Jump to content

The struggles with runners in scoring position


Ori-Al

Recommended Posts

Since the All Star break, the O's are 12 for 75 w/ RISP, and they were having problems in that regard before the break, too. In not a small number of those at-bats, Oriole hitters have helped pitchers out by expanding the strike zone, or swinging early at pitcher's pitches instead of looking for a pitch to drive until two strikes. This is an aspect of the game they need to improve, and they are capable, as they led the league in average w/ RISP the first couple months of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Since the All Star break, the O's are 12 for 75 w/ RISP, and they were having problems in that regard before the break, too. In not a small number of those at-bats, Oriole hitters have helped pitchers out by expanding the strike zone, or swinging early at pitcher's pitches instead of looking for a pitch to drive until two strikes. This is an aspect of the game they need to improve, and they are capable, as they led the league in average w/ RISP the first couple months of the season.

What makes you think the Orioles aren't looking for a pitch to drive? They're leading the league in home runs. I'm pretty sure they know how to look for a pitch they can drive. Heck, in the fourth inning situation you're talking about, every out was in the air.

The pitcher gets to have a say in things, too. Sometimes they make good pitches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What makes you think the Orioles aren't looking for a pitch to drive? They're leading the league in home runs. I'm pretty sure they know how to look for a pitch they can drive. Heck, in the fourth inning situation you're talking about, every out was in the air.

The pitcher gets to have a say in things, too. Sometimes they make good pitches.

Hitters need to adjust to the count and situation. What I saw tonight is a lot of guys swinging for the fence no matter what the count. That's not smart baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This says it all:

April: .273/.333/.463 - .796 OPS, 108 R, 23 G = 4.7 R/G

May: .242/.309/.416 - .725 OPS, 110 R, 27 G = 4.1 R/G

June: .300/.357/.531 - .888 OPS, 185 R, 28 G = 6.6 R/G

July: .240/.297/.378 - .675 OPS, 74 R, 21 G = 3.5 R/G*

*Not including today

Who are the real Orioles? Certainly not the June Orioles. I don't think the July Orioles either.

I think it's more like they level out like a 4.5 - 4.6 R/G kind of team.

Interestingly enough, the O's scored 4.4 R/G last year. They're currently at around a 4.8 R/G pace.

It doesn't help that the following is happening:

July

Wieters: .266 OPS

Davis: .557 OPS

Machado: .605 OPS

Jones: .657 OPS

Essentially the middle of the order is dead flat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This says it all:

April: .273/.333/.463 - .796 OPS, 108 R, 23 G = 4.7 R/G

May: .242/.309/.416 - .725 OPS, 110 R, 27 G = 4.1 R/G

June: .300/.357/.531 - .888 OPS, 185 R, 28 G = 6.6 R/G

July: .240/.297/.378 - .675 OPS, 74 R, 21 G = 3.5 R/G*

*Not including today

Who are the real Orioles? Certainly not the June Orioles. I don't think the July Orioles either.

I think it's more like they level out like a 4.5 - 4.6 R/G kind of team.

Interestingly enough, the O's scored 4.4 R/G last year. They're currently at around a 4.8 R/G pace.

It doesn't help that the following is happening:

July

Wieters: .266 OPS

Davis: .557 OPS

Machado: .605 OPS

Jones: .657 OPS

Essentially the middle of the order is dead flat.

There you have it. If we had three Kims we could hit between them we'd be in good shape.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously?

You realize the guy last night, was selected one pick ahead of Gausman, so maybe, he might just be a decent pitcher.

One game isn't the issue. The RISP hitting has been awful all month. When I do my monthly report on the Orioles, I'll calculate the exact RISP numbers for July, but trust me, they'll be terrible. But I'm sure we'll snap out of it eventually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One game isn't the issue. The RISP hitting has been awful all month. When I do my monthly report on the Orioles, I'll calculate the exact RISP numbers for July, but trust me, they'll be terrible. But I'm sure we'll snap out of it eventually.

Just look at the July # for Manny, Davis,and Trumbo. That tells the story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One game isn't the issue. The RISP hitting has been awful all month. When I do my monthly report on the Orioles, I'll calculate the exact RISP numbers for July, but trust me, they'll be terrible. But I'm sure we'll snap out of it eventually.

okay, point taken.

I think at times, they are just trying too much, which accounts for the pop ups, etc.

Like Manny last night, homered, not in the 4th, when they had a solid chance to score. He was disgusted with himself.

But, later on in the game, he got one to drive, and he drove it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I flipped a coin ten times each month. I really want it to come up tails:

April: 5 tails

May: 6 tails

June: 7 tails

July: 2 tails

Now, who wants to take small samples and draw sweeping conclusions about this coin? Seemingly, everyone in this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I flipped a coin ten times each month. I really want it to come up tails:

April: 5 tails

May: 6 tails

June: 7 tails

July: 2 tails

Now, who wants to take small samples and draw sweeping conclusions about this coin? Seemingly, everyone in this thread.

While it's a reasonable analogy to use, the O's have more than 200 RISP opportunities per month, not 10. And I do think that human beings are not coins, and there are times where players grow a bit impatient and skew their results. So, I agree there's a lot of random variation around the mean, but I do think that some of the variation occurs due to psychological factors.

And what sweeping conclusions have been drawn in this thread? I don't see any.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I would prefer not to do a 7 year deal. But my point is if not Burnes than who? How long are we going to be able to trade for 1/2 year rental types (like he currently is)?  If we allow Burnes to walk in FA, then we are going to have to sign someone (who won’t be as good). OR trade one of our top level prospects for a Luzardo or maybe one of the Mariners young controllable starters. If the Reed Sox were allowed sign a Burnes and we do nothing or go with some kind of patchwork Kyle Gibson signing, they would be real close to catching up to us.
    • Obviously, the years/dollars matter in regard to Burnes. I can see where Burnes might be the next in line to lay claim to the Verlander/Scherzer crown as one of the preeminent power pitchers of his time...that is to say he goes through his 30s and comes out the other side as one of the top 5 pitchers in baseball for a decade or longer.  He's been durable, he seems to prepare himself in the way that those guys do and I think he will last.  Of course, it's not my money. I don't know how the new ownership group will approach free agency and quite frankly, I'm not sure if I really care at the moment.  I'm sure I'll care in the offseason, though. I will say, I'd really like to see the new ownership spend to lock up the talent we already have before spending on free agency.   
    • Completely agree. Not sure what the analytics would say, but to me (from TV vantage point), Kremer’s best stuff comes by two pairings: (A) 4 seam 95mph at top of zone and curveball, and (B) splitter and 2 seamer at bottom of the zone.  Both probably tunnel in the same way to the batters.  And his cutter should be reserved only for jamming lefties on their hands, bc he hangs far too many meatballs against righties. 
    • How was the weather?  My recollection was that he didn’t have a feel for it that game and had trouble locating either for a strike or close enough to get a chase.
    • We can just say impact = well above replacement level. Kremer is a great guy to have as our #5 as he would have been on Opening Day if not for the aforementioned starter injuries. I'm sure no one really thought Bradish would be AL Cy Young-4 in his second year in the MLB. That's a fantastic hit by Elias. That and getting Gunnar in the 2nd may be the most impressive things Elias has done?  To answer your question, no I probably didn't think much of Bradish when we got him as an A Ball pitcher. Would I have bet he individually would be elite? No. But would I bet there'd be an elite pitcher in all the pitching prospects we got back for Manny Machado, Zach Britton, Jonathan Schoop, Kevin Gausman, Darren O'Day, Dylan Bundy, Jonathan Villar, Miguel Castro, Jose Iglesias, Cole Susler, Tanner Scott? Well I'd hope so. Out of them we got Bradish, Kremer, and Tate (1 elite SP, 1 decent SP, 1 reliever and a bunch of names we've forgotten). I'll take it. We'll see what we get any SP's out of the Trey Mancini and Jorge Lopez hauls.  Now we're in a different position where we aren't selling off assets to get back dart throws. At this point, our conversation will get circular but it will take value in prospects or value in dollars or some combination of both to get more elite talent in the rotation. Don't expect to give middle tier contracts out and get back elite level performance. And I don't think we'll be able to maintain this ridiculous level our farm system is at forever. And we won't be able to have the luxury of sending off 12 years of Joey Ortiz and DL Hall type players for 1 year rentals every year.     
    • I actually think you hit on it.   The more realistic extension candidates are Cowser, Westburg, Kjerstad, Mayo, and Basallo.
    • I like it. Tomorrow will be the intersting one. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...