Jump to content

ESPN is reporting...


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

The Mitchell report is already written. It's as if the committee has some agreement with Selig not to release this now as it could detract from the playoffs and world series. The irony is by waiting to release the names, it only serves to stir up what will already be an enormous media frenzy.

I would be extraordinarily surprised if the timing of the report's release wasn't a main topic of discussion during that conference call.

The championships and World Series generates a lot of money for a lot of people and if those three series are overshadowed by this story, a lot of revenue could be lost.

I will be interested to see what the story becomes if there are players in any of these series named. Even if their PED use was in the past, that would add a new ugly dimension to an already ugly story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 168
  • Created
  • Last Reply
The Mitchell report is already written. It's as if the committee has some agreement with Selig not to release this now as it could detract from the playoffs and world series.

I agree with both of these 2 statements.

The irony is by waiting to release the names, it only serves to stir up what will already be an enormous media frenzy.

I don't know...

Do you really think this is stirring up something huge right now? I don't. I think that for 99.9% of people, and for 99.9% of the media, the focus is very much on the postseason and not-yet on this. I hope/expect/pray it will stay this way until after the WS is over. The media attention to it might ramp up a wee bit, but I don't think it will become the primary baseball story until after the WS is over. If it somehow becomes a big media thing before the WS is over, then I will be PO'd at the media for providing Yet Another Case of showing bad judgment. There's nothing wrong with waiting. Just waiting for a couple weeks ain't like a cover-up or anything else that's bad.

I think it would be colossally dumb of MLB to not-wait until after the WS. When the crap hits the fan, it will drown-out a lot of stuff. I think MB is wrong about various things, but I think they're absolutely right for letting the WS happen first. IMO, the World Series is the absolute king of American sports events (not only because of tradition, but also because it has way more Actual Sport and way less Hype than do the comparable football events). Regardless of people's differing opinions about the whole 'roids mess, I would think that we'd all want it to not screw up the World Series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you really think this is stirring up something huge right now? I don't. I think that for 99.9% of people, and for 99.9% of the media, the focus is very much on the postseason and not-yet on this.

This is the build-up:
According to those familiar with the conference call, Tom Carlucci, a lawyer for MLB, told the team representatives on the conference call that the report is going to be "salacious."

Said one source familiar with what was said on the conference call, "This is going to be enormous ... it's going to be a huge story when these names come out."

Source - Buster Olney

It may not be a bigger story than e.g. the Rockies run but it is a dark ominous cloud hanging over baseball. This won't go away until Halloween. I'll bet someone "leaks" some of the information in advance and the media is in heavy competition mode to be the first with the story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the build-up:

Source - Buster Olney

It may not be a bigger story than e.g. the Rockies run but it is a dark ominous cloud hanging over baseball. This won't go away until Halloween. I'll bet someone "leaks" some of the information in advance and the media is in heavy competition mode to be the first with the story.

I agree that whatever they said on the conference call will be leaked.

I agree that the media will show no restraint whatsoever.

I think what happens will be determined by 2 things:

1. Whether MLB was smart enough to not give any particulars in the conference call.

2. Whether MLB has been smart enough to keep knowledge of the details within a small circle of people who can keep their mouths shut.

It sounds like they did Number 1.

I think we're about to find out if they did Number 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buster Olney reports:

According to those familiar with the conference call, Tom Carlucci, a lawyer for MLB, told the team representatives on the conference call that the report is going to be "salacious."

According the the American Heritage Dictionary:

Salacious

1. Appealing to or stimulating sexual desire; lascivious.

2. Lustful; bawdy.

Well, this throws an entirely different light on things, doesn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or you want to know about the past because you want to restore lost credibility to a game where many fans/ex-fans think the game is just a step above WWE when it comes to the integrity of the competition and its records.

There is also value in knowing what happened in the past simply for no other reason than the historical record.

What there is no value in is sweeping it all under the rug.

I agree. Sweeping it under the rug will raise far more questions. With Mitchell releasing the names it proves baseball isn't trying to hide. The IRS can't catch everyone who cheats on their taxes but that shouldn't stop them for trying to catch people that do. Consumers have a right to know what players used PED's. Selig had nothing to do with this investigation either, it is all Mitchell. The report would have no value if the names were covered up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it matters much....These guys are getting tested now and are showing to be clean.

I don't think it hurts Miggy's trade value if it turns out he was roiding back in 2004.

Not exactly. Clean as in they're not taking anything that can be detected by MLB's testing system, but we all know that the tests don't detect what a lot of guys are using.

Concerning your second point, if he was using steroids then, and isn't now, then that should hurt his value quite a bit actually. His power has dropped a lot over the last year and a half, so it would just be assumed that it's because he's no longer using, not because he's tired of playing for a loser or swinging for contact or whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not exactly. Clean as in they're not taking anything that can be detected by MLB's testing system, but we all know that the tests don't detect what a lot of guys are using.

Concerning your second point, if he was using steroids then, and isn't now, then that should hurt his value quite a bit actually. His power has dropped a lot over the last year and a half, so it would just be assumed that it's because he's no longer using, not because he's tired of playing for a loser or swinging for contact or whatever.

Doesn't matter...Even if he isn't viewed as a 900 OPS/30 homer guy, he can still be viewed as a 800-850 OPS/20-25 homer guy.

If he is named in this report, i doubt his value is any different between now and then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, SG, his value will be different. You can't slap a stat on it, but no one wants someone who's perceived as a roider, doesn't matter how long ago they did it.

It's negative PR for a team that'd be picking him up. No one wants that.

Look back at the cocaine days in the 80's, some players from then still have that stigma....and this promises to be way bigger than that.

He'll be viewed as tarnished goods and his trade value will take a ding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't matter...Even if he isn't viewed as a 900 OPS/30 homer guy, he can still be viewed as a 800-850 OPS/20-25 homer guy.

If he is named in this report, i doubt his value is any different between now and then.

Well I think that's wrong because teams would rather not deal with the bad press from adding prominent players from this list. Of course they would, but if they have the choice of a guy from the list, and a guy who hasn't been accused of any wrongdoing, they'll take the latter.

That along with the point I just mentioned hurts his value imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone is basically a perceived roider or HGHer it seems.

Do you think if it came out that Pujols was/is using HGH, that teams would trade less for him?

I just don't think teams care as much about this as many think. Seeing as so many are doing it, it would be hard to have a team full of guys who aren't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, SG, his value will be different. You can't slap a stat on it, but no one wants someone who's perceived as a roider, doesn't matter how long ago they did it.

It's negative PR for a team that'd be picking him up. No one wants that.

Look back at the cocaine days in the 80's, some players from then still have that stigma....and this promises to be way bigger than that.

He'll be viewed as tarnished goods and his trade value will take a ding.

You've nailed it IMO. If he's on the list I still think we can get a decent package for him considering how little there will be available but he'll be a plan C or D for teams whereas he might be a plan A or B for teams w/o being tagged as a cheater.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think some of you guys are making too big of a deal about steroids in baseball, but I've made that point before, so I guess there's no need to get back into it again. I'd prefer steroids to be totally eliminated from the sport, and wish they were never in it, but I'm not going to come down on these guys that much for using, it's very understandable why they did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • They better have Westburg jersey's in the team store.
    • That's fine.  That's a take with the appropriate amount of subtlety. The silly rhetorical questions, "How can he learn to hit ML pitching in AAA?" devised to produce a foregone conclusion have no such subtlety. 
    • We could also give up the farm for Jesus Luzardo, as was your plan in the offseason 
    • I’ll leave the player evaluations to you since it’s your specialty.  I just gave reasons why I don’t think we see Povich anytime soon.   
    • How about you give a confidence ranking & ratings (1-10) for those 5 guys to be reliable, productive starters. I would probably put Irvin a clear #1 of the 5, with a confidence level of about 6 out of 10
    • It's a very heavy International program offense since the Orioles rarely draft high school hitters. This is the first time many of these guys have hit in cold weather, so they get a bit of a pass so far. Saying that, the struggles are pretty disappointing, especially for Tavera and Arias, but they are at least not doing too bad in controlling the strike zone so far. Arias in the 7-day IL and hasn't played since April 13th.  Sosa has hit a lot of doubles, but the K's are too high. He's been walking more this last week so that's good.  Acevedo has been a disappointment for me. I keep waiting for him to breakout, but I think he just may be who he is, a toolsy guy that just doesn't have enough hit tool. Mordan can hit a little bit but doesn't have a position. The defense overall has been pretty bad too, with 4th most errors (25) in the Carolina League leading to 19 unearned runs and a lot of extra pitches.
    • I agree, and I don't really see it as Jordan just riding a hot streak. He probably won't end up 6th in MLB in WAR, like he is now, but I think he is going to be a very good player for many years to come. I love the way he plays. He hits it hard consistently, fields well at multiple positions, runs well and seems to be in the middle of most rallies. He brings back some memories of Bobby Grich to me, and I could see him having a Grich like career with multiple All-Star appearances.  I know there is a lot of young talent coming up, but I think there are going to be players moving around to other spots rather than pushing Jordan to a utility role or a trade. I see him in the lineup on an everyday basis for years to come, whether it is at 2B or 3B.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...