Jump to content

Dylan Cease


E-D-D-I-E

Recommended Posts

Luis Robert scares me.  Yes, he could be great.  He’s only 26 and had a big year offensively and defensively.   His statcast numbers are great and terrible.  I was surprised to see his average exit velocity as low as it was.  His chase and whiff percentages are very poor.  The 2023 season was his career season to this point.  In his career season he walked 30 times and struck out 172 times.  They say defense peaks early.  Robert is a big guy.  Did he just have a career year defensively as well?  This definitely looks like buying at peak value.

On the other hand, his contract isn’t going to kill you and he could be a bargain.   I’ll cop out and say it depends on the package but I certainly am not hot to get Robert.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Luis Robert scares me.  Yes, he could be great.  He’s only 26 and had a big year offensively and defensively.   His statcast numbers are great and terrible.  I was surprised to see his average exit velocity as low as it was.  His chase and whiff percentages are very poor.  The 2023 season was his career season to this point.  In his career season he walked 30 times and struck out 172 times.  They say defense peaks early.  Robert is a big guy.  Did he just have a career year defensively as well?  This definitely looks like buying at peak value.

On the other hand, his contract isn’t going to kill you and he could be a bargain.   I’ll cop out and say it depends on the package but I certainly am not hot to get Robert.

Agreed. I don’t see why we should buy high on Robert. He had a career year last year. He usually doesn’t stay healthy. He makes horrible swing decisions. And strikes out a lot. The contract would be a reason to trade for him, but I think he’ll cost more than I’m comfortable trading. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering they’re only likely to go in on one SP with a guaranteed spot in the rotation…I’d hate to think Cease would be the guy. He’s gonna have a high cost and to be honest, I’d rather keep Cowser or Kjerstad or whoever it takes to get him.

If they can swing something like a trade involving Norby and Beavers then sure…but I don’t wanna see the top guys go for a couple years of an okay starting pitcher. Aim higher if that’s the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I preferred a cheap model at the time.

But hating on the Zune had nothing to do with how it functioned. 

I've heard that you can buy a "vintage" iPod from Urban Outfitters now for like $300+. The weird part is, you can get them from eBay for next to nothing. I've never owned an Apple product myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, maybenxtyr said:

I've heard that you can buy a "vintage" iPod from Urban Outfitters now for like $300+. The weird part is, you can get them from eBay for next to nothing. I've never owned an Apple product myself.

I just checked and back in 2007 Urban Outfitters had an exclusive Zune they sold.  😆

To some degree Apple is a lifestyle brand.

Edited by Can_of_corn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, maybenxtyr said:

I've heard that you can buy a "vintage" iPod from Urban Outfitters now for like $300+. The weird part is, you can get them from eBay for next to nothing. I've never owned an Apple product myself.

I've got to find some out-of-date product and figure out a way to get hipsters to want to buy it.

https://www.businessinsider.com/vintage-ipod-sold-out-urban-outfitters-2023-10

Quote

That specific iPod model was initially launched by Apple in 2007 and retailed for about $249 at the time. More than 15 years later, it was priced at $349 on Urban Outfitters, according to Fast Company.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

2022 is what drives his value. If you take that year away, you don’t consider giving up Cowser and may not even give up a top 100 type guy.

But 2022 did happen and it shows his potential, so it makes him intriguing.

So with that said, what was the difference between 2022 and 2023? A quick look at Baseball Savant #s might shed a little light. Here are a few things I see:

1) His curveball usage was up only slightly in 2023 (15.2%-13.9%) but he threw it much more to RHB in 2023 (211-159) and he got crushed for it. BA was up (.298-.253), HR were up (4-1), SLG was up (.538-.391) year over year.  So maybe throw the curveball less? Fix the shape of the CB? Don't throw it to RHBs?

2) 4SFB usage was up in 2023 (43.2%-39.8%). Average velocity was down (95.6 - 96.8) While the HRs were the same (8), he gave up more hits (75-54), higher BA (.273-.240), higher SLG (.436-.391), higher exit velocity (90.3-88.4) and lower whiff% (20.5-23.2). So maybe throw fewer 4SFB? Throw them higher in the zone?

3) The 2022 SL was a completely different pitch than the 2023 version. He threw it more (42.9%-38.6%), it was over 1 mph harder (87.4 -86.3), and it spun more (2833 - 2795). It was also more effective, BA (.128-.216), SLG (.209-.339) and Exit veto (83.8-88.9) all favor the 2022 version. Ironically the HR allowed (7) and whiff% (43.3) were identical.  So maybe throw the SL more. Go back and look at 2022 film to see if he can recapture the better mechanics of 2022 to regain velocity and spin.

Finally, he rarely throws a CH (3%) but it's an effective pitch. In fact, (SSS alert!) the 2023 version was very effective, BA (.111), SLG (.111) EV ( 77 mph). Maybe throw the CH more? Throw it instead of the CB to RHB?

Additionally, he did very rarely throw a sinker in 2022. So he can throw it. We know that Bradish made a transition away from the 4SFB to the sinker and found impressive results. Does a sinker give him another pitch to RH batters? Does it make his SL to RHB even more effective? If he uses the CH more and the CB less can a sinker be an effective 4th pitch?

Is he "fixable?" Your guess is as good as mine. I do think he's an attractive piece to get back in a trade but it's going to matter what the prospect cost would be. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, HakunaSakata said:

Cease makes sense if they believe his 2022 season was an outlier, but why would the White Sox trade Robert (one of their few young cornerstones)?

Well the deal is a haul and fixes a number of holes. Honestly, if I’m the Orioles I’d keep Kremer and offer the 2 minor league guys. That gives them 2 future starter candidates. However, looking at their top 30 prospects 10 out of 15 are pitchers. So they may value position prospects higher. They have Tatum at AA that’s a good CF prospect and he swiped 47 bases. So maybe they’d be happy with a that deal or a deal that has more prospects and forget guys like Mountcastle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When evaluating a trade for Dylan Cease you have to ask yourself which Cease am I getting? The guy from 2021? 22? or 23? While he shared some vary good common denominators in each of the last 3 seasons (at least 32 starts, at least 165 innings pitched, and over 200 strikeouts in each of those years) some of the other results were vastly different. Is he the Cy Young pitcher that he was 2 seasons ago or the very mediocre pitcher that he was this year? Or somewhere in between like he was in 2021? Also the walk rate was a little high in each of the last 3 years, but is trending down in the right direction.

I'm confident that pitching in the new cavernous Camden Yards for half of his starts would be a boast and being able to play behind a better infield defense would probably aid him too. But by how much? ... I guess that it is something that Elias would need to assess when trying to figure out his value?

Early in the season I was very much on-board that "add Dylan Cease by trade train" not I am sort of indifferent. He would obviously be an upgrade for our rotation and give us more "dependability". But I really don't care if we add via trade or FA or (hopefully both), I just want the org to add talent so that we can have a better shot to stand tall next Fall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/3/2023 at 4:08 PM, Roll Tide said:

I’d offer one of Cowser/Ortiz/Norby and Stowers.

A guy who won a Cy Young in the last two years for 1 possible legit prospect and a throw-in (I highly doubt the White Sox would be clamoring for the likes of Stowers... but who knows?) Either way, that seems like a very low ball offer if I'm looking at things from a CHI SOX perspective. If the rumors are true that they asked for Holliday at the deadline, that would be an awfully steep fall to end up with the package that you are suggesting. At this point can Joey Ortiz even highlight a trade? He's already 25 has not Major success/track record AND I believe the entire industry is going to start adjusting the evaluation of many of our positional prospects' offensive numbers (especially at AAA) given how little of it we saw carry over to the Big club. Westburg went from leading his league with 17 homers before the end of June and hit all of TWO for us the second half of the season. Stowers didn't even look competitive at the plate in his brief stint in the Majors this year after killing it in the Minors. I think we at least have to consider that other teams will have some apprehension about offensive carry over and may not be comfortable "settling" for one or two prospects given what we have seen?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, waroriole said:

Agreed. I don’t see why we should buy high on Robert. He had a career year last year. He usually doesn’t stay healthy. He makes horrible swing decisions. And strikes out a lot. The contract would be a reason to trade for him, but I think he’ll cost more than I’m comfortable trading. 

At some point, we are going to need to take some big swings. This ownership isn’t going to take big swings with money. Hell, we don’t even know if they will extend our own guys.

Robert is a risk, no doubt..as is any acquisition or any non acquisition always is.

But he is an elite talent that is a good age and has a great contract..and he can play a premium position at a high level.

He’s definitely not a slam dunk but there are a lot of reasons why he’s a very good risk for this org to take.

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I'm not sure how they get there, but I believe that this is a better team with Westburg at 3B and ideally Holliday at 2B rather than Mayo at 3B and Westburg at 2B.   Actually, any combo will be better with Westburg at third.
    • I’ll be happy to eat my words if a list comes out with us having 3 in the top 5.  I’d bet strongly against it.   
    • Guys like Wynns who’ve had some major league experience make decent money even when in the minors.  Still, it must be disappointing to be hopping from team to team and getting a few major league games here and there but not really sticking.  Not an easy life.  
    • Nope.  Believe it or not I would be much happier to have the Os win the WS and I never bet them at all than for me to have bet them to win the division for example, they do so, and not get out of round 1 of the playoffs.  Sure I make money.  But so what? Money is just money.  Winning a WS is pure joy.   I just made the point about me betting to show that I am not afraid to be critical and a realist even though I did put my money where my mouth is. 
    • Show me an objective source that has reranked the prospects since their initial lists?  The draft is July 16th.  Usually they do a reranking a few weeks after that.  We could have 3 in the top 5.  We have 3 in the top 18 currently.  It's not so far fetched.  
    • Most players in the NFL and NBA are elite/explosive athletes just look at their measurables/testing numbers. As a matter of fact, when someone succeeds in the NBA in particular without being one it is an outlier (Luka Doncic). In football even the non-uber athletes (Offensive guards, defensive tackles, most tight ends are still fantastic athletes) Ever seen Aaron Donald up close Justin Madubuike? However, baseball is a different game. Some baseball players are elite athletes. But many are not as it is not a requirement to be great at the sport, since it is mostly a hand-eye coordination sport. Deion Sanders was a great athlete and an okay baseball player. Michael Jordan sucked at baseball. But again, I have to assume that you know this and are just typing words for the sake of it. Do you think Tony Gwynn could beat any of those people in any kind of athletic contest? But yet he was miles and away a better baseball player.
    • That's a point I was trying to make earlier in the season, but you did a much better job than I. Holliday could turn out to be a great player, but still not be anywhere near what Henderson is. Once he gets his chance again hopefully he's ready because those 2 together would make an excellent combo.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...