4/24: In Matusz We Trust

[SurhoffRules]

I still hate Youkilus.

[isestrex]

We needed that 3rd run. Why didn't Izzi bunt and move the runner to second. Then GB by Monty would have scored the run. Did we expect the 3 run HR from Izzi?:rolleyestf:

Managers don't generally call for a bunt with a runner on 3rd

[isestrex]

Lowell already helping us out a lot today

[Mike B]

Mike Lowell can not run even a little anymore. iF he was an Oriole and With that effort down the line, the OH would have fired DT by now.

[UMDTerrapins]

Easy prey for Matusz.

[isestrex]

23 pitches through 2

Matusz K watch <img src="http://usera.ImageCave.com/isestrex/Emoticons/cowdance.gif">

K

[Mike B]

We needed that 3rd run. Why didn't Izzi bunt and move the runner to second. Then GB by Monty would have scored the run. Did we expect the 3 run HR from Izzi?:rolleyestf:

Great hindsight managing. How many sac bunts with runners on first and third, let alone no outs have you seen?

[The Epic]

Go jonesy!

[isestrex]

Bazooka!!!!! :clap3::clap3:

[ShaneDawg85]

Nobody saw that bunt from Jones coming, myself included. That was a thing of beauty.

[Goop]

Nice bunt, AJ!

[Can_of_corn]

Nice!!!

good play by Jones

[trk001]

Welp, that there was a good bunt.

[ShoelesJoe]

We needed that 3rd run. Why didn't Izzi bunt and move the runner to second. Then GB by Monty would have scored the run. Did we expect the 3 run HR from Izzi?:rolleyestf:

I was thinking the same thing. If we'd have had men on 1st and 2nd the bunt would have been on, and we'd have had a better chance of getting that 3rd run. Instead Trembley plays for the big inning and gets we wind up with bupkis.

[alaniee]

Beautiful bunt single by Jones. That's what he needs to do a little more, mix it up rather than go up hacking every time.