Jump to content

Terrin Vavra Bandwagon


Filmstudy

Recommended Posts

He gets on base.  Nothing about his approach or his minor league resume suggests that he is a fluke.  He needs to be hitting at the top of the order--if there are concerns about his defense, make him the regular DH when Adley is catching, and give him chances at 2B or LF when Adley is the DH.   He can be our answer to Stephen Kwan.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, RZNJ said:

He’s not replacing Santander’s bat. He’s replacing Mancini’s.   Replacing Odor is tricky.  Can Vavra make those throws from shallow RF? I think Vavra is more likely to replace Hays or Mullins eventually.   Urías is probably going to replace Odor and Henderson will take over 3B.

How can he play CF if his arm can’t make second base throws? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

He gets on base.  Nothing about his approach or his minor league resume suggests that he is a fluke.  He needs to be hitting at the top of the order--if there are concerns about his defense, make him the regular DH when Adley is catching, and give him chances at 2B or LF when Adley is the DH.   He can be our answer to Stephen Kwan.  

This.

Mullins has been a good RISP guy.  Maybe Cedric moves to the middle of the lineup.  Need Vavra leading off a bunch of innings.

As far as 2B goes, Vavra would have to play very poorly to limbo under the Odor standard.  Odor has cost the Orioles 10 runs relative to average on offense, 5 on defense, and 1 due to his higher than average DP rate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tntoriole said:

How can he play CF if his arm can’t make second base throws? 

I didn't say he couldn't make the traditional 2B throws.  The ones from short RF require a very strong arm.  We've had Mullins out there before he improved his throwing.  I bet Vavra throws as well as the new and improved Cedric.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of the questions and speculation is probably answered by the player description in MLB orioles prospects.   The key characteristic of Vavra is that  he is had a very very good eye for pitching and knowledge of how to work for a superior OBP.  He also has good speed and I look at him as a future lead off batter.    He has good speed, + but not as fast as the standard ++ Orioles outfielder or the Mullens/Mateio +++.  Enough speed to have some consideration as a CF OF, but that isn't going to happen here where there is a different standard!.   Read the rest of the player description to appreciate what they say about his upbringing and development.  He looks like just the guy to start wearing down an opposing pitcher and having a high OPB to get things rolling in the first inning. 

Quote

On the field, Vavra’s natural feel to hit stands out more than anything else. He works counts and knows the strike zone extremely well, walking nearly as much as he's struck out in his Minor League career. He’s known as a gamer who manipulates the bat head well and rarely gets fooled, consistently squaring up the baseball from both sides of the plate. The power is only fringe to average, though he’s shown more from the left side of the plate thus far. Defensively, Vavra profiles best at second but also showed well in center field in a small sample last summer.

https://www.mlb.com/prospects/orioles/terrin-vavra-679631

 

  •  
  • Follow topic
  •  

Ezoicreport this ad
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Filmstudy said:

As far as 2B goes, Vavra would have to play very poorly to limbo under the Odor standard.  Odor has cost the Orioles 10 runs relative to average on offense, 5 on defense, and 1 due to his higher than average DP rate.

That's a game and a half... which would put us in a tie by now for the Wild Card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Gunnar’s fWAR is 4.7. It was 4.7 for all of 2023. Hes a top 3 player in the game right now.
    • Irvin, Kremer, and maybe Povich are all capable of Game 3. You’re overstating what is necessary for postseason success. It doesn’t have to be a fool proof team. This offense is capable of carrying a league average #3 SP. 
    • Here are some June numbers as of the day off: Hays 1.227 OPS Santander 1.074, 12 R, 8 HR 14 RBI Henderson 1.021, 14 R O’Hearn .906 Urias .837 Rutschman .809, 4 HR 16 RBI Westburg.765 Mountcastle .743, 10 R, 5 HR, 12 RBI Cowser .697 Stowers .588 Mullins .587 Mateo .520 Overall, the team has an .832 OPS in June and is averaging 5.56 runs per game, while allowing 2.88 runs per game.   That’ll work.
    • His sprint speed is in the 88th percentile.
    • Was he favoring his right elbow, as well?
    • I can't say what Elias will do. Because I have no way of knowing that. I have no inside knowledge. I'm just a fan like everybody else. What I can and will say is that he should be exploring every way to meaningful upgrade the roster where it is weakest, which is the pitching staff. I understand not wanting to trade Holliday (and he should not IMO). Holliday's value, while still very high, is probably not as high it was before the season started. But as far as the other two are concerned. An argument can be made that they are redundant pieces. One of them can be made expendable through a Santander (very affordable) extension.  Now, what I will say, is that I don't think that it is the best strategy long term to hoard position player prospects (especially those who are redundant no matter how talented) at the sake of not having comparable talent on the pitching side. That has us with a prime aged Kjerstad wasting a season at AAA (while destroying the baseball) because there is literally no place to play him. I see it as taking on unnecessary risks to replace Santander and/or O'Hearn/Mountcastle when they are affordable and productive Major League players. Yes it is possible all of our prospects out hit/out produce them. But it is also possible that all do not. Replacing them all may lead to an unforced error in betting on the future. IMO it doesn't have to be a binary choice of either/or with productive vets vs uber talented young prospects. We can have our cake and eat it to by taking a both/and approach. We will still have TWO uber talented prospects next year in Holliday and one of Mayo/Basallo while having Santander (extended) AND O'Hearn (on a team option at a very affordable contract) AND a difference making pitcher (to help soften the blow/loss of Bradish). Yes this requires a little spending (which I acknowledge some posters hate the idea of that). But again it comes down to expectations and the bar that the org sets. If we want to be the next Astros (multi-World Series winners) it's not going to solely be about our front office and scouting talent, and trying to always be the smartest guys in the room. Sometimes the ownership has to do their part and invest in the known quotient/reliable talent that can keep your odds as high as possible because you can go toe-to-toe/bullet-for-bullet with anyone. 
    • Do players really have that much control of direction? I definitely think there's a major variance factor in that. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...