Jump to content

Cease vs everyone else


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, E-D-D-I-E said:

Burnes. Easily.

Cost will be less on prospects and he sits at the top of the rotation. No long term risk and maybe he will want to stay. 

Even if he wants to stay, the Os won’t pay him (and they shouldn’t)

Im not so sure he costs less to acquire either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HakunaSakata said:

Attainable? That's very debatable considering the White Sox are going to try and make suitors overpay for that 2022 season. Also, I'm not sure what him finishing 2nd for the Cy Young two years ago really matters since that season is pretty clearly the outlier in his career. If anything it's the reason we shouldn't trade for him. We're trading for what we think he will do, not what he did once but is unlikely to ever do again. 

He had a 111 ERA+ in 2020, 112 in 2021.   For his career, including both his best and his worst, he’s at 113.   If I’m chasing him, that’s what I think I’m buying.  He’s comparable to free agents Eduardo Rodriguez (112) and Aaron Nola (113) in that regard, but younger.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I generally have a beer and tacos attitude towards Cease and Burnes this winter to save hairsplitting efforts.    Both are strong front of rotation guys.     Both would let you bid with Kremer, Hall, Wells, McDermott type guys more freely.     If Hall-McDermott go for the first guy and you don't get the second guy, Kyle Gibson or an equivalent will always be there late for Adam Frazier money.

Just peaked at Cease's draft year to remind myself of his bonus ($1.5mm) - he and Justin Steele were a couple big money high school Arms accessible by cutting a deal with Kyle Schwarber.

Gerrit Cole had a 112 ERA+ as a Pirate, and Dylan Cease's career mark is 113.     

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Frobby said:

He had a 111 ERA+ in 2020, 112 in 2021.   For his career, including both his best and his worst, he’s at 113.   If I’m chasing him, that’s what I think I’m buying.  He’s comparable to free agents Eduardo Rodriguez (112) and Aaron Nola (113) in that regard, but younger.  

I understand the E-Rod comparison, but if you look at other stats/metrics than Nola has had many more successful seasons than Cease, including one on par with Cease's 2022 season. I also think that Nola's pitching profile is more likely to age better than Cease's. There's very little margin for error when you flirt with leading MLB in walks nearly every season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

I understand the E-Rod comparison, but if you look at other stats/metrics than Nola has had many more successful seasons than Cease, including one on par with Cease's 2022 season. I also think that Nola's pitching profile is more likely to age better than Cease's. There's very little margin for error when you flirt with leading MLB in walks nearly every season. 

Is Aaron Nola a realistic target for the Orioles?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

I understand the E-Rod comparison, but if you look at other stats/metrics than Nola has had many more successful seasons than Cease, including one on par with Cease's 2022 season. I also think that Nola's pitching profile is more likely to age better than Cease's. There's very little margin for error when you flirt with leading MLB in walks nearly every season. 

Nola is projected to get $150m/6 years by mlbtraderumors. I would go that route if he would sign for 3 years $75m. This is where Cease’s value comes into play.

Cease keeps growing on me, but i believe the trade will have to include a SP prospect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I think the Cease vs Burnes vs Gray argument is interesting.  Cease is how I lean but obviously cost matters.

I wonder what the analytics come up with on each of these pitcher profiles matching with the Orioles current SP/RP.

The Rays SP/RP portfolio has been mentioned for having different arm angles (in game analysis) the last several years. I think this will play into the type of acquisition the O’s will commit to.

Is Cease too similar to Bradish or Rodriguez? Or, is Nola to finesse for the playoff atmosphere?

I was at game one against the Rangers and Botchy focused on lefty matchups against Henderson as much as was possible. The O’s also struggled against pitchers throwing backwards, which can be more attributable to the atmosphere and lower MLB experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HakunaSakata said:

I understand the E-Rod comparison, but if you look at other stats/metrics than Nola has had many more successful seasons than Cease, including one on par with Cease's 2022 season. I also think that Nola's pitching profile is more likely to age better than Cease's. There's very little margin for error when you flirt with leading MLB in walks nearly every season. 

Oh, I’d rather have Nola for the next two years than Cease, no doubt about it.  But you’re not getting Nola for two years, you’re getting him for at least six at a very high annual cost.  That’s why Cease might be the better option.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

I can count the pitchers I would rather have over Cease on 2 hands, at least.

Me too, but how many do you think will agree to contracts of three years or less?  I don't know for sure (who does?), but I suspect three years will max out the O's comfort level this offseason.  I wish it was different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • 1) I don't think it's a bad idea to consider moving on from non-productive vets like Hays and possibly Mullins as well. 2) I'm almost starting to move toward the opinion of re-signing Santander. He is likely not to require a major financial commitment (3/4 years at modest money). And I believe because most of his contributions come from counting stats (homers and RBIs) he is likely to be undervalued in this era of statcast baseball. 3) Elias has never (IMO for good reason) decided to take the approach of multiple/several first timers learning on the job at all at once. The potential for that to go sideways represents too much risk, when you are trying to win a World Series. 4) You didn't just mention moving on from Mullins and Hays. But you also mentioned Santander, O'Hearn, and Mountcastle. That is FIVE regulars and replacing them all with players who have never proven that they can hit Major League pitching. I would almost bet that there aren't 5 first timers in all of MLB who are succeeding this season on their first try. Now obviously, for Holliday next season will be his second try. And I guess 3rd for Stowers, maybe 4th depending how you look at it. And second/third for Kjerstad, Norby (I guess second). Though some of these guys stints were so short, I don't know if they could even get/make much of it some of those previous times. 5) If we make it to the postseason (which we are almost assured to do) win or lose this year in the Fall, it will be a very poor message to send to the fanbase to not spend/add in the offseason. With a payroll this low (ranked what 25th?) you should not be cutting cost and especially with a multi-billionaire owner. 6) If you don't trade any of these players this season, how do you propose that we get better/get the piece(s) that we need? 7) Even with all of these new young players and even if all of them performed right away, where is the pitching going to come from next season in order to legitimately contend (if you don't spend in the offseason)?
    • Nobody thought Toronto would not cash in on their "window". It slammed shut on them and they had a lot of young talent that regressed pretty hard. Cautionary tales are out there.
    • What an odd question. Of course it’s important. The entire baseball world will be paying attention to this series. The two best teams in all baseball, in the same division, each going for a crown at the expense of the other, and neither a big fan of the other. Wins are important regardless of the opponent, but it also goes without saying that we would rather win three out of four against the Yankees, than three out of four against the Athletics, or even other contenders like the Mariners or Guards.  
    • Yeah, too much young talent for that to happen next year, unless some major regression and injuries happen.
    • Mike Elias' job certainly entails doing due diligence on Jack Flaherty again.  
    • even if they do, so what? 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...