Jump to content

Astros Home/Road splits


nevadaO

Recommended Posts

Houston is actually respectable at home sitting at 25-27. For a team that lost 106 games last season, that's not too bad.

However, on the road this year they are 11-45!! 11 and 45!! And that is after they won last night in Atlanta.

I'm sure someone can find out, but I wonder what the worst road record in history for a team was? 11-45 is miserable!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 1899 Cleveland Spiders went 11-101 on the road. They only played 42 home games all year. The fans just stopped showing up pretty early in the year, so they just stopped playing home games. Their opening day crowd of 15,000 was almost certainly more than 1/10th of their yearly total.

The 1890 Pittsburgh Alleghenys went 9-88 on the road.

Since 1901 the worst road record is by the '35 Boston Braves, who went 13-65.

The 1906 Cubs went 60-15 on the road. The '39 Browns went 18-59 at home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
    • This is exactly what EDC said tonight     
    • My guess is more of a safety profile than they preferred. They clearly wanted Wiggins. They ran that pick up fast. And then when you listen to the press conference, the love for the player was obvious.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...