Jump to content

Steve Pearce is...


Al Pardo

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Hose him down,. This is ridiculous. And it's really a mirage. He is actually a .744 OPS player, so pay no attention to what appears to be happening on the field right now. Eventually he will turn into a pumpkin and be so bad that the runs he is creating will be subtracted. Over the past month his BA has gone down from .360 to .300 and his OBP has gone down from .424 to .318. His slugging is going up from .693 to .850. He is turning back into the all or nothing guy he really is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh man.

Where to start.

WHO CARES DUDE. Congratulations for stating the obvious that 100% of the board already knows: that Steve Pearce isn't really this good all the time. No!! REALLY??!!

Enough with this crap. The guy is hot and he's fun to watch. Let's enjoy it without sanctimoniously stating his career stats at every turn. We already know who Steve Pearce is, trust me.

Standing tall on your soapbox today, eh Dan? Wow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh man.

Where to start.

WHO CARES DUDE. Congratulations for stating the obvious that 100% of the board already knows: that Steve Pearce isn't really this good all the time. No!! REALLY??!!

Enough with this crap. The guy is hot and he's fun to watch. Let's enjoy it without sanctimoniously stating his career stats at every turn for the sake of buzz killing. Because that's all it is - buzzkill for the sake of buzzkill. We already know who Steve Pearce is, trust me.

Just practicing my Drungo impression. Excuse me. :drungo::P
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hose him down,. This is ridiculous. And it's really a mirage. He is actually a .744 OPS player, so pay no attention to what appears to be happening on the field right now. Eventually he will turn into a pumpkin and be so bad that the runs he is creating will be subtracted. Over the past month his BA has gone down from .360 to .300 and his OBP has gone down from .424 to .318. His slugging is going up from .693 to .850. He is turning back into the all or nothing guy he really is.

When a 31-year-old has provided 82% of his career value in his last 165 PAs you should definitely pencil (sorry, permanent Sharpie) him in for a regular gig on the All Star team for the next 4-5 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh man.

Where to start.

WHO CARES DUDE. Congratulations for stating the obvious that 100% of the board already knows: that Steve Pearce isn't really this good all the time. No!! REALLY??!!

Enough with this crap. The guy is hot and he's fun to watch. Let's enjoy it without sanctimoniously stating his career stats at every turn for the sake of buzz killing. Because that's all it is - buzzkill for the sake of buzzkill. We already know who Steve Pearce is, trust me.

:wedge: You do dude.................... :agree:

I get sick of the WAR this, OPS this, etc.... I look at stats too, but not every breathing moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gordo's favorite pastime is to hyperbolically exaggerate a stereotype of me hyperbolically exaggerating.
Exactly. Which is hyperbolic Drungo and which is Gordo's hyperbolic exaggeration? That's the question.

jimmy-durante.jpg

I sometimes have trouble telling the difference myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I refuse to give into cynicism. Much more unlikely things have happened then a 31 year old baseball player exploding into stardom after spending a long time as a role player. Do I expect it to happen? No. But those citing advanced metrics and totally discounting the possibility are cheating themselves of the joy of the moment and the hope for more to come. Life is hard to define and explain. Baseball is impossible to completely quantify, even for actuaries. So, I will enjoy the moment and hope for more, fWar be damned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I refuse to give into cynicism. Much more unlikely things have happened then a 31 year old baseball player exploding into stardom after spending a long time as a role player. Do I expect it to happen? No. But those citing advanced metrics and totally discounting the possibility are cheating themselves of the joy of the moment and the hope for more to come. Life is hard to define and explain. Baseball is impossible to completely quantify, even for actuaries. So, I will enjoy the moment and hope for more, fWar be damned.
To say his career numbers suggest it's unlikely, is not the same as totally discounting the possibility. At least not in English.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I refuse to give into cynicism. Much more unlikely things have happened then a 31 year old baseball player exploding into stardom after spending a long time as a role player.

Through age 30 Steve Pearce had played 290 MLB games and totaled 0.6 rWAR. There have been about 2000 non-pitchers who roughly matched that criteria (played 100+ games through age 30, rWAR < 1.0)

The best players on that list from age 31-on include Frank Baumholtz, John Vander Wal, Kaz Matsui, Buck Martinez, and Augie Ojeda.

I'm rooting for Pearce to be a productive player for a long time for the Orioles. But in some ways that would be unprecedented. Even stretching the definitions a bit you get a few guys like Lee Stevens. It's very, very rare to be unproductive in your 20s and a star in your 30s. For a position player. It's just rare for a pitcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Through age 30 Steve Pearce had played 290 MLB games and totaled 0.6 rWAR. There have been about 2000 non-pitchers who roughly matched that criteria (played 100+ games through age 30, rWAR < 1.0)

He had 847 PA in that span, a good amount of it pinch-hitting. It's come out to 212 games if you count a more regular 4 PA/G. Not that this changes your point too much.

He seems like a Luke Scott type to me. Always solid in the minors, never found a real opening in the majors. Maybe a year or two of solid hitting left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He had 847 PA in that span, a good amount of it pinch-hitting. It's come out to 212 games if you count a more regular 4 PA/G. Not that this changes your point too much.

He seems like a Luke Scott type to me. Always solid in the minors, never found a real opening in the majors. Maybe a year or two of solid hitting left.

I kind of like the Vander Wal comp. He pinch hit a lot, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Wow, that’s crazy. I didn’t see that before. The thing I hope they take from that, besides what you mentioned, is just to stop overrating college OFers, especially left handed ones. Whats odd is that they said the likes Povich a lot..which I guess tells you how much they liked Rhodes..for some reason.
    • David Hernandez’s dad would come after me because I said I thought his son was a future reliever and wouldn’t be a ML starter. He used to get into with me all the time when I would talk about that.
    • By the way, did anyone notice Povich was taken as an underslot 3rd round pick ($500k), a pick after Mason Miller ($599k) was drafted by the A's in the 2021 draft. Not to beat this dead horse, but the Orioles selected John Rhodes 21 picks before Miller and gave him overslot at $1,375,000. Sometimes you win some (Gunnar/Westburg) and sometimes you lose some in those 2nd-3rd rounds. And yes, this is where @DrungoHazewood or @Frobby tells us that most players are misses in these rounds which is 100% correct.  I'm just hoping seeing how some of these 3rd round pitchers have done well will help them select more in the higher rounds like they did in last draft. Also, I'm hoping with failures like Carter Young and Rhodes to a lesser extent, they realize guys that did not perform well in college the year before they get drafted may not have because they weren't that good. But that's a different subject than Povich so digress. I've moved Povich up to the top pitching prospect in the system but Luis DeLeon is right on his heels.  
    • She actually contacted me and told me someone else had been using her account. Generally, I feel like there's been a recent uptick in people getting personal with other posters and being unnecessarily snarky about others' opinions.   I'm glad you drew a line here.   He obviously watched Povich's games closely (according to his posts, he's not related but is kind of a Nebraska Cornhusker insider who follows their prospects very closely and has sources in the program).   Occasionally he'd post some useful details about why the box score didn't fully reflect Povich's outing.   But the "Billy Boxscore" stuff was irritating, and he should have stopped when you told him to.   Instead he just doubled down on being a jerk.   
    • I agree, way too much dirt thrown on the Hays grave lately.  Less (not zero, to be clear) exposure to lefties for Cowser would be a good thing, and Hays is more likely to provide the offsetting RH bat needed than McKenna is, with at least equal and probably better defense.  I know Kjerstad isn't getting many at bats, but McKenna needs to be the one to go in spite of that.
    • I'm assuming you're saying that you want the talking about the streak to end, not the streak itself. Your actual wording was ambiguous enough to be taken either way, hence my teasing. However, have it your way. Please add to whatever it is you're counting.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...