnar at 148 OPS+ and 6.2 fWAR (link to O’s preseason write up on fangraphs)
    • Is this an attempt at a joke? A troll post? Something else? ... I'm not sure what to do with such a preposterous notion (unless it was stated in jest).
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...