Jump to content

Orioles close to acquiring Corbin Burnes (Update: Acquired for Joey Ortiz and DL Hall)


ThisIsBirdland

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, TradeAngelos said:

So you think a 30 yr old former Cy Young winner with a 1 whip is not getting a massive premium contract this offseason if he just doesn't implode? 

Declined from what? A Cy Young winner to just a normal TOR starter? Because all careers go in a perfect linear path with no ups or downs. If it ticks a tiny bit up at 30, it is a clear sign of impending disaster. 

WE HAVE MONEY NOW. We don't have to worry about not ever signing a FA again if in yr 6 or 7 the contract doesn't look great. Stop living in the past and recognize the future and where we are going with new ownership. 

Never said he won't get that type of deal, just that I don't think the O's should give him that deal.  And I'm also not just going to presume it's going to start raining money.  Just because it's (theoretically) there doesn't mean we should spend with impunity.  Look at the Mets last year.  Give Elias whatever his higher payroll ceiling is and let him keep doing his excellent work.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, spleen1015 said:

We can still get Cease.

I think you only go for Cease still if you don't think Means will be ready to go or he really reinjured it worse than we thought at the end of the seaosn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think the ownership change had anything to do with this move. It’s a nice combo but I think teams don’t want to wait until spring training starts in case of an injury. 
 

I’m not wasting my time worried about Burnes long term. Just looking forward to him dealing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Whatever dreams Getz and the White Sox had of milking the Orioles farm system by trading Cease have gone up in smoke tonight. They can still get Cease, but they will need to readjust their expectations.

 

Hilarious. That will be such a good read when I get to that. Mayo or Basallo. Hahahahahha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, StottyByNature said:

Never said he won't get that type of deal, just that I don't think the O's should give him that deal.  And I'm also not just going to presume it's going to start raining money.  Just because it's (theoretically) there doesn't mean we should spend with impunity.  Look at the Mets last year.  Give Elias whatever his higher payroll ceiling is and let him keep doing his excellent work.  

I also don’t think it’s a given that it’s going to start raining money but goddam it’s hard not to be excited right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, StottyByNature said:

Never said he won't get that type of deal, just that I don't think the O's should give him that deal.  And I'm also not just going to presume it's going to start raining money.  Just because it's (theoretically) there doesn't mean we should spend with impunity.  Look at the Mets last year.  Give Elias whatever his higher payroll ceiling is and let him keep doing his excellent work.  

Signing a #1 pitcher to a market rate deal does not mean it is raining money, or we are putting ourselves in a bad financial situation. That is what teams trying t win a championship d all the time. I know it is an unfamiliar position to be in, but if we are trying to win it all these are the moves that need to be made. We could afford TWO of him and still wouldn't have a league average payroll. We have all our young players dirt cheap for 4-5 more years, now is the time to actually be an "average" payroll team by adding top end starter(s). We have so much cheap talent to offset huge deals it is not funny. Let's start using it to do just that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

Incredible deal. I can’t believe this is the reality we live in. 

Burnes has some red flags in that his velo and some of his numbers are trending in the wrong direction. BUT. His stuff is still nasty and he’s been incredibly durable. Eno Sarris’ analysis from a few days ago (where he’s rated as the #2 fantasy pitcher this year):

The burgeoning offensive environment and maybe the shape of his season (his worst months were April and June) obscured the fact that Burnes had a near-vintage season in 2023. Still, he did lose nearly a tick on the fastball and some whiffs, so it wasn’t all good news. A strong health grade, top-of-the-line stuff, and a large enough arsenal that he could still tweak for whiffs if he wanted — these are reasons to believe. As an example, he had a top-three curve by Stuff+ and only threw it 18 percent of the time. He’s still got some tricks up his sleeve as he ages.

Burnes got one of the rare “A” in health grade. 

 

One of the best pitchers in baseball is on the Orioles. A true “ace” by any definition. I simply cannot believe it. 

2023 is a different year, but I'm much more comfortable with Burnes over Cease. Cease has had only one outstanding pitching season in his career. Burnes has been consistently good with the Brewers and led the NL in WHIP last season.

Edited by OsFanSinceThe80s
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe if we were to sign a QO FA that we would lose our 3rd pick in the draft no matter what the round. So… if now we sign Montgomery or Snell… then we’d only lose a 2nd rd pick and not one of our three firsts we had. 
 

Edit - no pick loss for Montgomery

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Dammit.. I missed that too... Well, Perez and Coulombe will still be in the pen. I don't think Elias is done now that the gloves have been taken off.

Irvin is still here and this certainly leaves Wells in the pen.  Right now, I see:

Kimbrell, Cano, Wells, Tate and Webb from the right side and Perez, Coulombe and Irvin from the left.  We could certainly add to that but it looks pretty good as it is.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • 1) I don't think it's a bad idea to consider moving on from non-productive vets like Hays and possibly Mullins as well. 2) I'm almost starting to move toward the opinion of re-signing Santander. He is likely not to require a major financial commitment (3/4 years at modest money). And I believe because most of his contributions come from counting stats (homers and RBIs) he is likely to be undervalued in this era of statcast baseball. 3) Elias has never (IMO for good reason) decided to take the approach of multiple/several first timers learning on the job at all at once. The potential for that to go sideways represents too much risk, when you are trying to win a World Series. 4) You didn't just mention moving on from Mullins and Hays. But you also mentioned Santander, O'Hearn, and Mountcastle. That is FIVE regulars and replacing them all with players who have never proven that they can hit Major League pitching. I would almost bet that there aren't 5 first timers in all of MLB who are succeeding this season on their first try. Now obviously, for Holliday next season will be his second try. And I guess 3rd for Stowers, maybe 4th depending how you look at it. And second/third for Kjerstad, Norby (I guess second). Though some of these guys stints were so short, I don't know if they could even get/make much of it some of those previous times. 5) If we make it to the postseason (which we are almost assured to do) win or lose this year in the Fall, it will be a very poor message to send to the fanbase to not spend/add in the offseason. With a payroll this low (ranked what 25th?) you should not be cutting cost and especially with a multi-billionaire owner. 6) If you don't trade any of these players this season, how do you propose that we get better/get the piece(s) that we need? 7) Even with all of these new young players and even if all of them performed right away, where is the pitching going to come from next season in order to legitimately contend (if you don't spend in the offseason)?
    • Nobody thought Toronto would not cash in on their "window". It slammed shut on them and they had a lot of young talent that regressed pretty hard. Cautionary tales are out there.
    • What an odd question. Of course it’s important. The entire baseball world will be paying attention to this series. The two best teams in all baseball, in the same division, each going for a crown at the expense of the other, and neither a big fan of the other. Wins are important regardless of the opponent, but it also goes without saying that we would rather win three out of four against the Yankees, than three out of four against the Athletics, or even other contenders like the Mariners or Guards.  
    • Yeah, too much young talent for that to happen next year, unless some major regression and injuries happen.
    • Mike Elias' job certainly entails doing due diligence on Jack Flaherty again.  
    • even if they do, so what? 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...