Jump to content

O's Sign Everth Cabrera


SticksandStones

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 424
  • Created
  • Last Reply
The O's paid Ryan Webb $1.8 m and he spent a month in the minors last season. They couldn't option Ubaldo but paid him $11.3 m only to stash him on the DL for a month and then hide him in the bullpen for another month. If Ubaldo had an option, I am near certain he would have been optioned last season since they basically did all they could to hide him anyway. They paid Francisco Peguero $600K to play exclusively in the minors before getting released. Reimold was paid $1 m last year without ever reaching Baltimore.

I think there is enough evidence to suggest that if Cabrera doesn't perform, he won't stick around long on the major league team. I think his salary (which is based partially on his past successes) will give him an inside edge at making the team out of Spring Training, but I don't think he's going to be on the team the entire year just because of his salary.

Reimold only got the portion of his salary from the Orioles until he went to Canada.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point I'm making is that it's hard to put someone in your lineup when they put up the kind of offensive numbers he does in Petco (.630 OPS). His .670 OPS outside of Petco is a lot less ugly and would get him put in the lineup more and would compliment his speed and defense a better. For what it's worth, he has a 1.045 OPS in 11 plate appearances in Camden Yards. If he gets regular at bats, I predict he'll have a .700-.730 OPS this year for the Orioles.

He's been so up-and-down, there's no telling what he might do. .700-.730 is definitely possible. So is .550-.570. Hopefully he has a good year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The O's paid Ryan Webb $1.8 m and he spent a month in the minors last season. They couldn't option Ubaldo but paid him $11.3 m only to stash him on the DL for a month and then hide him in the bullpen for another month. If Ubaldo had an option, I am near certain he would have been optioned last season since they basically did all they could to hide him anyway. They paid Francisco Peguero $600K to play exclusively in the minors before getting released. Reimold was paid $1 m last year without ever reaching Baltimore.

I think there is enough evidence to suggest that if Cabrera doesn't perform, he won't stick around long on the major league team. I think his salary (which is based partially on his past successes) will give him an inside edge at making the team out of Spring Training, but I don't think he's going to be on the team the entire year just because of his salary.

It is February 18th. You don't sign a player this late if he isn't going to make the team to start the season. Webb was pushed out for one reason because of how well Brach was pitching. The pen was healthy for the most part as well. If Cabrera stinks up the joint he will be sent down but I think it is 100% he makes the team on Opening Day.

Nobody was clamoring for this move to be made. The Orioles didn't have to do it. They aren't investing that kind of money this late just for depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is February 18th. You don't sign a player this late if he isn't going to make the team to start the season. Webb was pushed out for one reason because of how well Brach was pitching. The pen was healthy for the most part as well. If Cabrera stinks up the joint he will be sent down but I think it is 100% he makes the team on Opening Day.

Don't know but I'd say Flaherty is less likely to survive a slow start this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know but I'd say Flaherty is less likely to survive a slow start this year.

Maybe he could be traded in a package deal with a bullpen arm? To me this move came out of nowhere unless someone is nursing an injury. The salary is too much for a depth move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is February 18th. You don't sign a player this late if he isn't going to make the team to start the season. Webb was pushed out for one reason because of how well .

This rationale doesn't make much sense. Players signing this late probably have a lower probability of making the team. If you haven't signed by ST then there is a reason why.

I agree his salary makes it doubtful he is sent down unless he is terrible but the rationale that he signed this late so he will make it isn't solid.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point I'm making is that it's hard to put someone in your lineup when they put up the kind of offensive numbers he does in Petco (.630 OPS). His .670 OPS outside of Petco is a lot less ugly and would get him put in the lineup more and would compliment his speed and defense a better. For what it's worth, he has a 1.045 OPS in 11 plate appearances in Camden Yards. If he gets regular at bats, I predict he'll have a .700-.730 OPS this year for the Orioles.

If he did that, stole 30 bases and played a great second base... I'd find him plenty of playing time. Also, if he's able to see a lot of pitches, that'd be nice. We need a leadoff hitter (maybe Lough's a possible here too?). A switch-hitting second baseman who can steal bases and bat leadoff. Sounds vaguely familiar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe he could be traded in a package deal with a bullpen arm? To me this move came out of nowhere unless someone is nursing an injury. The salary is too much for a depth move.
This is my thinking as well. They have plenty of depth at 2B/UTIF and at a lot less cost. He wouldn't be signed for depth. He is a replacement at 2B or SS. Maybe they plan to send Schoop down or trade him. Or there is an injury we don't know about.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe he could be traded in a package deal with a bullpen arm? To me this move came out of nowhere unless someone is nursing an injury. The salary is too much for a depth move.

I mentioned it before, but I think it's Moreso willingness to pay on the part of the team and willingness to sign on the part of the player coming into equilibrium. I doubt Cabrera was accepting this offer in December. Maybe it's been on the table for a while, who knows? The os don't need more IF depth/pinch runner for $5 or $6m, but they decided 2.4m was a price they would be in at.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mentioned it before, but I think it's Moreso willingness to pay on the part of the team and willingness to sign on the part of the player coming into equilibrium. I doubt Cabrera was accepting this offer in December. Maybe it's been on the table for a while, who knows? The os don't need more IF depth/pinch runner for $5 or $6m, but they decided 2.4m was a price they would be in at.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They don't need it at that price either It wouldn't be a depth signing..
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • 1) I don't think it's a bad idea to consider moving on from non-productive vets like Hays and possibly Mullins as well. 2) I'm almost starting to move toward the opinion of re-signing Santander. He is likely not to require a major financial commitment (3/4 years at modest money). And I believe because most of his contributions come from counting stats (homers and RBIs) he is likely to be undervalued in this era of statcast baseball. 3) Elias has never (IMO for good reason) decided to take the approach of multiple/several first timers learning on the job at all at once. The potential for that to go sideways represents too much risk, when you are trying to win a World Series. 4) You didn't just mention moving on from Mullins and Hays. But you also mentioned Santander, O'Hearn, and Mountcastle. That is FIVE regulars and replacing them all with players who have never proven that they can hit Major League pitching. I would almost bet that there aren't 5 first timers in all of MLB who are succeeding this season on their first try. Now obviously, for Holliday next season will be his second try. And I guess 3rd for Stowers, maybe 4th depending how you look at it. And second/third for Kjerstad, Norby (I guess second). Though some of these guys stints were so short, I don't know if they could even get/make much of it some of those previous times. 5) If we make it to the postseason (which we are almost assured to do) win or lose this year in the Fall, it will be a very poor message to send to the fanbase to not spend/add in the offseason. With a payroll this low (ranked what 25th?) you should not be cutting cost and especially with a multi-billionaire owner. 6) If you don't trade any of these players this season, how do you propose that we get better/get the piece(s) that we need? 7) Even with all of these new young players and even if all of them performed right away, where is the pitching going to come from next season in order to legitimately contend (if you don't spend in the offseason)?
    • Nobody thought Toronto would not cash in on their "window". It slammed shut on them and they had a lot of young talent that regressed pretty hard. Cautionary tales are out there.
    • What an odd question. Of course it’s important. The entire baseball world will be paying attention to this series. The two best teams in all baseball, in the same division, each going for a crown at the expense of the other, and neither a big fan of the other. Wins are important regardless of the opponent, but it also goes without saying that we would rather win three out of four against the Yankees, than three out of four against the Athletics, or even other contenders like the Mariners or Guards.  
    • Yeah, too much young talent for that to happen next year, unless some major regression and injuries happen.
    • Mike Elias' job certainly entails doing due diligence on Jack Flaherty again.  
    • even if they do, so what? 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...