Jump to content

Jorge Lopez traded to Twins for pitching prospects (edit)


interloper

Recommended Posts

Just now, luismatos4prez said:

This is a Bundy-style quantity over quality trade. Unexciting, I thought we'd get more for a controllable all-star closer.

At first glance, Povich seems like a Drew Rom level prospect. The two young guys, Nunez and Rojas, have great numbers but are very young and far away. Cano seems like a waiver wire type pickup. 

Nunez isn’t young. A 21 year old in the complex league is more likely than not a “never will be” org player.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I'll wait to hear what experts have to say, but it does seem like more of a grab bag type deal for Lopez hoping one or two of the players become productive MLB players. 

I'm sure Mike and the gang think they see something here, but I would have preferred at least one obvious high-end prospect for multiple years of an AS closer. These guys all seem like projects, but then again, I don't get paid to evaluate professional baseball players so... :noidea:

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, seak05 said:

I am irate at this deal. The Mancini deal made sense. The Orioles aren't even getting back any top prospects in this one, it makes zero sense for this year, next year, or 2024. Do any of these guys even crack the O's top 30? 

I'm surprised by your reaction.  Do you know anything about the 2 pitching prospects in the FCL?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sports Guy said:

He has likely been trying to trade Lopez for weeks.  I doubt all of a sudden huge deals would be coming in.  If he could have gotten more, he would have.  He’s not punting on getting better talent so he can go out to lunch.

You clearly have followed baseball for years, so you know full well that trade deadlines always have last minute deals, and other trades can change the equation for what teams need and make available to trade. The Orioles agreed to this trade several hours before the deadline. 

I don't disagree that Elias has been checking on deals for Lopez for weeks. However, I completely disagree with you that other deals couldn't have come in. And no, I'm not expecting a "huge deal". But it's perfectly reasonable to expect other options and teams to negotiate with to manifest prior to the deadline. That's how lots of deals have gotten done in the past.

Not going to further waste my time arguing this, since you clearly enjoy confrontation and have a history of focusing on hypothetical points in order to do so. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

This is a decent trade Povich is a fast riser and even though he ranked a little lower in preseason rankings.  I expect he would have been much higher up that list 4/1 strikeout to walk rate in first season of professional ball is impressive.

He is fine as a piece of a trade return, but based solely on pedigree, age, and stat lines it is tough to see Cano and Nunez as anything other than throw-ins and Rojas as anything other than a lottery ticket.

That just isn't close to enough for 2 and a third years of a guy who has looked like a dominant reliever since moving to the bullpen and has a sub-2 ERA this year with peripherals to support that ERA.

Edited by MurphDogg
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe wait an hour to see before passing judgement on guys none of us have heard of prior to today?

The Twins Daily write up sounds pretty good considering. #10 prospect +?

Also worth noting if everyone on here is talking about SSS and selling high that the professionals know that too.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sydnor said:

Nunez isn’t young. A 21 year old in the complex league is more likely than not a “never will be” org player.

It's not the same with pitchers.  Felix Bautisa was still in the DSL at age 22 (according to Melewski.  I didn't fact check).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pdiddy said:

Maybe wait an hour to see before passing judgement on guys none of us have heard of prior to today?

The Twins Daily write up sounds pretty good considering. #10 prospect +?

Also worth noting if everyone on here is talking about SSS and selling high that the professionals know that too.

#10 ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

He is fine as a piece of a trade return, but based solely on pedigree, age, and stat lines it is tough to see Cano and Nunez as anything other than throw-ins and Rojas as anything other than a lottery ticket.

That just isn't close to enough for 2 and a third years of a guy who has looked like a dominant reliever since moving to the bullpen and has a sub-2 ERA this year with peripherals to support that ERA.

Do we have any scouting reports on the two FCL pitchers?    Without knowing more about them it's premature to pass judgement on the deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, interloper said:

He doesn't have to be in that league with the Orioles. Maybe they throw him right into A ball. 

Perhaps. It doesn’t change my assessment. If the Twins thought he was good, he wouldn’t be in the complex league. I think that the organization decided they didn’t want to pay Lopez what he was going to make in Arb 2. This is what they got for him. I don’t like it, and I’m not going to try to talk myself into it.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • But that is not what you said. You said he’s a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier. Thus, you were stating he is close to as bad a fielder as Trumbo was, which is not correct. Generally speaking, no player makes up the loss of offensive value with defensive value as the age. It is usually one of the first things to go. I was not making any sort of argument that he was going to make up declining offense with defense, just pointing out that you made a preposterous statement.
    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
    • It's not the money, it's the years.  I wouldn't mind signing him for a year or two, even at what I'd consider to be stupid money.  But what I DON'T agree with is signing him for any more than 2-3 years as I don't think he's going to age well.  And I expect him to get more than 3 years from someone, so I'm a hard pass.  Can we afford him?  Money wise, sure.  But I don't want to see us stuck with him 4-5 years down the road when his skillset has greatly diminished, but he's still playing every day because we owe him a lot of money and a lot of loyalty.  Let some other club take that risk, get the QO pick and move on.  
    • Santander does exactly ONE thing very well: Hit HRs He doesn't hit for average, he doesn't get on base, he's a very slow runner, and he is a very poor defender. If he stops hitting HRs so often, his value completely evaporates and his contract basically becomes dead money, and the Orioles cannot afford to eat large amounts of dead money like the Dodgers, Mets, and Yankees of the world. I am simply using Trumbo, whose basic tool kit is very similar to Santander's, as a fairly recent, Orioles-related cautionary tale. Trumbo had his big walk year with the Orioles at age 30 and instead of doing the smart, obvious thing and taking the free draft pick, we gave him a big money extension that everyone except the FO knew was probably going to end poorly. Baseball Savant has Santander in the 22nd percentile in terms of overall fielding value. However you want to slice it, he isn't going to make up any lost value from declining offense with his defense. If his ability to slug goes south, the whole contract goes with it, because he has no other tools to make up for that with.
    • Santander is -2 OAA this year. He’s averagish to below average. There but there are much worse defensive right fielders such as Adolis Garcia and Castellanos -9, Lane Thomas and Renfroe -8, and Soto -4. Acuna and Tatis are also -2 OAA.  In 2016, Mark Trumbo was -15 OAA. They’re not even in the same universe.
    • Anthony Santander (age 27-29): .245 / .317 / .477 / .794    124 OPS+   9.0 rWAR Mark Trumbo (age 27-29): .244 / .299 / .443 / .742   105 OPS+  2.6 rWAR Is it really very meaningful that Trumbo was the better player when they were significantly younger? 29-year-old Santander is a better player by miles than Trumbo at the same age, and he has been for years. I think that’s what matters most to how you’d project them over the next few years.
    • I love Tony and I honestly think we are gonna miss his veteran leadership as much as anything. I’m very happy we have him for this year. But I do think he’d be a bad long term investment. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...