Jump to content

Cast your 2014 Hall of Fame Ballot (Update: Maddux, Glavine, Thomas Elected)


Frobby

Cast your 2014 Hall of Fame Ballot  

586 members have voted

  1. 1. Cast your 2014 Hall of Fame Ballot


This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

Of Murray Chass who has publicly stated that he is only going to keep voting so he can:

So, with Gurnick and Chass, that is 2 that we know of right there. If their votes were not counted, Biggio would have had his 75% (427/569). I'm not huge on Biggio personally, but that there is a travesty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 178
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I was with you until this year, and then some of the idiot writers and what they did this year turned the tables for me on this subject.

Three players went in (as well as three managers). That's pretty good, in fact three ties for the most players being voted in by the BBWA in since four went in back in 1955. The crowded ballot brought down a few of the player's vote totals but the only lasting effects are: 1) Palmeiro was eliminated from future voting for falling under 5% (and he wasn't about to get in), and 2) Morris didn't get in on his 15th try, but he'll be eligible in 2016 through the Veteran's Committee. Everyone else of significance will be back next year. That's why they get 15 tries, you have lean years and fat years and this year was awfully crowded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Three players went in (as well as three managers). That's pretty good, in fact three ties for the most players being voted in by the BBWA in since four went in back in 1955. The crowded ballot brought down a few of the player's vote totals but the only lasting effects are: 1) Palmeiro was eliminated from future voting for falling under 5% (and he wasn't about to get in), and 2) Morris didn't get in on his 15th try, but he'll be eligible in 2016 through the Veteran's Committee. Everyone else of significance will be back next year. That's why they get 15 tries, you have lean years and fat years and this year was awfully crowded.

This just highlights the flaws in the voting process. I mean, Morris had 15 years of the guys they've assigned to vote to get in (and against a very weak peer group), he doesn't, and yet everyone is pretty sure he'll one day go in via some kind of Vet's Committee. While Raffy certainly should go in eventually, but, again, everyone was assuming he'd have to wait for the Vet's Committee, too.

Really, the difference between one borderline HOFer and another is very often when they hit the ballot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This just highlights the flaws in the voting process. I mean, Morris had 15 years of the guys they've assigned to vote to get in (and against a very weak peer group), he doesn't, and yet everyone is pretty sure he'll one day go in via some kind of Vet's Committee. While Raffy certainly should go in eventually, but, again, everyone was assuming he'd have to wait for the Vet's Committee, too.

Really, the difference between one borderline HOFer and another is very often when they hit the ballot.

And who they know on the Vet's Committee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This just highlights the flaws in the voting process. I mean, Morris had 15 years of the guys they've assigned to vote to get in (and against a very weak peer group), he doesn't, and yet everyone is pretty sure he'll one day go in via some kind of Vet's Committee. While Raffy certainly should go in eventually, but, again, everyone was assuming he'd have to wait for the Vet's Committee, too.

Really, the difference between one borderline HOFer and another is very often when they hit the ballot.

Well, you're certainly right that there are flaws - several in fact. But I think the system is working. Some guys just take a while. Now, maybe you think these are borderline players and the Hall should have a higher standard, but there are many players who took a while to get in. Many voters change their opinions on players over the years.

Jim Rice 15 years

Bert Blyleven 14 years

Bruce Sutter 13 years

Bob Lemon 12 years

Duke Snider 11 years

Don Drysdale 10 years

Goose Gossage 9 years

Writers don't always get it correct right away. The first year of voting (1926) saw Connie Mack, who I think almost everyone would agree is a HOFer, get exactly one vote from the BBWA....one vote. Charlie Gehringer didn't get any! Sometimes it just takes time.

I don't think there are too many guys left that deserve to be put in the Hall and have thus far been overlooked by the BBWA and the Veteran's Committee. In fact, the Veteran's Committee was (is?) a joke and a popularity contest with backroom deals for friends. I still think, though, that in the end most of the deserving guys got in...as well as a few who shouldn't have. No system of voting is perfect, but that's why they vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Writers don't always get it correct right away. The first year of voting (1926) saw Connie Mack, who I think almost everyone would agree is a HOFer, get exactly one vote from the BBWA....one vote. Charlie Gehringer didn't get any! Sometimes it just takes time.

Mack was still an active manager in 1936, the first year of voting, and he certainly didn't deserve to go in as a player. Gehringer was also active in '36. And everyone in '36 was going up against everyone who'd played since the start of baseball. Not quite the same as today.

I don't think there are too many guys left that deserve to be put in the Hall and have thus far been overlooked by the BBWA and the Veteran's Committee.

The problem is that there are literally hundreds of players better than the lower limit of current HOFers who aren't inducted. So if you don't think there are deserving guys left out you have to conclude that many, many undeserving players are already in.

No system of voting is perfect, but that's why they vote.

That's no reason to stick with a system that is clearly broken. You're almost arguing that since we can't achieve perfection we might as well quit trying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, you're certainly right that there are flaws - several in fact. But I think the system is working. Some guys just take a while. Now, maybe you think these are borderline players and the Hall should have a higher standard, but there are many players who took a while to get in. Many voters change their opinions on players over the years.

Jim Rice 15 years

Bert Blyleven 14 years

Bruce Sutter 13 years

Bob Lemon 12 years

Duke Snider 11 years

Don Drysdale 10 years

Goose Gossage 9 years

Writers don't always get it correct right away. The first year of voting (1926) saw Connie Mack, who I think almost everyone would agree is a HOFer, get exactly one vote from the BBWA....one vote. Charlie Gehringer didn't get any! Sometimes it just takes time.

I don't think there are too many guys left that deserve to be put in the Hall and have thus far been overlooked by the BBWA and the Veteran's Committee. In fact, the Veteran's Committee was (is?) a joke and a popularity contest with backroom deals for friends. I still think, though, that in the end most of the deserving guys got in...as well as a few who shouldn't have. No system of voting is perfect, but that's why they vote.

The bolded is certainly true. After all, Hitler was elected Chancellor of Germany.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, you're certainly right that there are flaws - several in fact. But I think the system is working. Some guys just take a while. Now, maybe you think these are borderline players and the Hall should have a higher standard, but there are many players who took a while to get in. Many voters change their opinions on players over the years.

Jim Rice 15 years

Bert Blyleven 14 years

Bruce Sutter 13 years

Bob Lemon 12 years

Duke Snider 11 years

Don Drysdale 10 years

Goose Gossage 9 years

Writers don't always get it correct right away. The first year of voting (1926) saw Connie Mack, who I think almost everyone would agree is a HOFer, get exactly one vote from the BBWA....one vote. Charlie Gehringer didn't get any! Sometimes it just takes time.

I don't think there are too many guys left that deserve to be put in the Hall and have thus far been overlooked by the BBWA and the Veteran's Committee. In fact, the Veteran's Committee was (is?) a joke and a popularity contest with backroom deals for friends. I still think, though, that in the end most of the deserving guys got in...as well as a few who shouldn't have. No system of voting is perfect, but that's why they vote.

Question - did any of the players listed above get as little as 20% of the vote in his first year of eligibility (as Mussina did today)? Any other players in the Hall who did that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just read that Frank Thomas is the first SEC player to ever be elected to the Hall of Fame. That's shocking.

War Eagle, Big Hurt.

Yeah, I was shocked at first too....but then, you'd have to think most HOFs don't go to college because (1) they were studs out of high school and (2) needed the longevity to have HOF careers...

Still though, after 100+ years of baseball, you'd think there would have been one SEC grad...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a long-time Houston resident, I am disappointed for Biggio (again)....a class act and truly deserving HOFer. He was my favorite non-Oriole for pretty much his entire career, and I remember really hoping be would come to Baltimore in 1995 (when we courted both Biggio and Alomar)....Biggio (correctly) decided to stay with the Astros.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of Murray Chass who has publicly stated that he is only going to keep voting so he can:
Finally, an announcement that will disappoint Neyer, Calcaterra and the reader who, like those two bloggers, said they were delighted that this was the last time I would be voting for the Hall of Fame. Sorry, guys I never made it definite.

I said ?barring a change in my thinking,? this could be my last vote. My thinking has changed, and all of you critics can blame yourselves. How could I relinquish my vote knowing how much it annoys you? I plan to vote a year from now even if I just send in a blank ballot. You would love that

This is the same as Joe West or any other of the "uppity" umps who make the game about themselves. You guys are sidebars to the game! Writers and umpires. The game and the Hall are ABOUT THE PLAYERS! Not you afterthoughts! Boy that makes me mad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I've made it clear that if they don't sign Santa and Burnes I'm ok with it as long as the money is allocated to other players they feel that fits their profile better .You know you have people on here like SG who only hears what he wants to hear. I need to learn to ignore that guy. 
    • Oh mr know it all. Who most times is wrong. Lol
    • I also think Santander will age better than Trumbo, despite my repeated comparisons of the two players. But I don't know that he will age better than Trumbo and all of the other one dimensional sluggers who were enjoying the retired millionaire sports star lifestyle by their mid-30s, and I don't want the Orioles to be on the hook when the world finds out in 2 or 3 years. Re-signing Santander to a 4 year, $80 million dollar deal is something the DD/PA regime would have done. Hopefully the ME/DR regime is smarter than that (and I think they are). 22nd percentile is really bad, man. And it's unlikely to improve in his 30s.
    • Looks like Baseball Fandom was at the game today!
    • But that is not what you said. You said he’s a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier. Thus, you were stating he is close to as bad a fielder as Trumbo was, which is not correct. Generally speaking, no player makes up the loss of offensive value with defensive value as the age. It is usually one of the first things to go. I was not making any sort of argument that he was going to make up declining offense with defense, just pointing out that you made a preposterous statement.
    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
    • It's not the money, it's the years.  I wouldn't mind signing him for a year or two, even at what I'd consider to be stupid money.  But what I DON'T agree with is signing him for any more than 2-3 years as I don't think he's going to age well.  And I expect him to get more than 3 years from someone, so I'm a hard pass.  Can we afford him?  Money wise, sure.  But I don't want to see us stuck with him 4-5 years down the road when his skillset has greatly diminished, but he's still playing every day because we owe him a lot of money and a lot of loyalty.  Let some other club take that risk, get the QO pick and move on.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...