Jump to content

Roberts since August 19th


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

Since Brian Roberts went on that tear for about a little over a week in August and sent his supporters into the "I told you so" mode, he's hit .198/.274/.333/.607 in his last 106 PAs and basically becoming the player that I thought he truly was.

Add in his two defensively miscues last night (neither were called an error but both cost us runners that thankfully did not hurt the team) and we have to ask, should he be playing every day down the stretch?

Flaherty has received only 27 PAs over the same stretch and his hit .217/.333/.435/.768 while playing much better defense (something even most Roberts supporters would attest to).

Why not give Flaherty some starts against right-handers leaving Roberts to pinch hit in a crucial late inning situation that he's excelled at this year?

Maybe Roberts has one more tear in him, but I still think he's better served coming off the bench at this stage in his career.

Do I think Buck will do this? Nope. But I would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

You've picked the time period that best suits your argument. Eliminate August 19-20 and BRob is at .667 instead of .607, and really he has been hovering around .660-.680 all during September.

As to the defense, while I do think Flaherty is better, and Roberts did get away with two miscues last night, in general BRob has played very good defense the last 6-7 weeks. His dWAR was at -0.8 at the end of July but is at -0.1 now. UZR shows something similar, and currently has him at +2.5.

Probably the best argument for BRob is his good performance with runners in scoring position, especially getting runners in from 3B with less than two out. In key situations, he always seems to have a good at bat.

Frankly, I'd be fine with Flaherty getting some starts. But I think it's a close case, and like you, I don't really expect Buck to sit Roberts now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Brian Roberts went on that tear for about a little over a week in August and sent his supporters into the "I told you so" mode, he's hit .198/.274/.333/.607 in his last 106 PAs and basically becoming the player that I thought he truly was.

Add in his two defensively miscues last night (neither were called an error but both cost us runners that thankfully did not hurt the team) and we have to ask, should he be playing every day down the stretch?

Flaherty has received only 27 PAs over the same stretch and his hit .217/.333/.435/.768 while playing much better defense (something even most Roberts supporters would attest to).

Why not give Flaherty some starts against right-handers leaving Roberts to pinch hit in a crucial late inning situation that he's excelled at this year?

Maybe Roberts has one more tear in him, but I still think he's better served coming off the bench at this stage in his career.

Do I think Buck will do this? Nope. But I would.

I hope not. That'd be a sad way to end his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't realize he was hitting so poorly... seems to have more than his share of big moments.

Valencia starting against righites has squeezed Flaherty out of the equation... and BRob being a switch hitter make the O's less susceptable to bullpen matchups.

I cringe with every ball hit to 2B... Roberts really has a noodle arm. Flaherty should be in any game that we have a lead (small) after 7 innings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've picked the time period that best suits your argument. Eliminate August 19-20 and BRob is at .667 instead of .607, and really he has been hovering around .660-.680 all during September.

As to the defense, while I do think Flaherty is better, and Roberts did get away with two miscues last night, in general BRob has played very good defense the last 6-7 weeks. His dWAR was at -0.8 at the end of July but is at -0.1 now. UZR shows something similar, and currently has him at +2.5.

Probably the best argument for BRob is his good performance with runners in scoring position, especially getting runners in from 3B with less than two out. In key situations, he always seems to have a good at bat.

Frankly, I'd be fine with Flaherty getting some starts. But I think it's a close case, and like you, I don't really expect Buck to sit Roberts now.

I also think Roberts positions himself defensively better than Flaherty and in that way sort of compensates for his comparative lack of range. Not to mention BROBs incredible ability to get runners in from third with less than two out. I love seeing him come up in those situations. He also seems to foul off a lot of tough pitches which is something more of our hitters should be doing..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah this is an example of where I wish we had a stat for QAB. I like seeing Roberts in leverage situations because I feel he is one of the hitters most likely to have a QAB. Sometimes the numbers we have don't tell the whole story.

No one going to dispute that Roberts has hit extremely well in high leverage situations this year. The issue is whether that type of performance is sustainable/projectible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course it isn't. At the same time, it seems apparent to me that Roberts is a tougher out (not to mean that he and Flaherty won't make the same number of outs) and is tougher to pitch to. Flaherty is dangerous hitter because of his power but he has holes in his swing and seems much more succeptible to offspead stuff. The numbers might be close when it's all said and done but Roberts has better AB's at this stage. The defensive part of the equation is even tougher to compare. There's little doubt that Flaherty looks like the better player defensively but Roberts has been very steady overall.

Well, they OPS about 20 points apart this year. I'd personally give the edge to Flaherty on defense by a wide margin despite what the numbers say in a SSS. I think Flaherty actually takes close to the P/PA that Roberts does last I checked. So I think it really boils down to to discounting Flaherty's upside and whether you think Roberts can hit in the clutch better than Flaherty right now. Maybe. No doubt Roberts has done that.

Like others have said, it doesn't really matter. Roberts is going to play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's come through in the clutch, defense is bad, at-bats are usually pretty awesome to amazing. He slowed Peavy down a bit last night.

I don't think clutch hitting is repeatable. Flaherty should probably be starting but you know he won't, I mean it's basically an academic question since there's no way Roberts isn't starting unless he is hurt. Really surprised he was not replaced on defense in the 12th last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't mind seeing Roberts become our leadoff guy. With him, you're almost guaranteed to have a quality at bat and a guy who will make the pitcher work. McClouth is struggling...

.307 OBP? Middling speed? Why?

I'd actually rather lead off Chris Davis or something. Markakis isn't very inspiring either but he's got a better OBP. McLouth is probably the best leadoff option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • That is good news, as we have plenty of offensive potential to trade for pitching!
    • If that number is the barometer then the answer is yes. Absolutely yes!  If the goal is to one build a longer term multiple World Series winning team, then you don’t let elite/irreplaceable talent walk. Look around the game, nobody is really doing that anymore. At least not without retaining at least one franchise player to market/build around. If the other goal is to grow the franchise’s viability/relevance/fanbase/revenues within this market, you have to have superstar m/face of the franchise players that people want to see and corporations want to invest as dollars in.
    • Baseball America 10. Moises Chace, RHP, Orioles Chace’s stuff across the board is getting more swing-and-miss than it did a year ago. A 20-year-old righthander with High-A Abderdeen, Chace is throwing slightly harder than he did in 2023, sitting at 93-95 mph and reaching 96 mph with a riding fastball. He’s getting a high amount of whiffs both with a changeup that has good fade and separation off his fastball as well as a high-spin slider (2,700-2,900 rpm) that has sharp sweep across the zone. It’s a starter’s repertoire, though after recording a 15-to-2 strikeout-to-walk ratio in his first two starts, Chace walked six in four innings in his last outing. Control has been an issue for Chace before—he walked 53 in 68 innings last year—so while he has the stuff to start, location will be key for him to stick in that role.
    • Baseball America  4. Michael Forret, RHP, Orioles Forret was a 14th-round pick from State JC of Florida last year who signed with the Orioles for $450,000. He pitched in the low 90s, touched 94 mph and showed the strength projection in his 6-foot-3, 190-pound frame to think there could be more in the tank. The 20-year-old righthander has added a few ticks to his fastball already this year in Low-A Delmarva, sitting 93-95 mph and touching 97. His plus slider has been a major weapon in the low-to-mid 80s, giving him a sharp breaking ball that snaps off with late bite to miss bats. Overall, Forret has a 3.46 ERA with 19 strikeouts and three walks in 13 innings, making him one of the more intriguing sleeper prospects in the lower levels.
    • What's the run scored per game average in MLB now compared to this point last year?
    • I picked Adley simply because he was here first, he seems like the most realistic shot at an extension, and he’s the heart and soul of the team. Gunnar is the more elite talent, for sure, but are they going to top BWJ’s deal? Of course there is no real frame of reference for how the new ownership group will spend, but I’d be floored if they topped 11/288. Burnes has made it pretty clear that he wants to hit FA and it ultimately feels like he’ll end up back on the west coast. 
    • I don’t know how you are assessing value? Is it to express who is being paid the least for the most productivity? Is it age vs production? Is it who is the best player right now? 5 tool talent? Something else?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...