Jump to content

Happy Monday!! Any promotions today?


Aglets

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Frobby said:

Don’t see why.  Aberdeen has been basically a .500 team in the second half, with very little offense.  They could use the help.  

I meant to say the offensively challenged ballpark, not the team.  But yes, every little bit of help goes a long way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

We all know Holliday got promoted to Aberdeen.   It looks like his replacement at Delmarva is Angel Tejada a 19 yo infielder who hit pretty well at FCL last year.    Anthony Servideo gets promoted all the way up to Bowie which is good and bad.   It gives him a chance to do something an actually stick up there.   The bad part is that the Orioles never jump a guy two levels like this unless they consider him an organization type at this point.   He hadn't done a whole lot at Delmrava after missing a ton of time the last two years due to injury.     Gilbert Lara goes from starting SS at Bowie to reserve IF at Norfolk.    Still no sign of Conner Burns at Bowie who is still listed on the 7-day DL.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

We all know Holliday got promoted to Aberdeen.   It looks like his replacement at Delmarva is Angel Tejada a 19 yo infielder who hit pretty well at FCL last year.    Anthony Servideo gets promoted all the way up to Bowie which is good and bad.   It gives him a chance to do something an actually stick up there.   The bad part is that the Orioles never jump a guy two levels like this unless they consider him an organization type at this point.   He hadn't done a whole lot at Delmrava after missing a ton of time the last two years due to injury.     Gilbert Lara goes from starting SS at Bowie to reserve IF at Norfolk.    Still no sign of Conner Burns at Bowie who is still listed on the 7-day DL.

Yeah the Servideo "promotion" is pretty curious. Definitely feels like "alright, you're healthy finally and you're 24, time to sink or swim at the age-appropriate level". 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, interloper said:

Yeah the Servideo "promotion" is pretty curious. Definitely feels like "alright, you're healthy finally and you're 24, time to sink or swim at the age-appropriate level". 

Yep, they've done this with a few of the older guys. The good news for him is without Burns, there is playing time available at SS at Bowie. I think Preto may get more looks there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I think Holliday was pretty much the only guy for which a quick promotion would have been expected.

I agree with Mooreisbetter, I could see them making a move with Willems if he has another crazy hot 2 weeks, and maybe with Kjerstad if he really starts killing it again, but other than that I think this thread will be pretty quiet until mid-June or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, glenn__davis said:

Yeah I think Holliday was pretty much the only guy for which a quick promotion would have been expected.

I agree with Mooreisbetter, I could see them making a move with Willems if he has another crazy hot 2 weeks, and maybe with Kjerstad if he really starts killing it again, but other than that I think this thread will be pretty quiet until mid-June or so.

Agreed about Kjerstad. He's got to go on the 40-man this winter so I think they will push him up if he's having success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking Kjerstad could be moved up in the next few weeks. They probably would like to see him get 400 PAs there this year if possible and see if he's an option for next year. At least that's what I would do. The only reason to keep him in Bowie longer is to give him priority play at 1B to get him a longer look there defensively.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I'm thinking Kjerstad could be moved up in the next few weeks. They probably would like to see him get 400 PAs there this year if possible and see if he's an option for next year. At least that's what I would do. The only reason to keep him in Bowie longer is to give him priority play at 1B to get him a longer look there defensively.

Seems like they should be able to give him as many reps at 1B at Norfolk as they'd want. Not like we have any premium prospects playing the position on that team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I mean more notable for anything. It's been around 60 years and you don't even have a State Senator or CEO to crow about?
    • If Mayo and Holliday are here next year, one of them most certainly has to move to the OF. There is only one position available. Henderson, Westburg, and Mountcastle are all starting caliber INFs. For a team who is trying to win a WS (like I assume the goal will be again next season) I don't see the wisdom in introducing too much possible volatility at one time due to the variance in performance that young players (first time big leaguers can produce). To have a lineup where Holliday, Mayo, (Kjerstad and Norby for that matter) are all trying to acclimate/figuring out how to hit big league pitching all at the same time does not seem like a wise move and it definitely doesn't seem like something Elias would do. I'm not sure that I see this is a move that would be ultra-risky or a move that would be for a rebuilding team. We are obviously going to be in the postseason and we could go all the way. If we were to turn around after a successful season and then jettison all vets and go with a rebuild lineup with half or more being occupied with young players prospects, I think it would come with a lot of negative PR and most likely a negative fan reaction. Teams who are successful and have young stars/cornerstone players under multiple years of control/contract (Rutschman, Henderson) don't typically decide to rebuild/reset in the midst of that. That could be detrimental to the teams bottom line and that would be a hard sell to an owner who has just taken over the team.
    • Yes, Boras clients occasionally sign extensions.  No, Boras won’t prevent a client that wants to sign an extension from doing so.  Yes, Boras clients sign fewer pre-FA extensions than clients of other agencies (based on comparing his share of pre-FA extensions vs. his larger share of MLB players). That’s because of either the advice he gives, attracting clients with a similar philosophy, or both. Scott has never signed a player with less than two years of service time to a long-term extension.  He has only signed 1 pre-arb player to a long-term extension which was 13 years ago (Carlos Gonzalez). Expectations of signing Gunnar or Westburg to extensions need to be calibrated against this reality.  
    • A.J. Preller is apparently a good talent evaluator and an aggressive GM.   I get the feeling he thinks they can keep replacing prospects through the draft and J2 signings.   He’s kind of painted himself into a corner with the current team.  He traded for Arráez.   The Padres were already rumored to be interested in Crochet.  I wouldn’t put it past Heller.  Of course, Crochet isn’t a rental so it’s not quite selling your soul to the devil to trade an Ethan Salas for him.  Not sure what else they have to offer.
    • I didn't really know either until the news of his death, which was kind of a lightbulb moment for me in relation to the extreme all-in approach the Padres had been taking in recent years. The family has kept a lot of details private, but from reading a couple of the articles after he passed, he had already gone through a couple of different tough cancer fights and it was known around the industry that his health was tenuous. I don't know if he got a specific prognosis before the end, but it seems clear that he wasn't taking any time for granted and wanted to push to make things happen while he could. It's not really relevant for the O's, but it has come up now and then when some folks start asking why the O's couldn't try to spend like the Padres - it's clear now that the Padres were in a unique situation.
    • No, but my family should get a good dose.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...