Jump to content

The second guessing Hyde thread.


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I wish the beat reporters would ask more questions about the rationale behind strategic decisions Hyde makes, and fewer “how big was this win tonight” type questions.   Though questions about wins are always good.  

Was he ever asked about putting Jorge Lopez into that game on Sunday? I’d love an answer to that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I wish the beat reporters would ask more questions about the rationale behind strategic decisions Hyde makes, and fewer “how big was this win tonight” type questions.   Though questions about wins are always good.  

He will have to answer some tough questions from the national media in the playoffs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, dystopia said:

Was he ever asked about putting Jorge Lopez into that game on Sunday? I’d love an answer to that. 

I don't have a problem putting him in to finish the inning. It was bringing him back out that had me screaming at the TV. You have to be happy with anything you get from him and to not push your luck. I felt like Hyde left him out there to fail. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MCO'sFan said:

I don't have a problem putting him in to finish the inning. It was bringing him back out that had me screaming at the TV. You have to be happy with anything you get from him and to not push your luck. I felt like Hyde left him out there to fail. 

But see that’s only because he got the outs. If he struggles in the sixth, everyone’s (rightfully) asking why he was put into such an important game at all with a rested bullpen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, dystopia said:

But see that’s only because he got the outs. If he struggles in the sixth, everyone’s (rightfully) asking why he was put into such an important game at all with a rested bullpen. 

I hear you but he does pitch well in short spirts. You may disagree with me but I don't think that was an egregious error. Bringing him back out was. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, webbrick2010 said:

Yep, I don't think the stats would support this, especially considering the present state of the O's bullpen

I bet the stats do in fact support that.  This entire organization runs on numbers and the decisions are based on those.  It also was probably why they didn’t have them up at first but then moved them in once there was two strikes which probably suggest weaker contact.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, foxfield said:

In general Hyde has clearly done well. Managers make many decisions that look good when they pan out and of course look poor when they don’t. 
 

He has really done a nice job keeping these guys on an even keel. Of course most managers look good when their teams plate on a 100 win pace. 
 

I always thought he would be here until they were competitive and then someone else would be brought in. But I am happy with him and the job he has done. No manager is right all the time. 
 

There are many things we have questioned from Frazier to Ohearn to Mateo. All in all, his way has been the right way. The new Oriole Way. 

Me too.  I thought for sure he was a transitional manager when he started out.  But either he grew into being the youngster/underperforming vet whisperer or it was a behind the scenes attribute that Elias had identified - which ever it was, I'm glad it's occurred and happy for him.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are trying to win, and they are trying to restore Lopez to what he was when we traded him.  Sometimes, that requires putting him into high leverage situations and testing him, even if there’s some risk to winning the game.  It didn’t go well, but I understand giving him the opportunity.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

They are trying to win, and they are trying to restore Lopez to what he was when we traded him.  Sometimes, that requires putting him into high leverage situations and testing him, even if there’s some risk to winning the game.  It didn’t go well, but I understand giving him the opportunity.  

I agree, but that was the worst game/situation to "test him". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Ridgway22 said:

Where can I find a pair of those 20/20 glasses you have on?

Mostly kidding but so easy to decide what are good and bad situations well after the outcome is known.

Given the importance of that game, no hindsight is required on that one. 

He's not even eligible for the postseason roster, so "testing him" seems rather pointless anyway. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dystopia said:

Given the importance of that game, no hindsight is required on that one. 

He's not even eligible for the postseason roster, so "testing him" seems rather pointless anyway. 

We are playing for a chance to win the AL East and be the #1 Seed in the AL. There are no games that are unimportant. But we have to keep giving people opportunities. Most of these guys are already prettty gassed. It’s all hands on deck. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I’m disappointed and found myself questioning Hyde the past few days.  But being pissed that we got swept by the 86 win Royals a year after watching the Rangers do what they did, and witnessing the Tigers sweep the Astros dilutes any argument to the point of irrationality. In addition, acting like the O’s were the only team that kicked a$$ the first half the season and fell off post all star break is short sighted.  Five teams were on pace to win 99-103 games on July 1.  No one reached that mark.  The cream of the crop all had their fair share of struggles. Dismissing or brushing off our rash of injuries as not having a strong impact on this team’s performance is just asinine.     Saying this team wasn’t trying or lacked fire is an insult.  Losing isn’t fun, but to confuse a team struggling with an apathetic spirit is a ridiculous take. Someone noted the other day (SG?) that the league collectively found the hole in the O’s swing the second half, and we didn’t have the hitters to adjust is the closest rationale reasoning for our struggles.  That you can blame Elias, Hyde and his staff.  They have this offseason to make changes but let’s also not ignore that the 2023 team was made up of many of these same players and excelled in the areas they face-planted the second half of 2024 when the offense became one dimensional.  Posting over and over and over about the Rogers trade is tiring.  It turned out to be disappointing, but I highly doubt it cost us to win or lose one more game because of that trade.   Acting like Ron Washington or another older crusty manager is the answer is laughable.  I loved Buck, but he is the last of his type. I remember Britton going to the Yanks and applauding their analytics.  Other players are coming to the O’s and are raving about ours now.  Other teams are modeling their player development after us.  Some fans crap all over it, but having been a fan during the analytical dark ages, I’m super proud of where this organization is now and feel we are in a position for years to come.  Others would rather just piss and moan and fondly reminisce in a time when in reality, the O’s player development was the laughingstock throughout the league. Screaming Hyde should be fired, posting that we were better off with Angelos as the owner, calling Elias as arrogant… ugh.  Maybe we should bring back Syd Thrift from the grave and check on what Sam Perlozzo is up to now a days just to give some a perspective of what extreme disappointment truly feels like.  
    • So clearly not in shape or banged up in various ways that he doesn't want to specify.  Get in shape and figure it the hell out. 
    • This team needs to learn how to get on base. Homer's are nice, but some times hitting the single the opposite way is even nicer.  Watching the games all season, it appeared that pretty much the entire team was looking to hit the 5 run Homer, swinging out of their shoes every at bat
    • I want Hyde gone. He ain’t the guy.
    • Or just beat the team with the worse record in the worse division.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...