Jump to content

Orioles offer BRob 3yr 30 million


33rdst

Recommended Posts

Brian needs to be very careful. If the soft free agent continues he may wish he had taken the 3/30. Either way, the Orioles have made IMO a very fair offer. I disagree with the theory that he will tail off after 3 additional years but any more is pushing it. Considering a very similar player (Hudson) has not gotten an offer yet, Brian should have grabbed the pen.

That's probably true, the market is getting softer as we close in on spring ball, not stronger. Players waiting for owners to get desperate may have to wait until July, when contenders look for depth.

I know a certain Bosox team captain who didn't anticipate the market continuing to fall.

-Don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 192
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Peace and anonymous seem to be.
You're making some pretty big assumptions, SG. I feel way different than you about BRob's value to the team and with respect to the wisdom of trying to extend him. But that doesn't equate to offering him, nor anyone else, either a blank check or a make-up-for-past-injustice blind overpayment.

Having said that, I am already on record with the concept of offering him a contract that an objective observer would deem "reasonably generous" (not blank check) -- and then be willing to kick in as much as a $1 mil per year premium, in recognition of the special value that he brings to the team. Guys like Markakis, Guthrie, and Roberts, along with the young guys just starting to percolate through the system (starting with Adam Jones and Wieters), are the core around which this team should be built.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is wrong with this picture? We are paying Markakis $11Million per year and offering B-Rob $10 Million per year yet the Red Sox just extended Youk and Pedroia for about $6 Million per year each.

It's all about age, service time and the position they play.

Youklis, 1B (age 29) - 4.093 ML Service Time, 4 years @ $41.125m

Pedroia, 2B (age 24) - 2.014 ML Service Time, 6 years @ $40.5m

If Roberts signs an extension that begins in 2010, than -

Roberts, 2B (age 32 in 2010) - 7.131 ML Service Time, 3 years @ $30.0m

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brian needs to be very careful. If the soft free agent continues he may wish he had taken the 3/30. Either way, the Orioles have made IMO a very fair offer. I disagree with the theory that he will tail off after 3 additional years but any more is pushing it. Considering a very similar player (Hudson) has not gotten an offer yet, Brian should have grabbed the pen.

Isn't this a matter of Roberts not liking what he is seeing in FA salaries this season? Maybe he is willing to take a risk that he can more in the 2010 offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're making some pretty big assumptions, SG. I feel way different than you about BRob's value to the team and with respect to the wisdom of trying to extend him. But that doesn't equate to offering him, nor anyone else, either a blank check or a make-up-for-past-injustice blind overpayment.

Having said that, I am already on record with the concept of offering him a contract that an objective observer would deem "reasonably generous" (not blank check) -- and then be willing to kick in as much as a $1 mil per year premium, in recognition of the special value that he brings to the team. Guys like Markakis, Guthrie, and Roberts, along with the young guys just starting to percolate through the system (starting with Adam Jones and Wieters), are the core around which this team should be built.

You seemed to agree with Peace and his 4/48-52 deal, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brian needs to be very careful. If the soft free agent continues he may wish he had taken the 3/30. Either way, the Orioles have made IMO a very fair offer. I disagree with the theory that he will tail off after 3 additional years but any more is pushing it. Considering a very similar player (Hudson) has not gotten an offer yet, Brian should have grabbed the pen.

If Brian is just sick of all the losing and wants out then maybe losing out on a couple million might not be that big of a deal to him. Not every ball player is full of greed like Tex and Arod. No offense Yankee fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You seemed to agree with Peace and his 4/48-52 deal, right?
Not necessarily. I agree with the CONCEPT of paying Roberts fair market value plus a premium (as I've suggested, a premium of $1 mil/yr above what an "objective observer" would consider "reasonably generous"). As to what precisely those numbers are and should be, I plead ignorance. I'm not smart enough to know the precise contours of the market.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not necessarily. I agree with the CONCEPT of paying Roberts fair market value plus a premium (as I've suggested, a premium of $1 mil/yr above what an "objective observer" would consider "reasonably generous"). As to what precisely those numbers are and should be, I plead ignorance. I'm not smart enough to know the precise contours of the market.

You have to have some idea of what you would give him? What is your threshold?

Would you go 4 years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Tony.

So, here are the questions I have:

1) Are we willing to move off of that offer?

2) In this market, why wouldn't BRob sign that deal?

3) Is BRob just waiting for Hudson to sign?

4) Did AM offer a contract that he would be fine with but knows BROb won't accept to save face with the fans?

I am not so sure that he would get that offer from another team.

If I were him I would give that offer serious consideration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Brian is just sick of all the losing and wants out then maybe losing out on a couple million might not be that big of a deal to him. Not every ball player is full of greed like Tex and Arod. No offense Yankee fans.[/quote

That may well be the case and maybe next years market may be better or maybe Cano continues to fade and the brinks truck Yankees come calling. All things considered that is a lot of maybe's especially when the Orioles have seemingly stepped up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This might have been covered somewhere else but maybe Roberts doesn't want 3/$30m because he simply doesn't want to be here. Sure he's saying all the right things in public, but would you really think he'd say otherwise?

The guy hasn't been on a winning team his entire MLB career. Not only that but he's experienced some truly dreadful team lowlights while he's been here. He's not only been on bad teams but been a part of a laughingstock org despite the fact its improved now.

If I put myself in his shoes I'm thinking here's my chance to walk unless they want to really overpay me. Sure there's some financial risk involved but maybe he's alright with it b/c the losing is grating on him so badly. He's getting toward the tail end of his career so maybe he wants to make those years count.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We would be overpaying if we offered 4/48.

Don't you think so?

In this market.

I want to keep him, but that is a lot.

If 3/30 wasn't good enough, maybe counter with 3/33 and something similar to the Markakis option year deal for year four (2 million buyout or B-Rob could go elsewhere after three years)?

-Don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...