Jump to content

Mike Trout To Undergo Knee Surgery


byrdz

Recommended Posts

This dude is washed.  Not because of talent - we've seen this  month he's got plenty of that left.  But the guy is never going to be on the field long enough to show it again, that much seems clear.

Is his HOF candidacy already assured, or no?  If not its going to get dicey as to whether he's even a HOFer now, which is pretty shocking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I think he already has the numbers to be in the Hall.  The writers make exceptions for guys they love like Koufax and Puckett.  But they probably deserved it anyway as well.   

You cant be the undisputed best player in MLB for six years and not go into the Hall. 

How many massive ten year contracts work out?  I don't really understand why teams don't just balk at the length and let some other sap team do it.   This last time Machado pulled out of his contract I would of let him walk.  

You wait and see the Dodgers will regret signing Ohtani in the next three or four years.  

Edited by Gurgi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/1/2024 at 11:42 AM, Gurgi said:

I think he already has the numbers to be in the Hall.  The writers make exceptions for guys they love like Koufax and Puckett.  But they probably deserved it anyway as well.   

You cant be the undisputed best player in MLB for six years and not go into the Hall. 

How many massive ten year contracts work out?  I don't really understand why teams don't just balk at the length and let some other sap team do it.   This last time Machado pulled out of his contract I would of let him walk.  

You wait and see the Dodgers will regret signing Ohtani in the next three or four years.  

Dodgers will be fine.  They'll make way more than 400M out of the Ohtani deal.

He's such a unicorn he comes with his own revenue streams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Fiver6565 said:

I think you’re both right, he’s in. Sad that’s it even remotely debatable though. 

I don’t think it is debatable.  You’re the first person I’ve ever seen suggest that he might not be a HOFer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/2/2024 at 3:33 AM, O's84 said:

He's already a HOF.  It's just that his injuries have killed his chances of being an Inner Circle HOF.

Just curious, where do you draw the “inner circle” line?  Opinions can vary about that.  I’d say Trout still has a decent shot at 100 rWAR, which in addition to being a beautiful round number, would put him in the top 22 position players of all time.  Is the inner circle tighter than that?

This may be a situation where WAR doesn’t define the inner circle.  He won’t get close to 3000 hits.  He’s maybe a 50/50 shot to teach 500 homers, and almost certainly won’t hit 600.   He’s never been on a WS team.  He’s had 100 RBI only 3 times.  So maybe 100 WAR isn’t enough for inner circle in his case?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jabba72 said:

With 86.3 career bWar, he looks like a near lock for the HOF. But his best days are far behind him. Will turn 33 on the IL. He's only played in 100+ games one season since 2019 and that was just 119. 

He's a lock.

He's been a lock.

Could retire today to follow his dream of being a meteorologist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

He's a lock.

He's been a lock.

Could retire today to follow his dream of being a meteorologist.

Except that he's got that massive extension until he's 38 to keep playing for. I dont think he'll be retiring anytime soon. He's still productive and likely will continue to be, but probably a good idea not to play him in CF anymore. It seems like none or at least very few of these 30 year+ extensions ever work out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jabba72 said:

With 86.3 career bWar, he looks like a near lock for the HOF. But his best days are far behind him. Will turn 33 on the IL. He's only played in 100+ games one season since 2019 and that was just 119. 

Looks like?  He was a lock 4 years ago.

At this point, he’s just adding to his legacy.

What it looks like is that he is heading on a path of being more Griffey Jr than Bonds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Hays, Mateo, Urias, and Holliday represent about 15% of our teams PA's (218 of 1514) and have 12 walks combined. Their combined OBP is like 23% or something like that. It wouldn't be a stretch to say only Holliday is really going to be a future fixture of the team and he will/should be a very good OBP player.
    • Both taken out of the game under somewhat odd circumstances. Hays pinch run for by Stowers,  after pinch hitting for Cedric and getting a double.     Santander was taken out for defense in the 9th and replaced by O'Hearn.   In the previous inning Santander had doubled and was out at the plate on a head first slide on McCann's squeeze attempt. Neither of these moves makes sense from a tactical point of view.    Stowers isn't faster than Hays nor would he be a better CF.   O'Hearn isn't better defensively than Santander.   So I have to assume Hays and Santander are both nicked up one way or the other, leading to their removal.   Bears watching as we head into the weekend.   If it's just minor, we have an off day tomorrow.  But I found it odd that with Mullins' slump, Hays didn't start the game today vs a lefty.
    • I have to admit, that was pretty hilarious.  But as fans, we’ve all been there.  I feel sorry for those two die-hards.
    • Perhaps not planning to start either one of them in this series and thinking that they prefer Hays to McKenna as a PH? This could explain the timing of Stowers over Kjerstad. Since Stowers is a better defensive option while they are hesitating to put Hays out there.
    • Both of them come across as being very arrogant know-it-all types. But I’m sorry give me Nestor over La Canfora any day! At least Nestor doesn’t consistently make stuff up and then try to pretend that it’s some kind of “insider” reporting.
    • Alright fair. I think if you're the FO you have to second guess this approach because it's not working for your hitters. Everyone is flailing at garbage and popping stuff up. I don't really understand the benefit of being over-aggressive. Let's take this series where it's plain to see that Toronto has good starting pitching and a bad bullpen. But due to your aggressiveness, you don't chase the SP, and therefore you're stuck facing Toronto's only two good relievers in Romano and Yimi - in both games due to the rainout.  So that's a bad approach mixed with bad advance scouting. They picked the most difficult way to try and beat this Jays team.
    • Come on, fellas.  It's just Dundalk Jay, man.  He's just trollin the airwaves a little... lol.  Tryin' to get some O's talk goin'.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...