Jump to content

Now, I want you to remember....


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Morgan423 said:

I'm honestly kind of amazed at the continued Adam Frazier talk... 

He was the exact template of the One Season Placeholder Player™:  Filling in for a single year until another player (usually a AAA future-starter-guy wrapping up his minor league development) is ready to go the next season.  He's hired in the hope that he be league-averagey (or hopefully a little better) during his sole season with the team... he often falls short, though sometimes he kind of makes it.  Afterward, the transaction is complete. He signs with another team, and we never see him again outside the handful of times a year we play his new team.  

I'm not sure why the fascination endures.  We have at least one of these guys on the roster every single season, including this one (I'm looking at you, Craig Kimbrel).  He should be a wispy ghost of a memory now, yet we'll still be talking about him off and on for years to come.   🤷‍♂️

Well Frazier blocked two mlb ready players is a big reason for the dislike.

Once he showed his range was horrible, he probably should have lost a lot more PT. Westburg looked amazing at 2B in comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’m very happy to have the extra year of Westburg in 2029 in exchange for the time he missed in 2023 due to Frazier being on the team.  

Could Westburg win ROY this year and get us a pick while still keeping the extra year of service time? From the things I’ve read, they get a full year of service time the year they win the award, but Westburg would be getting a full year of service time this year anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RarityFlaherty said:

Could Westburg win ROY this year and get us a pick while still keeping the extra year of service time? From the things I’ve read, they get a full year of service time the year they win the award, but Westburg would be getting a full year of service time this year anyway. 

No.  Westburg has exceeded rookie limits.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RarityFlaherty said:

Could Westburg win ROY this year and get us a pick while still keeping the extra year of service time? From the things I’ve read, they get a full year of service time the year they win the award, but Westburg would be getting a full year of service time this year anyway. 

Yes the extra year of service is already baked in because he didn't play a full season last year.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Frobby said:

No.  Westburg has exceeded rookie limits.   

https://birdswatcher.com/posts/could-jordan-westburg-be-an-early-2024-rookie-of-the-year-frontrunner-01h9ya15aexn

oh this article from September seems to think he still has eligibility. 
 

I just looked it up and you are right. He’s over the AB limit. When I saw that article I thought maybe we found a loophole. 

Edited by RarityFlaherty
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RarityFlaherty said:

https://birdswatcher.com/posts/could-jordan-westburg-be-an-early-2024-rookie-of-the-year-frontrunner-01h9ya15aexn

oh this article from September seems to think he still has eligibility. 

Wow, that’s just terribly sloppy by the author.  

To be eligible for Rookie of the Year, you have to go into the season with both (1) less than 45 days of service time and (2) fewer than 130 at bats.  Westburg had 98 days of service and 208 at bats.  He’s not even close to qualifying for rookie status.   

I guess I’ll never waste my time reading that website.

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Wow, that’s just terribly sloppy by the author.  

To be eligible for Rookie of the Year, you have to go into the season with both (1) less than 45 days of service time and (2) fewer than 130 at bats.  Westburg had 98 days of service and 208 at bats.  He’s not even close to qualifying for rookie status.   

I guess I’ll never waste my time reading that website.

 

I wonder how much this Joshua Davis is making per article. I’m sure most of you guys on here could do a much better job. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I didn't realize there was so much blowback with Frazier last year. I understand some of the vitriol, but I think he helped just enough to be that extra veteran gap filler last year and I'm glad the younger guys get more opportunities this season.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Tbone83 said:

I didn't and don't understand the Frazier hate here. Coming into last year I just saw him as a guy to hold things down till the younger guys came up, and to be decent. Was he an all star or a O'Hearn-like surprise? No, but I think he was fine, and had several huge clutch hits as well. Did he ever make me want to throw my remote through the TV like Baker? No. Was he Mateo-trying-to-bunt bad? Nah. If I have to look for negatives in an overwhelmingly positive season, I don't think AF would make my top 50.

Yeah, I disagreed with signing him as much as everyone else, but the vitriol directed at him seemed kind of over the top.   Almost Lew Ford / Colby Rasmus / Cito Gaston level hatred.

He would get a game winning hit and people would almost have to begrudgingly give him credit, sort of like "Well, at least Mussolini made the trains run on time".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Yeah, I disagreed with signing him as much as everyone else, but the vitriol directed at him seemed kind of over the top.   Almost Lew Ford / Colby Rasmus / Cito Gaston level hatred.

He would get a game winning hit and people would almost have to begrudgingly give him credit, sort of like "Well, at least Mussolini made the trains run on time".

Lew Ford hatred? That was a concoction of OH, wasn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frazier, Ford - cars aren't they? How many of you remember the Frazier? Frazier went bye bye but Ford is still around. And, I have absolutely no idea why I typed this other than Frazier and Ford in the same thread must have done something to what is left of my mind. Going to take a nap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I mean more notable for anything. It's been around 60 years and you don't even have a State Senator or CEO to crow about?
    • If Mayo and Holliday are here next year, one of them most certainly has to move to the OF. There is only one position available. Henderson, Westburg, and Mountcastle are all starting caliber INFs. For a team who is trying to win a WS (like I assume the goal will be again next season) I don't see the wisdom in introducing too much possible volatility at one time due to the variance in performance that young players (first time big leaguers can produce). To have a lineup where Holliday, Mayo, (Kjerstad and Norby for that matter) are all trying to acclimate/figuring out how to hit big league pitching all at the same time does not seem like a wise move and it definitely doesn't seem like something Elias would do. I'm not sure that I see this is a move that would be ultra-risky or a move that would be for a rebuilding team. We are obviously going to be in the postseason and we could go all the way. If we were to turn around after a successful season and then jettison all vets and go with a rebuild lineup with half or more being occupied with young players prospects, I think it would come with a lot of negative PR and most likely a negative fan reaction. Teams who are successful and have young stars/cornerstone players under multiple years of control/contract (Rutschman, Henderson) don't typically decide to rebuild/reset in the midst of that. That could be detrimental to the teams bottom line and that would be a hard sell to an owner who has just taken over the team.
    • Yes, Boras clients occasionally sign extensions.  No, Boras won’t prevent a client that wants to sign an extension from doing so.  Yes, Boras clients sign fewer pre-FA extensions than clients of other agencies (based on comparing his share of pre-FA extensions vs. his larger share of MLB players). That’s because of either the advice he gives, attracting clients with a similar philosophy, or both. Scott has never signed a player with less than two years of service time to a long-term extension.  He has only signed 1 pre-arb player to a long-term extension which was 13 years ago (Carlos Gonzalez). Expectations of signing Gunnar or Westburg to extensions need to be calibrated against this reality.  
    • A.J. Preller is apparently a good talent evaluator and an aggressive GM.   I get the feeling he thinks they can keep replacing prospects through the draft and J2 signings.   He’s kind of painted himself into a corner with the current team.  He traded for Arráez.   The Padres were already rumored to be interested in Crochet.  I wouldn’t put it past Heller.  Of course, Crochet isn’t a rental so it’s not quite selling your soul to the devil to trade an Ethan Salas for him.  Not sure what else they have to offer.
    • I didn't really know either until the news of his death, which was kind of a lightbulb moment for me in relation to the extreme all-in approach the Padres had been taking in recent years. The family has kept a lot of details private, but from reading a couple of the articles after he passed, he had already gone through a couple of different tough cancer fights and it was known around the industry that his health was tenuous. I don't know if he got a specific prognosis before the end, but it seems clear that he wasn't taking any time for granted and wanted to push to make things happen while he could. It's not really relevant for the O's, but it has come up now and then when some folks start asking why the O's couldn't try to spend like the Padres - it's clear now that the Padres were in a unique situation.
    • No, but my family should get a good dose.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...