Jump to content

Would you have matched SEA offer to keep Cruz an Oriole?


isestrex

Would you have matched 4y/$57M for Cruz?  

160 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you have matched 4y/$57M for Cruz?

    • Yes, that's reasonable
      42
    • No, let the Mariners have him.
      118

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

Our comp pick is between the 1st and 2nd round, not where SEA would've picked.

OK. Also, technically, Cruz was rated higher than Jimenez last offseason and so we lost our first round pick last year for Cruz. However, we already were due to lose our first round pick after signing Jimenez, so in my mind, Cruz cost us our second rounder last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK. Also, technically, Cruz was rated higher than Jimenez last offseason and so we lost our first round pick last year for Cruz. However, we already were due to lose our first round pick after signing Jimenez, so in my mind, Cruz cost us our second rounder last year.

I agree. We gave up a 2nd Rounder for an ALCS and a comp pick. Good move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too many years for a mid 30's good but not great hitter who'd never had a power year like that before and would have been hard pressed to repeat it. If you're going to pay a load of money for a DH, you want it to be for a premier one like Edgar Martinez, David Ortiz, Frank Thomas at the end of his career. Nelson Cruz is not that hitter. He's Adam Jones with more power, no defense, and equally frustrating plate selectivity. You pay Adam Jones that to play center field, you don't pay Nelson Cruz that for four years to sit on the bench the majority of the game and hope he replicates a career year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see. Seattle loses their pick, but it doesn't go to the O's. The O's just get the supplemental pick.

My answer to the poll question depends on what they do to replace his bat. If they manage to make a good trade for Kemp, I'll give them a thumbs up. But if they don't get a reliable middle of the lineup bat, I give them a thumbs down. It's the combination of moves that's more important than the individual moves, imo.

I understand your point, but I don't think anything that we do or fail to do going forward makes that a good deal for the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too many years for a mid 30's good but not great hitter who'd never had a power year like that before and would have been hard pressed to repeat it. If you're going to pay a load of money for a DH, you want it to be for a premier one like Edgar Martinez, David Ortiz, Frank Thomas at the end of his career. Nelson Cruz is not that hitter. He's Adam Jones with more power, no defense, and equally frustrating plate selectivity. You pay Adam Jones that to play center field, you don't pay Nelson Cruz that for four years to sit on the bench the majority of the game and hope he replicates a career year.

Cruz is not remotely comparable to Jones in terms of selectivity. He has a career 7.9% walk rate compared to Jones' 4.4%, and a career swing rate outside the strike zone of 29.9% compared to Jones' 40.8%. Cruz is about league average in both those statistics, whereas Jones is at the extreme.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cruz is not remotely comparable to Jones in terms of selectivity. He has a career 7.9% walk rate compared to Jones' 4.4%, and a career swing rate outside the strike zone of 29.9% compared to Jones' 40.8%. Cruz is about league average in both those statistics, whereas Jones is at the extreme.

Wrong choice of words, I was thinking about OBP and equated that to pitch selectivity when they don't necessarily mean the same thing. But .328 career OBP vs. .320. Point is that Cruz isn't that dissimilar to Jones in terms of getting on base when you really look at the numbers. The difference is he's somewhat better at it and hits for more power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cruz is being paid for almost 10 wins at $6M per win. Or more than he's been worth over the previous four seasons. Seattle is either betting that he ages in reverse, or that baseball inflation is going to be fairly extreme. My figurin' says Cruz is worth about 4/30 based on a weighted average of his last four years and a half a win decline per year. The Mariners essentially doubled that. As I said earlier in the offseason the Orioles should have thanked him for 2014 and the draft pick, given him a nice basket of Orioles-logoed baseballs and some Old Bay, and wished him good luck in whatever place thinks they've found the fountain of youth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...