Jump to content

Kevin Gausman believes the curve is his third pitch


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Man, Gausman's post game comments are night and day different than Mike Wright. When Wright does poorly, he'll blame his own defense or throw shade on some of the best hitters in the game. When Gausman does poorly?

“I think just falling apart, not being able to throw my secondary pitches for strikes,” Gausman said. “They came out looking for a fastball and I thought today was one of the best command days I’ve had with my fastball, but when you have to rely on that you’re just kind of putting yourself in bad situations.”

Pointing out his command was good of his fastball, but guys just sitting on it because he isn't throwing his secondary pitches well.

“It’s frustrating,” Gausman said. “I’m kind of in a little funk right now. Feel like I’m throwing the ball well, but a couple pitches here and there. Make quality pitches, hang a breaking ball when you can’t do that.

“Hanley Ramirez is a pretty good hitter. He put a good swing on it. It’s very frustrating. But I try to go back to the drawing board and take a couple good things from it. Good fastball command, but other than that, I just wasn’t very good today.

Tipping the cap to Hanley at the same time pointing out he hung one.

“Especially with after the way (Chris) Tillman pitched last night, I was really excited. Wanted to be the stopper again today. Didn’t do it. In a game where, against a team that’s really good, and obviously a series that means a lot right now, I wanted to come out and kind of hit the ground running and pitch well and I just didn’t do that.”

Love Gausman's attitude. Night and day different than Wright's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 505
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Pointing out his command was good of his fastball, but guys just sitting on it because he isn't throwing his secondary pitches well.

He's totally right on that. In the first two innings, you could tell his fastball was on. But then the Red Sox realized that he was having trouble getting anything else over effectively. That bouncer that could have been a double play if he fielded it cleanly or just let it go was huge, but he definitely did not have it tonight. When they started sitting on the fastball and he hung a few sliders, it was going to be a short night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect that he just had a bad game ....... combine that with the fact that the Red Sox are a stubborn offense in the first place (even when a pitcher is on his game), and you get what you got tonight.

Also, he missed a potential DP ball and/or easy out at home plate in the 3rd inning because he failed to field the ball cleanly when it came to him. That could have made the 3rd inning considerably less disastrous than it was if he had fielded it cleanly.

No matter, though. Even if he had made that play in the 3rd inning, he didn't seem to have his best stuff tonight. On to the next game for the Orioles, and on to his next start for Gausman.

I also suspect that it was just one of those days. He should be OK next game that he starts.

Not ready to send him to the bullpen quite yet. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I'm more concerned: The complete reliance on the fastball really does make one wonder about the progress he's made.

But, on the plus side, just like in the Toronto and Yankee games last week we were down early in (7-1 and 7-0, ultimately losing 10-9 and 8-6 respectively), the O's made a great comeback effort. The offense is very resilient. If the pitching rotation could just go to the next level, we should be contending for a post-season spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe if he learns how to pitch and develops a decent 3rd pitch, he'll earn his pay in the rotation.

We've been hearing this since he was drafted. I really don't know if he'll ever throw a decent breaking ball on a consistent basis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, Gausman's post game comments are night and day different than Mike Wright. When Wright does poorly, he'll blame his own defense or throw shade on some of the best hitters in the game. When Gausman does poorly?

Pointing out his command was good of his fastball, but guys just sitting on it because he isn't throwing his secondary pitches well.

Tipping the cap to Hanley at the same time pointing out he hung one.

Love Gausman's attitude. Night and day different than Wright's.

It'll be "fun" to compare him to EdRod tonight - command, secondaries, poise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really dislike Wright and have no interest in him being an Oriole for that reason.

Understandable, but that kind of attitude isn't indicative of being unsuccessful at this level. Clemens was pretty famous for never putting the blame on himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really dislike Wright and have no interest in him being an Oriole for that reason.

I don't have a huge problem with him, other than the fact that he's not that good a pitcher. He has said a few things that kind of rubbed me the wrong way, but basically, I just want him to pitch better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have a huge problem with him, other than the fact that he's not that good a pitcher. He has said a few things that kind of rubbed me the wrong way, but basically, I just want him to pitch better.

And while it's great to graciously accept failure with responsibility, the same can be said about Gausman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wright is wrapped a little too tight. If he can grow up, and mature a little bit, he's got the talent to be a stud. He's another guy they should exercise patience with. He's got ML options, so if he pitches poorly, they can ship him down.

Gausman will be fine, IMO. Just let him keep pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, Gausman's post game comments are night and day different than Mike Wright. When Wright does poorly, he'll blame his own defense or throw shade on some of the best hitters in the game. When Gausman does poorly?

Pointing out his command was good of his fastball, but guys just sitting on it because he isn't throwing his secondary pitches well.

Tipping the cap to Hanley at the same time pointing out he hung one.

Love Gausman's attitude. Night and day different than Wright's.

He sounds like he is putting too much pressure on himself as Buck seemed to convey after the game that he was too keyed up and over throwing at the expense of command. Buck differed with Gausman in that he said his fastball command was inconsistent as he left too many in the middle of the plate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gausman needs to go at least 6 and keep the rotation steady.

We definitely need that. We'll see what happens. KG has had awful run support and should have a winning record right now. Not that starter wins matter much. But he has pitched much better than his record this year. He'll be ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We definitely need that. We'll see what happens. KG has had awful run support and should have a winning record right now. Not that starter wins matter much. But he has pitched much better than his record this year. He'll be ok.

At home that may be so but he isn't good on the road so even though he is overdue for a decent road start and needs a bounce back from his last terrible start also on the road, I don't share your optimism. I just hope he can go 5 without giving up 5 runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At home that may be so but he isn't good on the road so even though he is overdue for a decent road start and needs a bounce back from his last terrible start also on the road, I don't share your optimism. I just hope he can go 5 without giving up 5 runs.

Home/Road, I really don't think it means much. It's another game, pitch or die.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yeah, I admit I got baited by the thread title a bit and popped off before actually listening to the thing.  It doesn't really change that I've always been concerned about Cal being part of the ownership group, but I was definitely hasty to be like "SEE??". Anyway, I've got my eye on Cal. The guy just rubs me the wrong way. But hopefully nothing much to see here, or in the future. 
    • Meanwhile, I have a question about Mayo’s defense.  Everybody implies that it’s dreadful. I guess I can understand that he’s not Manny or Brooks, but how bad is it? Are we hoping he’s at least as good as George Brett, about whom someone once said,(paraphrasing), “his defense is so bad it’s like he carries his bat to the base instead of his glove.“? I love defense, and I see absolutely no reason to move Westburg away. if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. It seems far more advisable to plunk Mayo at first and do something with the guys we currently have there?  
    • I think the thread title was misleading.  Not necessarily intentionally.  But if you just  see that without reading everything that was said and considering the context, it would be concerning.  
    • You know, for $24 a year, a measly lousy 24 bucks a year, you can edit your comment. And you can also support @Tony-OHwho has done more work online to create an Orioles environment than literally anybody else in the entire Internet universe.
    • I think there see plenty of guys who will stay with a contending team they like if the money is close.   But Burnes clearly intends to test the market.   No significant home team discount is coming, and it just takes one team to offer something crazy to knock us out of the picture unless we’re just being stupid. 
    • When Mateo is hitting well, he really makes you wonder why he can’t do it all the time.   He looks really balanced at the plate, he uses all fields, etc.  He doesn’t look like a bad hitter who happens to be on a heater.   But that’s what his track record shows he is, until proven otherwise.  I remember that Fangraphs article last year about how Mateo had changed his approach and the improvement seemed real.  Well, no it wasn’t.  But maybe his issues are more psychological than physical?   He’s just a guy who when he slumps, quickly loses confidence and starts pressing and makes it worse?   I don’t know.    As to your point about OBP: in 2024, a .299 OBP is below average but I might not say it blows.  The MLB average is back down to .312 after a spike last year after the rule changes.  Of 312 players with 80+ PA, Mateo’s .299 ranks 191st, or 39th percentile.   Honestly, in this environment, if Mateo could stay at .299 OBP he’d be a very credible player.   But he’s a .272 career OPS guy who’d been at .267 the last two years, so I’m not expecting he’ll be able to stay at .299.   I’ll enjoy it while he’s hot though.   And he is playing a mean 2B.   Took him a couple of weeks to settle in there, but he’s looked great for the last month.    
    • I broached the experiment of Holliday in CF some months ago.  It seems to be something that could make sense.  I still expect he'll be our 2B moving forward, but having such versatility is never a bad thing.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...