Jump to content

Why can't we pitch?


calmunderfire

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Tillman, Chen, Gonzalez and Norris all belong in a major league rotation. The problem is, collectively, with a normal number 5 they are not the rotation of a playoff team. Even with an awesome offensive and defensive team (which we will probably have), we are not getting to the playoffs without a solid fifth guy to go with them. Not necessarily an ace, but probably like a 3 WAR guy (which still may be the best of all five).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tillman, Chen, Gonzalez and Norris all belong in a major league rotation. The problem is, collectively, with a normal number 5 they are not the rotation of a playoff team. Even with an awesome offensive and defensive team (which we will probably have), we are not getting to the playoffs without a solid fifth guy to go with them. Not necessarily an ace, but probably like a 3 WAR guy (which still may be the best of all five).

I don't agree with this. I think it's more an instance of too little, too late. If we'd started the season with Tillman, Chen, Gonzalez, Norris and Feldman as our rotation, I bet we'd be neck and neck with Boston, or damn close to it. The problems are 1) we blew a ton of games early on with Hammel, Britton, Arrieta, Gausman and Garcia and 2) Jim Johnson.

Considering our offense and defense, a rotation of Tillman, Chen, Gonzalez, Norris and Feldman would have been good enough to get the job done. The performance gap between Norris and Feldman and what our other 4/5 starters have done is enormous.

I'm not necessarily critiquing DD for failing to acquire another starter last offseason, because it made sense to see if Arrieta and Britton would stick and, of course, Hammel was lights out much of last year. It was a reasonable gamble to take, but pretty much no one panned out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't agree with this. I think it's more an instance of too little, too late. If we'd started the season with Tillman, Chen, Gonzalez, Norris and Feldman as our rotation, I bet we'd be neck and neck with Boston, or damn close to it. The problems are 1) we blew a ton of games early on with Hammel, Britton, Arrieta, Gausman and Garcia and 2) Jim Johnson.

Considering our offense and defense, a rotation of Tillman, Chen, Gonzalez, Norris and Feldman would have been good enough to get the job done. The performance gap between Norris and Feldman and what our other 4/5 starters have done is enormous.

I'm not necessarily critiquing DD for failing to acquire another starter last offseason, because it made sense to see if Arrieta and Britton would stick and, of course, Hammel was lights out much of last year. It was a reasonable gamble to take, but pretty much no one panned out.

No. If JJ would not have blew all those damn saves we'd be neck and neck with Boston.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't agree with this. I think it's more an instance of too little, too late. If we'd started the season with Tillman, Chen, Gonzalez, Norris and Feldman as our rotation, I bet we'd be neck and neck with Boston, or damn close to it. The problems are 1) we blew a ton of games early on with Hammel, Britton, Arrieta, Gausman and Garcia and 2) Jim Johnson.

Considering our offense and defense, a rotation of Tillman, Chen, Gonzalez, Norris and Feldman would have been good enough to get the job done. The performance gap between Norris and Feldman and what our other 4/5 starters have done is enormous.

I'm not necessarily critiquing DD for failing to acquire another starter last offseason, because it made sense to see if Arrieta and Britton would stick and, of course, Hammel was lights out much of last year. It was a reasonable gamble to take, but pretty much no one panned out.

No. If JJ would not have blew all those damn saves we'd be neck and neck with Boston.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't agree with this. I think it's more an instance of too little, too late. If we'd started the season with Tillman, Chen, Gonzalez, Norris and Feldman as our rotation, I bet we'd be neck and neck with Boston, or damn close to it. The problems are 1) we blew a ton of games early on with Hammel, Britton, Arrieta, Gausman and Garcia and 2) Jim Johnson.

Considering our offense and defense, a rotation of Tillman, Chen, Gonzalez, Norris and Feldman would have been good enough to get the job done. The performance gap between Norris and Feldman and what our other 4/5 starters have done is enormous.

I'm not necessarily critiquing DD for failing to acquire another starter last offseason, because it made sense to see if Arrieta and Britton would stick and, of course, Hammel was lights out much of last year. It was a reasonable gamble to take, but pretty much no one panned out.

Oh yeah, I agree. Sorry I wasn't clear, I was really talking about next season. I think DD did all he reasonable could have and should have on the starting pitching front in the offseason and the trade deadline. I don't think a Tillman/Chen/Gonzo/Norris/Feldman rotation all year would have gotten us into guaranteed playoff position, but would have gotten us close.

I liked the Feldman and Norris deals. We were really hurt badly by Hammel's awful season/injury, Bundy's injury, and the inability for Arrieta/Britton/Gausman to fill the 5th spot in the rotation. We had plenty of starting candidates at the start of the season and really burned through them.

Next year, I think we do need to step up and get a solid SP to go with Tillman/Chen/Gonzo/Norris. Gausman should have to force his way on the team and can be that crucial 6th starter depth, and he's the best of our in-house options. If we go into 2014 without a SP acquisition, it's going to be a tough road to the playoffs. Basically, we need to get somebody who is a clear upgrade over what Feldman is now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Next year, I think we do need to step up and get a solid SP to go with Tillman/Chen/Gonzo/Norris. Gausman should have to force his way on the team and can be that crucial 6th starter depth, and he's the best of our in-house options. If we go into 2014 without a SP acquisition, it's going to be a tough road to the playoffs. Basically, we need to get somebody who is a clear upgrade over what Feldman is now.

I agree with all of this, though I'd be pretty happy if they brought Feldman or an equivalent pitcher back for the fifth spot. Fortunately there are a lot of good 3/4 guys available this offseason and I think DD won't have much trouble finding a solid guy for a one or two year deal. I'm mostly worried about whether or not the money will be there. Even with Roberts' money coming off the books, pretty much all of it is going to get chewed up in arbitration raises.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...