Jump to content

Orioles acquire catcher, DFA Krehbiel


Legend_Of_Joey

Recommended Posts

Sooo, tin foil hat-conspiracy theory time. ME has Stowers and Vavra up, Hyde plays Vavra AND Frazier in starts that should have gone to Stowers. So, ME sends Stowers down to get regular ABs. Vavra isn't producing, Stowers gets hot, ME sends Vavra down and promotes Stowers. Now Mav gets hurt and Hyde wants a 3rd catcher cutting ABs from Stowers and O'Hearn. Stowers gets a start in LF where he has limited experience rather than RF where he is a better option than Santander defensively. Hays (hot bat) sits while Santander (cold bat, poor defense) plays. Ergo: Hyde hates Stowers and is hoping for a DJS performance to cement his opinion. I am only half kidding!!!

Edited by AnythingO's
typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cannot stand how Elias and Hyde handle to major league roster. This makes as much sense as signing Frazier, trading for Aguliar and Phillips, and playing Odor everyday. Can't wait for the punt lineups against lefties that run out McCan, Mckenna, and this guy. 

 

Stop obsessing over splits especially at small sample sizes. If you want a righty DH, then put Santander there and play Stowers. While you are at it, ditch Mckenna and bring up Cowser

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Orioles0615 said:

I cannot stand how Elias and Hyde handle to major league roster. This makes as much sense as signing Frazier, trading for Aguliar and Phillips, and playing Odor everyday. Can't wait for the punt lineups against lefties that run out McCan, Mckenna, and this guy. 

 

Stop obsessing over splits especially at small sample sizes. If you want a righty DH, then put Santander there and play Stowers. While you are at it, ditch Mckenna and bring up Cowser

 

audience-clapping.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, maybenxtyr said:

It's amazing the record that this team has. The roster usage is weird at best.

Maybe the professional scouts and people running the player personnel for the team know more then a bunch of fans that don’t watch players of other teams often.  You can find thread after thread about people complaining about adding this guy or that guy but most the time they have been right.  Most people wanted Mateo released, didn’t like the decision to bring up Cano, said Gibson was worse the Lyles, wondered why they protected Bautista just as a few examples.  

  • Upvote 3
  • Confused 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

Maybe the professional scouts and people running the player personnel for the team know more then a bunch of fans that don’t watch players of other teams often.  You can find thread after thread about people complaining about adding this guy or that guy but most the time they have been right.  Most people wanted Mateo released, didn’t like the decision to bring up Cano, said Gibson was worse the Lyles, wondered why they protected Bautista just as a few examples.  

Ok.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems a little strange, at this moment anyway. I’m trying not to overthink this. My first thought is that O’Hearn should go down, not that he has been bad at all. His profile doesn’t fit that well if Adley and McCann are going to DH often between catching games. I would think Stowers stays and provides a LH bat with solid defense in the OF corners.

The question for me then is how many at bats will Stowers get while they are trying to get Santander on track? I watched Hyde talk about Santander’s 16 pitch at bat last night, and how he lamented that Santander is “really grinding right now.” They could keep O’Hearn as a bench role LH bat, and Frazier can play OF corners moreso than O’Hearn. IDK.

I doubt Torrens is staying long term. Probably a guy they evaluate over a week or two and see what they have in him. See what his aptitude is and what they can fix. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

Maybe the professional scouts and people running the player personnel for the team know more then a bunch of fans that don’t watch players of other teams often.  You can find thread after thread about people complaining about adding this guy or that guy but most the time they have been right.  Most people wanted Mateo released, didn’t like the decision to bring up Cano, said Gibson was worse the Lyles, wondered why they protected Bautista just as a few examples.  

I appreciate the lecture. I don't believe I was doubting them, just don't understand carrying 3 catchers on the ML roster. Most likely he's only on the 26 for a brief moment... still, just a weird use of 1 of 26.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

With Handley being hurt, this moves keeps them from needing to also pull Bemboom for the taxi squad and really deplete Norfolk.

But he's not on the taxi squad, he's in the 26 man. So...who gets sent down and who will join the taxi squad?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

I suspect this three-catcher situation will end quickly, similar to the last instance. 

If it doesn't, we may see some of that McCann at 1b alignment that was foreshadowed in the spring?

Most likely, especially if Ryan O'hearn doesn't pick things up tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Roll Tide said:

Can someone verify this?

I doubt that's real. I haven't heard anything about it, and he's under team control for 5 more years. Something about that topic would not be this quiet of a story. And there's no way they are going to replace a burgeoning Franchise Star who has 5 years of team control with some random backup catcher they acquired for depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

But he's not on the taxi squad, he's in the 26 man. So...who gets sent down and who will join the taxi squad?

No one will join the taxi squad, as it is not a mandatory thing this season.

As far as who gets sent down? No idea. Could be an IL stint as well too for some one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • 1) I don't think it's a bad idea to consider moving on from non-productive vets like Hays and possibly Mullins as well. 2) I'm almost starting to move toward the opinion of re-signing Santander. He is likely not to require a major financial commitment (3/4 years at modest money). And I believe because most of his contributions come from counting stats (homers and RBIs) he is likely to be undervalued in this era of statcast baseball. 3) Elias has never (IMO for good reason) decided to take the approach of multiple/several first timers learning on the job at all at once. The potential for that to go sideways represents too much risk, when you are trying to win a World Series. 4) You didn't just mention moving on from Mullins and Hays. But you also mentioned Santander, O'Hearn, and Mountcastle. That is FIVE regulars and replacing them all with players who have never proven that they can hit Major League pitching. I would almost bet that there aren't 5 first timers in all of MLB who are succeeding this season on their first try. Now obviously, for Holliday next season will be his second try. And I guess 3rd for Stowers, maybe 4th depending how you look at it. And second/third for Kjerstad, Norby (I guess second). Though some of these guys stints were so short, I don't know if they could even get/make much of it some of those previous times. 5) If we make it to the postseason (which we are almost assured to do) win or lose this year in the Fall, it will be a very poor message to send to the fanbase to not spend/add in the offseason. With a payroll this low (ranked what 25th?) you should not be cutting cost and especially with a multi-billionaire owner. 6) If you don't trade any of these players this season, how do you propose that we get better/get the piece(s) that we need? 7) Even with all of these new young players and even if all of them performed right away, where is the pitching going to come from next season in order to legitimately contend (if you don't spend in the offseason)?
    • Nobody thought Toronto would not cash in on their "window". It slammed shut on them and they had a lot of young talent that regressed pretty hard. Cautionary tales are out there.
    • What an odd question. Of course it’s important. The entire baseball world will be paying attention to this series. The two best teams in all baseball, in the same division, each going for a crown at the expense of the other, and neither a big fan of the other. Wins are important regardless of the opponent, but it also goes without saying that we would rather win three out of four against the Yankees, than three out of four against the Athletics, or even other contenders like the Mariners or Guards.  
    • Yeah, too much young talent for that to happen next year, unless some major regression and injuries happen.
    • Mike Elias' job certainly entails doing due diligence on Jack Flaherty again.  
    • even if they do, so what? 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...