Jump to content

Bautista 2023


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Chaka Garcia said:

Givens and Tate can’t get here quick enough. However, no guarantee they will be effective right off the bat.

Yeah the bullpen has potential to be really good when/if everyone gets healthy. I think the question becomes who do we send down. Are they ready to potentially lose Voth or Perez?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, oriole said:

As soon as I saw him pitching at 97, I knew something was off. I just hope it’s not an injury. He looked terrible last night and it’s a miracle that he didn’t blow it. 

That’s the “downside” of winning so many close games… you run your closer into the ground. 
 

Cano should help.  I can’t believe how good he’s been. 162 is a marathon. We have to keep the big guy healthy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

That’s the “downside” of winning so many close games… you run your closer into the ground. 

Cano should help.  I can’t believe how good he’s been. 162 is a marathon. We have to keep the big guy healthy. 

That would be unnecessary if not for the insistence of having a “closer”. Baumann, Cano, Baker or even Coulumbe or Akin as lefties should be considered based on high leverage, workload and matchups. 

If the 8th inning brings the opposition’s 3,4, and 5 hitters I’d rather see my best guy then. If he’s locked into only the 9th that can’t happen.

Bautista has struggled with the splitter lately, but he still looks like the guy. A 100 mph FB is a nice thing on which to fall back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

That would be unnecessary if not for the insistence of having a “closer”. Baumann, Cano, Baker or even Coulumbe or Akin as lefties should be considered based on high leverage, workload and matchups. 

If the 8th inning brings the opposition’s 3,4, and 5 hitters I’d rather see my best guy then. If he’s locked into only the 9th that can’t happen.

Bautista has struggled with the splitter lately, but he still looks like the guy. A 100 mph FB is a nice thing on which to fall back.

Agreed.  Many of us in the game thread were opining about keeping Akin in before the trouble even started.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mooreisbetter27 said:

Agreed.  Many of us in the game thread were opining about keeping Akin in before the trouble even started.  

Akin gets little love here, but his numbers weren’t helped early on in one particular outing where he was cursed with back to back cheap hits only to have Hyde bring in Baker who wasn’t sharp and promptly allowed a walk and a hit scoring two tins that were charged to Akin. 
 

Akin has always had a good spin rate on his FB and the slider works, while last night the CH looked good. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Getz said:

He's been looking terrible, we're lucky he hasn't blown saves.

Will be interesting to see how this plays out.  Will Hyde pull him out of the role if he continues to accumulate Saves while looking less than dominant? 

I think most managers will keep their "closer" in the role until they completely melt down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

That would be unnecessary if not for the insistence of having a “closer”. Baumann, Cano, Baker or even Coulumbe or Akin as lefties should be considered based on high leverage, workload and matchups. 

If the 8th inning brings the opposition’s 3,4, and 5 hitters I’d rather see my best guy then. If he’s locked into only the 9th that can’t happen.

Bautista has struggled with the splitter lately, but he still looks like the guy. A 100 mph FB is a nice thing on which to fall back.

The closer-by-committee approach is a tricky one to get right; plenty of teams have tried and failed at it. Even the Rays seem to be shifting back to having one guy designated as the closer this year (so far). I do hope that the return of Tate and Givens will open things up to where Hyde doesn't feel the need to bring Bautista in for every three-run save.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He did look bad last night and his velocity was obviously down.  But, at least by my eyeball test, he hasn't had the splitter working the way it did last year.  In the early games I chalked it up to the colder weather, but I think he's still trying to get the splitter working right.  Other than last night, the velocity has been there, so when he get's the splitter working he should (hopefully) be lights out again.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Will be interesting to see how this plays out.  Will Hyde pull him out of the role if he continues to accumulate Saves while looking less than dominant? 

I think most managers will keep their "closer" in the role until they completely melt down.

Like he has with Perez? Again, there’s no reason to keep these guys in defined roles. We know the overall range of performance for relievers in general can fluctuate wildly, but managers insist on having closers and, to a lesser degree, set up men. 

I’ll say they lose a couple games just based on Hyde staying with him no matter what, like you said, until a melt down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BRobinsonfan said:

He did look bad last night and his velocity was obviously down.  But, at least by my eyeball test, he hasn't had the splitter working the way it did last year.  In the early games I chalked it up to the colder weather, but I think he's still trying to get the splitter working right.  Other than last night, the velocity has been there, so when he get's the splitter working he should (hopefully) be lights out again.   

Was it really down? I mean, I saw 99 and 100.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

Like he has with Perez? Again, there’s no reason to keep these guys in defined roles. We know the overall range of performance for relievers in general can fluctuate wildly, but managers insist on having closers and, to a lesser degree, set up men. 

I’ll say they lose a couple games just based on Hyde staying with him no matter what, like you said, until a melt down.

I wouldn't go that far.

The truth is that massaging egos and keeping players mentally ready to play is part of Hyde's job.

Yes I think that Managers shouldn't structure their bullpen use around the Save stat but demoting a Closer can have an impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, waroriole said:

Yeah the bullpen has potential to be really good when/if everyone gets healthy. I think the question becomes who do we send down. Are they ready to potentially lose Voth or Perez?

In fairness, the bullpen has been "really good" so far.

2.74 ERA. Third best in MLB. Better than every team in the National League.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • How about..." we wont win another game in the regular season"?
    • i still like that winning your division matters, at least a little bit.  So I think there's a happy medium between how unbalanced it was, and what you are suggesting.  13 games vs each division team feels right to me, but there are going to be years where that skews the WC thing a bit, because there's always one really bad team, it seems, somewhere (not always as bad as the ChiSox, of course).  I'm not sure how else to further balance it.  Maybe cut back on the NL stuff a bit and play more games against your non-divisional conference rivals so at least there's more head to head to base the WC on.
    • Apparently this post of mine from one year ago killed this thread, as it was the last before today's bump.  In re-reading that, I am reminded (by a past version of myself, LOL) of why I love this sport.  It was actually a bit invigorating reading that back to myself.  LETS GO BIRDS!
    • I've found the older I get, the less interest I have in watching my teams lose. It's a waste of time so I find something else to do. Watching my team lose is not enjoyable so I'd rather do something I'd enjoy. It's not like I'm that old either, just 47. I get a lot more enjoyment out of watching good games with other teams, to be honest. Watching the Bills in the first half last night was fun. The Redskins/Bengals game was fun to watch. Man City and Arsenal on Sunday was great. The Chiefs/Falcons game was a good game. There were a few decent college football games this last weekend as well. I'll watch the game to start tonight and if the O's are down 3-0 after the 1st inning, I'll find something else to do, probably watch some of the other MLB games that have playoff implications.
    • It will be interesting to see if there is any carry over from the HBP's culminating in Heston's beaning.  Hate to say it but that's around when the .500 play started, now much worse.  I did like the way HK stared down Holmes after being hit-I think this series will mean a little more to him.
    • It’s O’s and Yanks. Good guys versus bad guys. Baby Birds up against the Evil Empire — and another trip to the post-season is in the cards. I’ve been cheering for the O’s and very specifically against the Yanks going on six decades, and I’m getting good at it. So, yeah. I’m fired up. Now ask me about hopes and dreams. I don’t think this Orioles team is going to make a run to WS this year.  They have scuffled, they have failed — but I’m reminded, even in the platinum age of data — baseball is still a game of failure.  And man, runners in scoring position over the last week, I’m not sure I want to know that number. They’re still my guys. As long as they’re in it, so am I.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...