Jump to content

BRob News to Come on Thursday?


Aglets

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 159
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Like others have said, I really want to see if the first year will start at 2009 or 2010.

Hopefully 2009.

Who Cares? Not being a jerk. But really though. The guy wants to be here and play for the Orioles for the next four years. To me thats exciting and refreshing. Who do we have behind Robert's to replace him? No one. He is deserving of a good deal and he is getting one. Cant we all just be glad that a player who has been in this organization from day one and has experienced the losing, wants to stay and be here? Its a great day to be an O's fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like others have said, I really want to see if the first year will start at 2009 or 2010.

Hopefully 2009.

4/$40M extension per Roch.

http://masnsports.com/index_blog_roch.html

I think the 4th/5th year (however you look at it) will be pretty bad by the time we get there, but we'll be between indifferent and enamored with the deal up until that time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who Cares? Not being a jerk. But really though. The guy wants to be here and play for the Orioles for the next four years. To me thats exciting and refreshing. Who do we have behind Robert's to replace him? No one. He is deserving of a good deal and he is getting one. Cant we all just be glad that a player who has been in this organization from day one and has experienced the losing, wants to stay and be here? Its a great day to be an O's fan.
It was a pretty great day when Jay Gibbons signed his contract extension too, huh? Because just about everything you just said about Roberts applied to Gibbons before he signed his deal as well.

Gibbons was never as good as Roberts, but he signed a smaller deal. The same principles apply. This deal will likely be looked at as a bad one in the final year, and thats fine, you accept that with any long term deal. The real rub will be if Roberts declines so fast that we are stuck with him being vastly overpaid for more than just the 2013 season. If not, it'll be looked at as a good deal in retrospect, if so, the people against it will be viewed as correct.

I am very excited that Roberts will be on the team for the next 3 years at least though. Beyond that, lets hope he's one of the guys who stays good beyond the typical aging curve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a pretty great day when Jay Gibbons signed his contract extension too, huh? Because just about everything you just said about Roberts applied to Gibbons before he signed his deal as well.

Gibbons was never as good as Roberts, but he signed a smaller deal. The same principles apply. This deal will likely be looked at as a bad one in the final year, and thats fine, you accept that with any long term deal. The real rub will be if Roberts declines so fast that we are stuck with him being vastly overpaid for more than just the 2013 season. If not, it'll be looked at as a good deal in retrospect, if so, the people against it will be viewed as correct.

I am very excited that Roberts will be on the team for the next 3 years at least though. Beyond that, lets hope he's one of the guys who stays good beyond the typical aging curve.

Apparently the team feels he will be worth the investment for 4 years. And don't expect him to as you say "decline so fast" Gibbons and Melvin are totally different situations in my mind. Robert's has more tangibles to his game than those guys have. Robert's hits, he steals, he fields, and he is a leader. I think he is just coming into his prime. Again like I said in the Pie thread..call me crazy, But I hope this contract starts in 2010.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a pretty great day when Jay Gibbons signed his contract extension too, huh? Because just about everything you just said about Roberts applied to Gibbons before he signed his deal as well.

Gibbons was never as good as Roberts, but he signed a smaller deal. The same principles apply. This deal will likely be looked at as a bad one in the final year, and thats fine, you accept that with any long term deal. The real rub will be if Roberts declines so fast that we are stuck with him being vastly overpaid for more than just the 2013 season. If not, it'll be looked at as a good deal in retrospect, if so, the people against it will be viewed as correct.

I am very excited that Roberts will be on the team for the next 3 years at least though. Beyond that, lets hope he's one of the guys who stays good beyond the typical aging curve.

I don't think Gibbons' contract has any relevance to this deal at all. Gibbons was a one trick pony. He was always bad in the field and had only had one good year with the bat. He had an injury history to boot. He should have never been paid the contract he was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a pretty great day when Jay Gibbons signed his contract extension too, huh? Because just about everything you just said about Roberts applied to Gibbons before he signed his deal as well.

Gibbons was never as good as Roberts, but he signed a smaller deal. The same principles apply. This deal will likely be looked at as a bad one in the final year, and thats fine, you accept that with any long term deal. The real rub will be if Roberts declines so fast that we are stuck with him being vastly overpaid for more than just the 2013 season. If not, it'll be looked at as a good deal in retrospect, if so, the people against it will be viewed as correct.

I am very excited that Roberts will be on the team for the next 3 years at least though. Beyond that, lets hope he's one of the guys who stays good beyond the typical aging curve.

The big difference between Gibbons and Roberts is that Gibbons was a DH with a league-average bat, which is worth about $1.50 on the open market, while Brian Roberts is a top-40 in the world kind of player and will probably be worth more five years from now than Gibbons was at his peak.

Don't confuse possibly overpaying for very good talent with wildly overestimating the value of a decent player on a bad team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not surprised in the least. The basic reason is that I think that AM's approach is a lot more... um... what's the word?... how about "holistic"?

By this, I mean to convey that [stuff deleted]

Tangent:

Anybody know why it's "holistic" and not "wholistic"?

I looked it up, and it refers to "holism"... which itself is defined by using the word "whole".

English make no sense. It's beyond me how anybody who doesn't grow up with English can ever learn it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tangent:

Anybody know why it's "holistic" and not "wholistic"?

I looked it up, and it refers to "holism"... which itself is defined by using the word "whole".

English make no sense. It's beyond me how anybody who doesn't grow up with English can ever learn it.

Because the root is Greek, not English. Holos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I'm in the Cincinnati market. I'm gonna be a criminal this weekend I guess.
    • I think they’re a good team and I don’t think this was all that one sided of a series.  A couple of those hard hit balls vs Kremer don’t find gloves, and a few of those dinks off Nestor don’t find holes, and could have been a different story. 
    • The question becomes who is more helpful to the team with Urias and Mckenna.  I know most will say Urias but what has he done the year plus, last 140 games, that would help the team.  He has been worth -.2 WAR  where Mckenna has been worth .2 WAR  So there on the field difference is not much if any.  Urias has a lot of guys that can replace him at 2nd and 3rd.  Mateo, Holliday, Norby, Mayo, Westburg Henderson combination can all play 2nd or 3rd.  Mckenna can play centerfield which is the one position that we seem to not have a lot of options for.  Mullins can do it for sure,  Cowser struggled last year greatly at it.  Hays always has injury issues and his legs giving him trouble again and looked like he lost a step this season, granted sometimes it looks like he can't run around the bases but then makes a nice play in the outfield running things down.  Mateo looks like he can play center but the bat can be a question and most the people on here wanted him let go this off season.  With the questions of Hays injuries it might be better to keep Mckenna around then Urias in the short term and by end of the year I hope both are gone and the younger guys are playing for both of them.  
    • 2 - 0   4 - 2   2 - 0  7 - 2   All cept the last very close. Going to be a year long battle with injuries playing a role as we go. Hope the latter impacts The Evil Empire more than us. We pitched well all series. They almost did. Our defense is better by a long shot. Stanton is coming close to being their Chris Davis. Judge is potentially a beast but I'm betting players his size don't age well (see Stanton) over a 162 game season with the demands put on baseball players. And particularly New York demands. Let's see how we do in their house. 
    • The payroll didn’t stand out to me during the series. And it’s not something that I generally pay attention during the season. Most good teams tend to have a higher payroll. And ours will increase dramatically soon. I actually tend to root for all players to get paid (regardless of team). They have such a limited window to make generation(s) transforming kind of money. And if the players don’t get it, then it goes back into the owners’ billionaire pockets. I’m certainly not rooting for that!
    • I seriously doubt it.  But I’ve argued that Hyde should use Kimbrel no more than 5 times every two weeks, and if he followed my advice (ha ha) that means we’d need a “Plan B” when Kimbrel is not available, and Webb is one of the guys you can use in that role, depending on matchups.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...