Jump to content

TT: Scott used increased spin rate to dominate last year


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I think of Scott as a core player of the rebuild.  He will be arbitration eligible after the 2021 season.  He will not be a FA until after the 2024 season.     I don't see the O's trading him until 2023 unless someone blows them away with an offer.

Scott is one of the reasons the O's may turn things around in the year or two.

I don’t disagree with that, but it depends on the timing, where Mike thinks we are now, and whether Scott will be more valuable to us as a player or as a chip. If Mike keeps him(Assuming he continues to improve) It will indicate he thinks we’re closer to contention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/28/2021 at 11:43 AM, scOtt said:

IIRC, spin rates were one of the main things Matt Harvey and the Jersey sports performance place was focusing on too.

 

 

 

 

Just like pool (billiards) it's all about the spin. ;)

It's a good thing because he's lost significant spin rate on his fastball (about 200 RPM) off his fastball from his pre surgery hey days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/28/2021 at 11:31 AM, wildcard said:

I think of Scott as a core player of the rebuild.  He will be arbitration eligible after the 2021 season.  He will not be a FA until after the 2024 season.     I don't see the O's trading him until 2023 unless someone blows them away with an offer.

Scott is one of the reasons the O's may turn things around in the year or two.

I understand this completely, but I see him as a trade piece ultimately. In fact I would try to sling him ASAP if he continues to pitch well. I think at most we have a setup guy who at any moment could lose command and have a bad year. He had a great 20 innings and I'm happy about his increased spin, but I don't really buy that's he more valuable to the O's as a setup guy or even closer than whatever ML-ready piece(s) he could bring back in a trade.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, interloper said:

I understand this completely, but I see him as a trade piece ultimately. In fact I would try to sling him ASAP if he continues to pitch well. I think at most we have a setup guy who at any moment could lose command and have a bad year. He had a great 20 innings and I'm happy about his increased spin, but I don't really buy that's he more valuable to the O's as a setup guy or even closer than whatever ML-ready piece(s) he could bring back in a trade.  

Also, relievers are extremely volatile. If he becomes a bonafide stud this year (doubtful) his value to other teams is substantially higher than it is to the O's. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, interloper said:

I understand this completely, but I see him as a trade piece ultimately. In fact I would try to sling him ASAP if he continues to pitch well. I think at most we have a setup guy who at any moment could lose command and have a bad year. He had a great 20 innings and I'm happy about his increased spin, but I don't really buy that's he more valuable to the O's as a setup guy or even closer than whatever ML-ready piece(s) he could bring back in a trade.  

Anyone on this 26-man roster should be tradable for the right package, including Scott. I'm not in a hurry to move him, but if the trading deadline comes up and he's pitching lights out, if I'm the Orioles I'm moving him for the right package of nearly ready prospects of need.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...